顾及多分析尺度的地形部位面向对象分类方法

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170350

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 281-290.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170350

• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 下一篇

顾及多分析尺度的地形部位面向对象分类方法

江岭^1,²(), 凌德泉³, 赵明伟^1,², 王春^1,², 曾微波^1,²

1. 滁州学院安徽地理信息集成应用协同创新中心,滁州 239000
2. 安徽省地理信息智能感知与服务工程实验室,滁州 239000
3. 南京信息工程大学地理与遥感学院,南京 210044

收稿日期:2017-07-28 修回日期:2017-10-30 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-03-20
作者简介:
作者简介：江岭(1987-),男,安徽人,博士,副教授,研究方向为数字地形建模及高性能地学计算。E-mail: jiangling_xs@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41501445、41571398）;安徽省自然科学基金项目（1608085QD77）;安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目（KJ2015A171）

Object-oriented Terrain Position Classification Based on Multi-scale Geomorphons

JIANG Ling^1,^2,^*(), LING Dequan³, ZHAO Mingwei^1,², WANG Chun^1,², ZENG Weibo^1,²

1. Anhui Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Integration and Application, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China
2. Anhui Engineering Laboratory of Geo-information Smart Sensing and Services, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China
3. School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

Received:2017-07-28 Revised:2017-10-30 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-03-20
Contact: JIANG Ling E-mail:jiangling_xs@163.com
Supported by:
Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41501445, 41571398;Program of Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Anhui, No.1608085QD77;Key Project of Natural Science Research of Anhui Provincial Department of Education, No.KJ2015A171.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

地形部位是地表形态的基本单元,其分类和提取在地貌发育、数字土壤制图、景观生态制图等领域有着重要的应用。康鑫等提出的多尺度Geomorphons地形部位分类法（简称多尺度Geomorphons法）利用高程相对差异信息和地形部位多尺度特征,可避免受地形属性计算及单一分析尺度约束而误分类,然而其存在分类破碎及分析尺度域难以确定的问题。基于此,本文以多尺度Geomorphons法为基础,提出了其适宜分析尺度域确定方法,建立了以初始地形部位数据层组合的对象多尺度分割和分类方法,进而构建了顾及多分析尺度的地形部位面向对象分类方法。以陕北黄土高原区域5 m分辨率DEM为实验数据,对面向对象分类方法进行了验证与评价。实验结果表明：①均值变点法可有效解决分析尺度域难以确定的问题,实验样区适宜分析尺度域为[5×5, 33×33]栅格单元;②以0,255为二值化的地形部位数据层组合适用于多尺度分割,尺度、形状及紧致度参数组合影响分割结果,且对于实验样区存在最优分割参数;③与多尺度Geomorphons法相比,本文方法得到的地形部位分类结果完整性较好,在地表形态对应和地理认知等方面更具合理性。

关键词: 地形部位, DEM, 面向对象, 多尺度分析, 数字地形分析

Abstract:

Terrain position is the basic morphologic feature on the surface of the Earth. The classification and extraction of terrain position have been widely applied in many research fields such as landform evolution, digital soil mapping and landscape ecological mapping. Proposed by Kang X et al. (2016), the multi-scale Geomorphons method maps terrain position by recognizing the morphology of each interest cell in a DEM according to its relative altitudes within the neighboring window. Multi-scale Geomorphons method can avoid the shortnesses of other classificaton methods, which are caused by different terrain attributes and a single analysis scale. However, there are still some drawbacks in the multi-scale Geomorphons method. For example, the classification results are fragmented and the domain of the analysis scale is difficult to determine. To solve the above problems, this paper presents a new method to classify terrain position, which is based on object-oriented segmentation and multi-scale Geomorphons. First of all, we propose an approach of determining the domain of optimal analysis scale of the multi-scale Geomorphons method. Then, the multi-scale segmentation and classification methods are constructed according to the initial terrain position data via the multi-scale Geomorphons method. At last, the presented method is evaluated by the experimental data of the DEM with 5 m resolution in the loess plateau region of northern Shaanxi. The experimental results show that: (1) the method of mean change-point analysis can effectively solve the problem which is difficult to determine the domain of the analysis scale of the multi-scale Geomorphons method. The domain of optimal analysis scale of the sample area is 5×5 to 33×33 cells. (2) The layer of each terrain position type with the value 0 for non-type cells and 255 for type cells is suitable for multi-scale segmentation. The parameters (i.e. scale, weight of shape and weight of compactness) for multi-scale segmentation have deep influence on segmentation results. There is optimal segmentation parameters for a experimental region. There is optimal segmentation parameter for an experimental region. (3) Comparing with the multi-scale Geomorphons method, the classification results of the present approach are more integrity and reasonable in the aspects of morphology correspondence and geological interpretation.

Key words: terrain position, DEM, object-oriented, multi-scale analysis, DTA

江岭, 凌德泉, 赵明伟, 王春, 曾微波. 顾及多分析尺度的地形部位面向对象分类方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(3): 281-290.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170350

JIANG Ling,LING Dequan,ZHAO Mingwei,WANG Chun,ZENG Weibo. Object-oriented Terrain Position Classification Based on Multi-scale Geomorphons[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018, 20(3): 281-290.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170350

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

表2

图7

图8

图9

表3

图10

参考文献 23

[1]	Hengl T, Reuter H I.Geomorphometry: Concepts, software, applications[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2008:228-233.
[2]	康鑫,王彦文,秦承志,等.多分析尺度下综合判别的地形元素分类方法[J].地理研究,2016,35(9):1637-1646. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201609004
	[ Kang X, Wang Y W, Qin C Z, et al.A new method of landform element classification based on multi-scale morphology[J]. Geographical Research, 2016,35(9):1637-1646. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201609004
[3]	Mcdonald R C, Isbell R F, Speight J G, et al.Australian soil and land survey: Field handbook[M]. Melbourne:Inkata Press,1990:17-31.
[4]	江岭,汤国安,赵明伟,等.顾及地貌结构特征的黄土沟头提取及分析[J].地理研究,2013,32(11):2153-2162. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201311016
	[ Jiang L, Tang G A, Zhao M W, et al.Extraction and analysis of loess gully heads considering geomorphological structures[J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(11):2153-2162. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201311016
[5]	秦承志,卢岩君,邱维理,等.模糊坡位信息在精细土壤属性空间推测中的应用[J].地理研究,2010,29(9):1706-1714.
	[ Qin C Z, Lu Y J, Qiu W L, et al.Application of fuzzy slope positions in predicting spatial distribution of soil property at finer scale[J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(9):1706-1714. ]
[6]	MacMillan R A, Moon D E, Coupé R A. Automated predictive ecological mapping in a forest region of B C, Canada, 2001-2005[J]. Geoderma, 2007,140(4):353-373. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.027
[7]	李文杰,王兴奎,李丹勋,等.基于物理过程的分布式流域水沙预报模型[J].水利学报,2012,43(3):264-274.
	[ Li W J, Wang X K, Li D X, et al.A physically-based distributed model for the prediction of watershed water erosion[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2012,43(3):264-274. ]
[8]	王彦文,秦承志.地貌形态类型的自动分类方法综述[J].地理与地理信息科学,2017,33(4):16-21.
	[ Wang Y W, Qin C Z.A review on methods for landform automatic classification[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2017,33(4):16-21. ]
[9]	Wieczorek M, Migoń P.Automatic relief classification versus expert and field based landform classification for the medium-altitude mountain range, the sudetes, S W Poland[J]. Geomorphology, 2014,206:133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.005
[10]	Toshiya M, Masamu A. Automated segmentation of hillslope profiles across ridges and valleys using a digital elevation model[J]. Geomorphology, 2012,177-178:167-177. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.07.024
[11]	Drăguţ L, Minar J. Land-surface segmentation to delineate elementary forms from digital elevation model[R]. In: The Proceedings of Geomorphometry 2013, Nanjing, 2013:61-64.
[12]	Minár J, Evans I S.Elementary forms for land surface segmentation: The theoretical basis of terrain analysis and geomorphological mapping[J]. Geomorphology, 2008,95(3):236-259. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.003
[13]	秦承志,朱阿兴,施迅,等.坡位渐变信息的模糊推理[J].地理研究,2007,26(6):1165-1175.
	[ Qin C Z, Zhu A X, Shi X, et al.Fuzzy inference of spatial gradation of slope position[J]. Geographical Research, 2007,26(6):1165-1175. ]
[14]	秦承志,朱阿兴,李宝林,等.坡位的分类及其空间分布信息的定量化[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版,2009,34(3):374-377.
	[ Qin C Z, Zhu A X, Li B L, et al.Taxonomy of slope positions and quantification of their spatial distribution information[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009,34(3):374-377. ]
[15]	Qin C Z, Zhu A X, Shi X, et al.Quantification of spatial gradation of slope positions[J]. Geomorphology, 2009,110(3):152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.04.003
[16]	Pennock D J, Zebarth B J, De Jong E.Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Geoderma, 1987,40(3):297-315. doi: 10.1016/0016-7061(87)90040-1
[17]	Jasiewicz J, Stepinski T F.Geomorphons: A pattern recognition approach to classification and mapping of landforms[J]. Geomor Phology, 2013,182:147-156. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.11.005
[18]	Andrew D. topographic position and landforms analysis, the nature conservancy[OL]. , 2001.
[19]	马振华,李小苗, 本泓,等.青藏高原东北缘马衔山夷平面特征指数的提取与分析[J].地理学报,2016,71(3):400-411.
	[ Ma Z H, Li X M, Guo B H, et al.Extraction and analysis of Maxianshan planation surfaces in northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(3):400-411. ]
[20]	范建容,张子瑜,李立华.四川省山地类型界定与山区类型划分[J].地理研究,2015,34(1):65-73. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501006
	[ Fan J R, Zhang Z Y, Li L H.Mountain demarcation and mountainous area divisions of Sichuan Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(1):65-73. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201501006
[21]	周启鸣,刘学军,数字地形分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2006:45.
	[ Zhou Q M, Liu X J.Digital terrain analysis[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006:45. ]
[22]	常直杨,孙伟红,王建,等.青藏高原及其邻近地区地貌类型划分[J].山地学报,2017,35(1):1-8. doi: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000189
	[ Chang Z Y, Sun W H, Wang J, et al.Object-oriented method based on classification of geomorphic type in the Tibet Plateau and adjacent regions[J]. Mountain Research, 2017,35(1):1-8. ] doi: 10.16089/j.cnki.1008-2786.000189
[23]	Lucian D, Dirk T, Shaun R L.ESP: A tool to estimate scale parameter for multiresolution image segmentation of remotely sensed data[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010,24(6):859-871. doi: 10.1080/13658810903174803

光谱占比	形状占比	平滑度占比	紧致度占比	最优分割尺度
0.8	0.2	0.5	0.5	11
0.6	0.4	0.5	0.5	10
0.4	0.6	0.5	0.5	11
0.2	0.8	0.5	0.5	17

	独立栅格单元对象占比/%	含多个初始地形部位对象占比/%
形状权重0.2	22.46	64.53
形状权重0.4	17.82	81.65
形状权重0.6	0.00	96.90
形状权重0.8	0.00	98.68

	地形部位斑块数/个	平均地形部位斑块面积/m²	含岛地形部位斑块数/个
	地形部位斑块数/个	平均地形部位斑块面积/m²	≥ 1	≥2	≥3	≥4	≥5
多尺度Geomorphons法	124 677	779.22	9094	5159	3567	2700	2130
本文方法	25 266	3845.10	1271	561	376	282	225

顾及多分析尺度的地形部位面向对象分类方法

Object-oriented Terrain Position Classification Based on Multi-scale Geomorphons

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	何永红, 靳鹏伟, 舒敏. 基于多尺度相关性分析的InSAR对流层延迟误差改正算法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1878-1886.
[2]	陈昂, 杨秀春, 徐斌, 金云翔, 张文博, 郭剑, 邢晓语, 杨东. 基于面向对象与深度学习的榆树疏林识别方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1897-1909.
[3]	陶宇, 王春, 徐燕, 张光祖, 宋素素, 杨维. DEM建模视角下的城市道路分类与表达[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1589-1596.
[4]	罗竹, 刘凯, 张春亢, 邓心远, 马荣华, 宋春桥. DEM在湖泊水文变化研究中的应用进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(7): 1510-1521.
[5]	秦承志. 数字地形分析方法研究的维度——精准、高效、易用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 720-730.
[6]	熊礼阳, 汤国安. 黄土高原沟谷地貌发育演化研究进展与展望[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 816-826.
[7]	杜培军, 王欣, 蒙亚平, 林聪, 张鹏, 卢刚. 面向地理国情监测的变化检测与地表覆盖信息更新方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 857-866.
[8]	李思进, 代文, 熊礼阳, 汤国安. DEM分辨率对黄土侵蚀沟形态特征表达的不确定性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 338-350.
[9]	王春, 徐燕, 江岭, 赵明伟. 规则格网DEM局地坡面凸凹性精度分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 361-369.
[10]	赵尚民, 程维明, 蒋经天, 沙文娟. 资源三号卫星DEM数据与全球开放DEM数据的误差对比[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 370-378.
[11]	张鑫港, 闫浩文, 张黎明. 一种用于DEM数据认证与篡改定位的感知哈希算法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 379-388.
[12]	赵明伟, 金永林, 江岭, 王春, 杨灿灿, 徐燕. 多模型协同下的城郊地区DEM构建方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 389-398.
[13]	蔡顺, 耿豪鹏, 郑炜珊, 潘保田. 基于傅里叶变换的谷间距特征信息提取及其影响因素研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 399-409.
[14]	黄楠, 杨昕, 刘海龙. 基于等高线空间关系的鞍部点提取方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 410-421.
[15]	胡金龙, 唐梦鸽, 罗明良, 魏兰, 晏自红, 秦子晗. 基于DEM的一体化山地特征要素提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 422-430.