珠江三角洲传统村落生态侵蚀时空演变特征

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170436

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 340-350.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170436

• 地理空间分析综合应用 • 上一篇下一篇

珠江三角洲传统村落生态侵蚀时空演变特征

黄铎^1,²(), 孙莹³, 张世君², 魏成^1,^2,^*()

1. 亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室,广州 510640
2. 华南理工大学建筑学院,广州 510640
3. 广东财经大学,广州 510320

收稿日期:2017-09-20 修回日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2018-03-20 发布日期:2018-03-20
通讯作者: 魏成 E-mail:huang-duo@qq.com;weicheng@scut.edu.cn
作者简介:
作者简介：黄铎（1973-）,男,湖北荆州人,博士,讲师,研究方向为城市规划中数字技术及应用。E-mail: huang-duo@qq.com
基金资助:
资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室开放课题;亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室自主课题（2016KD21）

Spatio-temporal Evolution and Model of Ecological Erosion in Traditional Villages in the Pearl River Delta

HUANG Duo^1,²(), SUN Ying³, ZHANG Shijun², WEI Cheng^1,^2,^*()

1. State Key laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Guangzhou 510640, China
2. Architecture School, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
3. Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China;

Received:2017-09-20 Revised:2017-12-27 Online:2018-03-20 Published:2018-03-20
Contact: WEI Cheng E-mail:huang-duo@qq.com;weicheng@scut.edu.cn
Supported by:
Open Subject of State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System;Independent Subject of State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, No.2016KD21.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

传统村落的保护随着中国第四批保护名录的公布逐渐成为全社会的共识。传统村落是人类与自然环境长期相互作用与有机融合的产物,其周边农田、山林、水塘等自然生态环境使着传统村落生产及生活活动得以延续。1978年改革开放后,快速城市化的背景下,不同背景下的城乡建设使得传统村落周边生态自然环境不断遭受到侵蚀威胁,为其整体保护带来极大的挑战。为开展快速城市化背景下传统村落生态环境的影响研究,本文首先界定了传统村落生态侵蚀的概念,应用侵蚀动力学理论对自我生态侵蚀、外来生态侵蚀、突发性生态侵蚀与生态侵蚀修复4种生态侵蚀方式提出生态侵蚀演变的4种模型,同时以珠江三角洲中国传统村落为研究案例,从时间和空间上对珠江三角洲地区传统村落生态侵蚀情况进行分析,探讨其生态侵蚀演变规律,揭示快速城市化背景下传统村落生态侵蚀的时空演变特征,总结了“城镇建设外侵模式、村落建设扩张模式、道路交通占领模式、综合发展模式”4种传统村落生态侵蚀的用地演化模式,丰富和深化传统村落生态视角的研究,为传统村落的保护和相关规划提供了重要参考。

关键词: 传统村落, 生态侵蚀, 侵蚀模型, 时空演变, 珠江三角洲

Abstract:

Protecting traditional villages has gradually become the consensus of the whole society due to the announcement of the fourth batch of protection lists in China. Traditional villages are the product of the long-term interaction and organic fusion between human and natural environment. Such natural and ecological environments as the surrounding farmlands, mountains, forests and ponds maintain the production and living activities of traditional villages. However, against the backdrop of rapid urbanization after reform and opening up, the ecological environment around the villages is being threatened by increasingly serious erosion because of continuous urban and rural constructions. Urban and rural constructions also bring great challenges to the protection of traditional villages. We first define the concept of ecological erosion in traditional villages. After applying the theory of erosion dynamics, we analyze four ecological erosion ways, including self-ecological erosion, external ecological erosion, sudden ecological erosion and ecological erosion restoration. We also put forward four theoretical models of ecological erosion evolution. At the same time, according to analysis of the satellite images of ecological patches in different years, we take the traditional villages in the Pearl River Delta as the research case, analyze the ecological erosion based on various times and areas, discuss the evolvement law of ecological erosion and its temporal and spatial evolution characteristics in traditional villages under rapid urbanization. We summarize four models of ecological erosion in traditional villages, including "urban construction exterior invasion mode", "village construction expansion model", "road traffic occupation mode" and" comprehensive development model". As an effort to enrich and deepen the researches on traditional villages from ecological perspective, we provide an important reference for the protection and planning of traditional villages.

Key words: traditional villages, ecological erosion, erosion models, spatial-temporal evolution, the Pearl River Delta

黄铎, 孙莹, 张世君, 魏成. 珠江三角洲传统村落生态侵蚀时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(3): 340-350.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170436

HUANG Duo,SUN Ying,ZHANG Shijun,WEI Cheng. Spatio-temporal Evolution and Model of Ecological Erosion in Traditional Villages in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018, 20(3): 340-350.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170436

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

图3

图4

表4

参考文献 34

[1]	滕明君,周志翔,王鹏程,等.快速城市化生态基础设施结构特征与调控机制[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(s2):105-110.
	[Teng M J, Zhou Z X, Wang P C, et al.Landscape structure features of urban ecological infrastructure under rapid urbanization and adjusting mechanism[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2006,28(s2):105-110.]
[2]	张帆,郝培尧,梁伊任.生态基础设施概念、理论与方法[J].贵州社会科学,2007(9):105-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6924.2007.09.023
	[Zhang F, Hao P R, Liang Y R.Ecological infrastructure concepts, theories and methods[J].Social Sciences in Guizhou,2007(9):105-109.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6924.2007.09.023
[3]	Daily G.Nature's Services: Society Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
[4]	Benedict M, McMahon E. Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st century[J]. Renewable Resources Journal, 2002,20(3):12-17.
[5]	宁暕,朱霞.“生态恢复”理论视角下的传统村落复兴研究.2014年中国城市规划年会论文集[C].中国城市规划学会,2014,1-13.
	[Ning J, Zhu X.Research on traditional villages renovation from the perspective of ecological restoration theory[C]. Annual National Planning Conference, 2014,1-13.]
[6]	马航. 中国传统村落的延续与演变——传统聚落规划的再思考[J].城市规划学刊,2006(1):102-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2006.01.019
	[Ma H.Persistence and transformation of Chinese traditional villages - rethinking the planning of traditional settlements[J].Urban Planning Forum,2006(1):102-107.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2006.01.019
[7]	刘魁立. 文化生态保护区问题刍议[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,32(3):9-12.
	[Liu K L.On issues concerning culturally ecological reserves[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences), 2007,32(3):9-12.]
[8]	张松. 文化生态的区域性保护策略探讨——以徽州文化生态保护实验区为例[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2009,20(3):27-35,48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3060.2009.03.004
	[Zhang S.Research on the regional integrated conservation strategy for cultural ecology: A case study of Huizhou Cultural Ecology Zone[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Social Science Section), 2009,20(3):27-35,48.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3060.2009.03.004
[9]	卞利. 文化生态保护区建设中存在的问题及其解决对策——以徽州文化生态保护实验区为例[J].文化遗产,2010(4):24-30,66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0890.2010.04.004
	[Bian L.The problems of eco-cultural conservation area and their solutions: A case study on Huizhou experimental eco-cultural conservation area[J].Cultural Heritage,2010(4):24-30,66.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0890.2010.04.004
[10]	宋俊华. 关于国家文化生态保护区建设的几点思考[J].文化遗产,2011(3):1-7.
	[Song J H.Some reflections on national cultural ecology reserve construction[J].Cultural Heritage,2011(3):1-7.]
[11]	周建明,所萌,岳凤珍.文化生态保护区的理论基础与规划特征[J].城市规划,2014,38(s2):49-54. doi: 10.11819/cpr20141409a
	[Zhou J M, Suo M, Yue F Z.The theoretical basis and planning characteristics of cultural ecological conservation area[J]. City Planning Review, 2014,38(s2):49-54.] doi: 10.11819/cpr20141409a
[12]	吕勤智,丁于容.论传统村落景观形态整体性保护与发展的作用与意义[J].浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2017,16(1):17-21.
	[Lv Q Z, Ding Y R.A discourse on the effect and significance of integrated preservation of traditional village landscape[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology(Social Science), 2017,16(1):17-21.]
[13]	黄焱,孙以栋.乡村聚落的生态审美诠释——以浙江传统村落为例[J].建筑与文化,2016(12):232-237.
	[Huang Y, Sun Y D.Interpreting the rural settlement in the view of ecological aesthetics: A case study of traditional villages in Zhejiang[J].Architecture & Culture,2016(12): 232-237.]
[14]	李晓峰. 从生态学观点探讨传统聚居特征及承传与发展[J].华中建筑,1996(4):36-41.
	[Li X F.Discussion on the characteristics, inheritance and development of traditional settlements from the ecological point of view[J].Huazhong Architecture,1996(4):36-41.]
[15]	朱瑾,冯信群.传统村落整体环境空间中蕴涵的朴素生态精神—徽州村落环境特征研究[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计),2006,24(3):121-123.
	[Zhu J, Feng X Q.The simple ecological spirit implied in the traditional environmental village: A study on the characteristics of environment in villages of Huizhou[J]. Journal of Nanjing Art Institute (Fine Arts & Design), 2006,24(3):121-123.]
[16]	江文婷,胡振宇.中国传统村落的生态经验解析——以楠溪江中游古村落为例[J].住宅科技, 2011,31(10):42-45.
	[ Jiang W T, Hu Z Y. Analysis on ecological experience of traditional Chinese villages: Take the ancient villages in the middle reaches of Nanxi River as an example[J]. Housing Science, 2011,31(10):42-45.]
[17]	王小明. 传统村落价值认定与整体性保护的实践和思考[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社科版),2013,34(2):156-160.
	[Wang X M.Practice and thinking on value determination and integral protection of traditional villages[J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Science), 2013,34(2):156-160.]
[18]	杨豪中,韩怡. 陕北乡村传统建筑环境与乡土文化的整体性保护研究[J].中国园林,2011,27(10):85-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2011.10.027
	[Yang H Z, Han Y.Research on the integrity protection strategy of traditional architectural environment and local culture in Northern Shanxi countryside[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2011,27(10):85-88.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2011.10.027
[19]	柴斌. 基于复合生态系统的青海省兔尔干传统村落保护与发展策略研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
	[Chai B.Studies on Protection and Development Strategies of Qinghai Tu Ergan traditional villages based on compound ecosystem[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University Of Architecture And Technology, 2015.]
[20]	张瑜,贾艳飞,何依.传统平原堡寨村落整体性保护方法探究——以平遥古村落为例[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(4):104-110. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2015.04.017
	[Zhang Y, Jia Y F, He Y.Study on integrated conservation method of traditional plain Bao-village, taking Pingyao historic villages as an example[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015,22(4):104-110.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2015.04.017
[21]	宋玢,赵卿,王莉莉.城市边缘区传统村落空间的整体性保护方法——以富平县莲湖村为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2015,22(6):118-124.
	[Song B, Zhao Q, Wang L L.Study on the integrated conservation method of traditional village space in urban fringe areas: A case study of Lianhucun in Fuping Country, Shanxi[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015,22(6):118-124.]
[22]	毛靓. 生态生产性土地视角下的辽西地区村落生态基础设施研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2012.
	[Mao L.Study on rural ecological infrastructure in western Liaoning province from the perspective of ecological productive land[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2012.]
[23]	曾丽群,单国彬,朱鹏飞.传统村落生态环境评价与保护发展研究——以广西钦州市大芦村为例[J].环境与可持续发展,2015,40(6):61-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2015.06.015
	[Zeng L Q, Shan G B, Zhu P F.Evaluation and protective development of ecological environment of traditional villages: A case of Dalu village of Qinzhou city in Guangxi[J]. Environment and Sustainable Development, 2015,40(6):61-64.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-288X.2015.06.015
[24]	王兆印,王光谦,高菁.侵蚀地区植被生态动力学模型[J].生态学报,2003,23(1):98-105.
	[Wang Z Y, Wang G Q, Gao J.An ecological dynamics model of vegetation evolution in erosion area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003,23(1):98-105.]
[25]	林晨,周生路,吴绍华.30年来东南红壤丘陵区土壤侵蚀度时空演变研究——以长汀县为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(10):1235-1241.
	[Lin C, Zhou S L, Wu S H.Evolution of soil erosion degree in 30 years in Granite Hills, Southeastern China: A case study of Changting County, Fujian[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011,31(10):1235-1241.]
[26]	郑粉莉,唐克丽,张科利,等.自然侵蚀和人为加速侵蚀与生态环境演变[J].生态学报, 1995,15(3):251-259.
	[ Zheng F L, Tang K L, Zhang K L, et al. Relationship of eco-environmental change and natural erosion and man-made accelerated erosion[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1995,15(3):251-259.]
[27]	景可,陈永宗.黄土高原侵蚀环境与侵蚀速率的初步研究[J].地理研究,1983,2(2):1-11.
	[Jing K, Chen Y Z, Preliminary study of the erosion environment and rates on the Loess Plateau[J]. Geographical Research,1983,2(2):1-11.]
[28]	李有利,郑纲,杨景春.人类活动与土壤侵蚀[J].水土保持研究,1999,6(4):105-110.
	[Li Y L, Zheng G, Yang J C.Human activities and soil erosion[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 1999,6(4):105-110.]
[29]	王兆印,王光谦,李昌志,等.植被-侵蚀动力学的初步探索和应用[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2003,23(10):1013-1023. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.10.013
	[Wang Z Y, Wang G Q, Li C Z, et al.Preliminary exploration and application of vegetation-erosion kinetics[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2003,23(10):1013-1023.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.10.013
[30]	韩非,蔡建明.我国半城市化地区乡村聚落的形态演变与重建[J].地理研究,2011,30(7):1271-1284. doi: 10.11821/yj2011070013
	[Han F, Cai J M.The evolution and reconstruction of rural habitat of peri-urban in China[J]. Geographical Research, 2011,30(7):1271-1284.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011070013
[31]	郑艳婷,刘盛和,陈田.试论半城市化现象及其特征——以广东省东莞市为例[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):760-768, 812. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.06.011
	[Zheng Y T, Liu S H, Chen T.The characteristics of peri-urbanization region: A case study of Dongguan municipality in Guangdong province, Geographical Research, 2003,22(6):760-768,812.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2003.06.011
[32]	佘之祥,张亚芬.经济快速发展地区的农业与农村特点及发展问题——以长江三角洲、珠江三角洲为例[J].经济地理,2008,27(3):460-463.
	[She Z X, Zhang Y F.The characteristics and problems in the development of agriculture and rural areas for the areas of rapid economic development[J]. Economic Geography, 2008,27(3):460-463.]
[33]	张金兰,欧阳婷萍,朱照宇,等.基于景观生态学的广州城镇建设用地扩张模式分析[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(2):410-414. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.02.029
	[Zhang J L, Ouyang T P, Zhu Z Y, et al.Analysis on the expansion mode of urban built-up land of Guangzhou based on landscape ecology[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010,19(2):410-414.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2010.02.029
[34]	魏成,苗凯,黄铎,肖大威.传统村落基础设施综合评价体系研究——以珠江三角洲为例[J]. 城市与区域规划研究,2017(4):114-128.
	[Wei C, Miao K, Huang D, et al.Research on comprehensive evalution system for infrastructure of Chinese traditional villages: A case study of Pearl River Delta[J].Research on Urban and Regional Planning,2017(4):114-128.]

生态侵蚀程度	<10%	10%~20%	20%~40%	40%~60%	>60%
村落个数	15	10	9	9	2
村落名称	惠州市周田村、肇庆市扶溪村、肇庆市罗洪村、江门市良溪村、广州市莲塘村、江门市自力村、肇庆市孔洞村、肇庆市金林村、广州市钱岗村、江门市浮石村、肇庆市古蓬村、江门市歇马村、肇庆市杨池村、广州市新围村、广州市钟楼村	惠州市墨园村、东莞市江边村、惠州市范和村、肇庆市邓屋村、惠州市皇思扬村、佛山市大旗头村、广州市港头村、惠州市旭日村、广州市塱头村、肇庆市大屋村	中山市古鹤村、东莞市龙背岭村、广州市聚龙村、肇庆市白石村、深圳市鹏城村、惠州市绳武村、东莞市南社村、广州市小洲村、广州市瓜岭村	东莞市塘尾村、东莞市超朗村、中山市翠亨村、广州市沙湾北村、佛山市茶基村、佛山市松塘村、广州市黄埔村、广州市大岭村、惠州市茶园村	东莞市西溪村、佛山市碧江村

时段	Mean	Std.Dev	Max
1992-1997	0.2285	0.3041	1.0279
1997-2002	0.1859	0.2514	1.0803
2002-2007	0.1758	0.2316	1.0123
2007-2012	0.0910	0.1369	0.4228
2012-2015	0.0586	0.0848	0.2983

时段	Z score	P value	Type
1992-1997	4.32	<0.01	HH
1997-2002	5.98	<0.01	HH
2002-2007	3.63	<0.01	HH
2007-2012	0.321	0.74	Random
2012-2015	0.003	0.97	Random
1997-2015	5.50	<0.01	HH

演变模式	演变结果	典型村落
城镇建设外侵模式	外围城镇迅速推进,村落生态用地面积不断被蚕食	东莞市西溪村、东莞市超朗村、东莞市塘尾村、肇庆市白石村
村落建设扩张模式	村落内部建设用地增加,生态用地面积不断减少	佛山市松塘村、广州市大岭村、东莞市南社村、中山市翠亨村
区域性道路割裂模式	区域性道路交通建设,使得村落周边的生态网络与生态联系被交通割裂	广州市钟楼村、广州市钱岗村、东莞市龙背岭村、广州市瓜岭村
综合发展模式	村落面积减小,村建设用地大幅增加,原有生态用地锐减;城市生态修复活动使生态用地有所增加	广州市黄埔村、佛山市碧江村、佛山市茶基村、广州市沙湾北村

珠江三角洲传统村落生态侵蚀时空演变特征

Spatio-temporal Evolution and Model of Ecological Erosion in Traditional Villages in the Pearl River Delta

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 34

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	巫细波, 赖长强, 葛志专. 政府严控期我国地级市COVID-19疫情的时空集聚、演变及自相关效应研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 246-258.
[2]	张经度, 梅志雄, 吕佳慧, 陈进钊. 纳入空间自相关的FLUS模型在土地利用变化多情景模拟中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 531-542.
[3]	赵林峰, 刘小平, 刘鹏华, 陈广照, 何家律. 基于地理分区与FLUS模型的城市扩张模拟与预警[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 517-530.
[4]	林金煌, 陈文惠, 张岸. 2019年北京市PM_2.5人群暴露剂量特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2348-2357.
[5]	赵丹丹, 金声甜, 鲍丙飞, 张利国. 基于地理探测器的中国中部城市土地绿色利用效率时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2358-2370.
[6]	鲍超,刘若文. 青藏高原城镇体系的时空演变[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(9): 1330-1340.
[7]	李宁, 杨林, 沈姜威, 郑方子豪, 杨晴. 聚落遗址迁移最优路径模拟[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6): 836-843.
[8]	周日平. 中国荒漠化分区与时空演变[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 675-687.
[9]	郑斓, 任红艳, 施润和, 鲁亮. 珠江三角洲地区登革热流行风险空间模拟与预测[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(3): 407-416.
[10]	陈斌, 王宏志, 徐新良, 陈德超, 武新梅, 付阳阳. 武汉市主城区用地结构遥感监测及动态变化[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(2): 293-303.
[11]	王诚聪, 刘亚静, 刘明月. 全球恐怖袭击事件时空演变与态势分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(11): 1710-1720.
[12]	余红楚, 方志祥, 陆锋, 彭澎, 赵志远, 冯明翔. 重要经济发展区域间海运网络时空演变特性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(5): 582-592.
[13]	周翼, 谢保鹏, 陈英, 赵鸿雁, 裴婷婷. 基于灯光数据的中国县域城镇建设用地产出效率时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(12): 1733-1744.
[14]	周湘, 袁文, 李汉青, 马明清, 袁武. 北京市二手房价格时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(8): 1049-1059.
[15]	叶钰, 秦建新, 胡顺石. 长沙市热岛效应时空特征变化研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(4): 518-527.