地球信息科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (7): 983-993.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180328
• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 下一篇
陈杰1,2(), 李昂2, 符峥2, 李思倩2, 王结臣2,3,4,*(
)
收稿日期:
2018-07-13
修回日期:
2019-03-10
出版日期:
2019-07-25
发布日期:
2019-07-25
作者简介:
作者简介:陈 杰(1982-),男,山西曲沃人,博士生,讲师,主要从事GIS理论与应用研究。E-mail: <email>chenjie_301@126.com</email>
基金资助:
Jie CHEN1,2(), Ang LI2, Zheng FU2, Siqian LI2, Jiechen WANG2,3,4,*(
)
Received:
2018-07-13
Revised:
2019-03-10
Online:
2019-07-25
Published:
2019-07-25
Contact:
Jiechen WANG
Supported by:
摘要:
利用python程序语言开发了基于百度地图导航服务的批量路径时间查询平台,并结合最邻近设施时间和累积机会成本方法度量了居住单元与中心商业区(CBD)、与行政服务中心、与大型医院、与火车站、与飞机场的可达性;然后,着重对比分析了2种公交模式(有/无地铁)下公共服务设施可达性的差异。实验结果表明:① 与基于ArcGIS网络分析法等传统方法相比,基于“门到门”互联网路径规划服务API方法计算的出行时间成本能够较为精确、便捷地用于度量公共服务设施的可达性,避免了人工构建复杂路网数据集的工作量,而且更具时效性;② 融入地铁网络的公交模式不同程度上提升了居住单元至公共服务设施的可达性,尤其是地铁沿线“廊道”以及重要交通设施(如地铁站点)邻近区域最为显著;③ 居住单元至邻近CBD的可达性变化显著集中于0~30 min,30 min时间阈值内公交(有地铁)模式下累计的人口和面积分别是公交(无地铁)模式的1.7倍和2.2倍;④ 居住单元至邻近火车站的可达性变化显著集中于0~30 min以及30~60 min,30 min时间阈值内公交(有地铁)模式下累计的人口和面积分别是公交(无地铁)模式的8.9倍和3.0倍,60 min时间阈值内累计的人口和面积分别是公交(无地铁)模式的1.5倍和1.9倍;⑤ 居住单元至邻近飞机场的可达性变化显著集中于60~90 min以及90~120 min,90 min时间阈值内公交(有地铁)模式下累计的人口和面积分别是公交(无地铁)模式的12.6倍和6.6倍,120 min时间阈值内累计的人口和面积分别是公交(无地铁)模式的2.0倍和3.6倍;⑥ 居住单元至所属行政中心、至邻近大型医院的可达性在各个时间间隔及阈值范围内亦有相应幅度的改善。此外,运用本文的技术方法还可获得更完整、真实的其他交通模式(如汽车、电动车、自行车、步行等)接入城市公共服务设施的情形,为进一步研究非汽车模式下城市公共服务设施的可达性提供参考,促进城市公共交通可持续性的发展。
陈杰, 李昂, 符峥, 李思倩, 王结臣. 公交模式对公共服务设施可达性的影响[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(7): 983-993.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180328
Jie CHEN, Ang LI, Zheng FU, Siqian LI, Jiechen WANG. Accessibility of Public Service Facilities as Influenced by Public Transport Modes[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019, 21(7): 983-993.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180328
表1
2017年南京市BTT和MTT公交模式情景下居民至行政中心、CBDs、火车站、飞机场、医院可达性统计
间隔时段 | 行政中心 | CBD | 火车站 | 飞机场 | 医院 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(累计时间) | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | |||||||||||||||||||
/min | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | P | A | |||||||||
≤30 | 17.5 | 1.7 | 20.5 | 2.0 | 10.4 | 0.6 | 17.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26 | 1.4 | 33.2 | 1.8 | |||||||||
30~60 | 42.7 | 12.7 | 43.9 | 14.6 | 29.8 | 3.3 | 35.7 | 6.7 | 35.5 | 3.5 | 45.7 | 6.8 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 27.5 | 6.6 | 33.1 | 8.2 | |||||||||
60~90 | 22.9 | 27.0 | 21.4 | 28.4 | 17.9 | 7.1 | 18.8 | 14.6 | 23.8 | 7.3 | 20.4 | 13.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 14.6 | 5.5 | 15.9 | 10.9 | 18.6 | 13.9 | |||||||||
90~120 | 11.3 | 27.4 | 9.5 | 26.9 | 14.5 | 12.8 | 15.1 | 22.2 | 13.2 | 11.9 | 13.4 | 21 | 20.8 | 3.7 | 41.3 | 13.3 | 10.7 | 14.9 | 13.4 | 20.2 | |||||||||
>120 | 5.6 | 31.2 | 4.7 | 28.1 | 27.4 | 76.2 | 13.0 | 55.2 | 26.7 | 77.1 | 13.4 | 58 | 78 | 95.4 | 43.5 | 80.7 | 19.9 | 66.2 | 1.7 | 55.9 |
[1] |
Bowling A, Windsor J.Towards the good life: A population survey of dimensions of quality of life[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2001,2(1):55-82.
doi: 10.1023/A:1011564713657 |
[2] |
Kwok R C W, Yeh A G O. The use of modal accessibility gap as an Indicator for sustainable transport development[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2004,36(5):921-936.
doi: 10.1068/a3673 |
[3] |
Vicente P, Reis E.Profiling public transport users through perceptions about public transport providers and satisfaction with the public transport service[J]. Public Transport, 2016,8(3):1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s12469-015-0112-9 |
[4] | Cascetta E, Cartenì A, Montanino M.A new measure of accessibility based on perceived opportunities[J]. Sidt Scientific Semina, 2013,87:117-132. |
[5] |
Gutiérrez J.Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid-Barcelona-French border[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2001,9(4):229-242.
doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5 |
[6] |
Karou S, Hull A.Accessibility modelling: Predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014,35:1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.002 |
[7] |
Wu B M, Hine J P.A PTAL approach to measuring changes in bus service accessibility[J]. Transport Policy, 2003,10(4):307-320.
doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00053-2 |
[8] |
肖京格,周廷刚,姚林虎,等.重庆市交通网络的可达性时空特征及其演化规律[J].地球信息科学学报,2015,17(1):54-61.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.00054 |
[ Xiao J G, Zhou T G, Yao L H, et al.Spatial-temporal characteristics of Chongqing transport network accessibility and its evolution pattern[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2015,17(1):54-61. ]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.00054 |
|
[9] |
Kim H, Sultana S.The impacts of high-speed rail extensions on accessibility and spatial equity changes in South Korea from 2004 to 2018[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2015,45:48-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.007 |
[10] |
Jiao J, Wang J, Jin F, Dunford M.Impacts on accessibility of China's present and future HSR network[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2014,40(40):123-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.004 |
[11] | 蒋海兵,徐建刚,祁毅.京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响[J].地理学报,2010,65(10):1287-1298. |
[ Jiang H, Xu J, Qi Y.The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(10):1287-1298. ] | |
[12] | 马爱峦,张莉,赵英杰.陆路高速交通对长江三角洲城市群中心城市一日交流圈的影响[J].地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(1):114-120. |
[ Ma A L, Zhang L, Zhao Y J.The influence of land high-speed traffic on the daily communication area of center cities of urban agglomeration in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2018,34(1):114-120. ] | |
[13] | 蔡永龙,陈忠暖,刘松,等.快速铁路开通对海南岛空间可达性格局和空间公平性的影响[J].经济地理,2018,38(1):36-45. |
[ Cai Y L, Chen Z N, Liu S,et al. The impact of fast railway opened on accessibility patterns and spatial equity of Hainan Island space[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(1):36-45. ] | |
[14] |
Benenson I, Martens K, Rofé Y, Kwartler A.Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv Metropolitan Area[J]. Annals of Regional Science, 2011,47(3):499-515.
doi: 10.1007/s00168-010-0392-6 |
[15] |
Mavoa S, Witten K, Mccreanor T, O'Sullivan D. GIS based destination accessibility via public transit and walking in Auckland, New Zealand[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012,20(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.001 |
[16] | Xu K, Cui W.A GIS-based assessment of spatial accessibility to county hospitals: A case study of Dancheng county, China[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012,454-460. |
[17] | 但文羽,肖映辉,胡周灵,等.基于高斯两步移动搜寻法的村镇避难场所可达性研究[J].地球信息科学学报,2018,20(10):1412-1421. |
[ Dan W Y, Xiao Y H, Hu Z L, et al.Rural emergency shelter accessibility using Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area method[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018,20(10):1412-1421. ] | |
[18] | Fuglsang M, Hansen H S, Münier B.Accessibility analysis and modelling in public transport networks-a raster based approach[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011,207-224. |
[19] |
陶卓霖,程杨,戴特奇.北京市养老设施空间可达性评价[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(5):616-624.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.003 |
[ Tao Z, Cheng Y, Dai T Q.Measuring spatial accessibility to residential care facilities in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(5):616-624. ]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.003 |
|
[20] |
Jia T, Tao H, Qin K, et al.Selecting the optimal healthcare centers with a modified p-median model: A visual analytic perspective[J]. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2014,13(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-13-42 |
[21] | Kwon J H, Choi Y, Lee I.An alternative measure of public transport accessibility based on space syntax[M]. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006,281-291. |
[22] | 陈少沛,李勇,庄大昌,等.地铁网络可达性时空演化及空间形态分析[J].测绘科学,2018,43(3):123-130. |
[ Chen S P, Li Y, Zhuang D C, et al.Spatio-temporal evolution and spatial pattern analysis of metro network accessibility[J]. Science of Surveying & Mapping, 2018,43(3):123-130. ] | |
[23] | Li L, Ren H, Zhao S, et al.Two dimensional accessibility analysis of metro stations in Xi'an, China[J]. Transportation Research Part A Policy & Practice, 2017,106:414-426. |
[24] | An Y S, Jang S M, Lee S I.A study on the map of walk-and bicycle-access time to subway station using a shortest-part algorithm for Gangnam Area of Seoul[J]. Seoul Studies, 2011,12(3):129-140. |
[25] | Sohn K.Feature mapping the Seoul metro station areas based on a self-organizing map[J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2013,20(4):23-42. |
[26] | 王姣娥,焦敬娟,黄洁,等.交通发展区位测度的理论与方法[J].地理学报,2018,73(4):666-676. |
[ Wang J, Jiao J, Huang J, et al.Theory and methodology of transportation development and location measures[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):666-676. ] | |
[27] |
Djurhuus S, Hansen H S, Aadahl M, et al.Building a multimodal network and determining individual accessibility by public transportation[J]. Environment and Planning B, 2016,43(1):210-227.
doi: 10.1177/0265813515602594 |
[28] | Martin D, Wrigley H, Barnett S, et al.Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study[J]. Health & Place, 2002,8(1):3-13. |
[29] |
Martin D, Jordan H, Roderick P.Taking the bus: Incorporating public transport timetable data into health care accessibility modelling. Environment and Planning A, 2008,40(10):2510-2525
doi: 10.1068/a4024 |
[30] |
Jäppinen S, Toivonen T, Salonen M.Modelling the potential effect of shared bicycles on public transport travel times in Greater Helsinki: An open data approach[J]. Applied Geography, 2013,43:13-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.010 |
[31] |
Salonen M, Toivonen T.Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2013,31(31):143-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.011 |
[32] |
Páez, Antonio, Moniruzzaman M, Bourbonnais P L, et al. Developing a web-based accessibility calculator prototype for the Greater Montreal Area[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2013,58:103-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.020 |
[33] | European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Dataset [DB/OL]. . |
[34] | 曾文,向梨丽,李红波,等.南京市医疗服务设施可达性的空间格局及其形成机制[J].经济地理,2017,37(6):136-143. |
[ Zeng W, Xiang L L, Li H B, et al.Spatial pattern of access to health care facilities and its formation mechanism in Nanjing[J]. Economic Geography, 2017,37(6):136-143. ] | |
[35] | 肖琛,陈雯,袁丰,等.大城市内部连锁超市空间分布格局及其区位选择—以南京市苏果超市为例[J].地理研究,2013,32(3):465-475. |
[ Xiao C, Chen W, Yuan F, et al.Spatial pattern and location decision of chain supermarkets within large cities: A case study of Suguo supermarkets in Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 2013,32(3):465-475. ] |
[1] | 罗秋雨, 乐阳, 谷岩岩. 城市地铁出行知识图谱嵌入表达的超参数选择[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(6): 1164-1175. |
[2] | 刘垚明, 李宛静, 张修远, 张宇恒, 李然, 周琪. 基于多源开放数据的中国农村可达指数评估[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(4): 783-793. |
[3] | 高顺祥, 陈珍, 张志健, 陈越, 肖中圣, 邓进, 许奇. 骑行替代步行后公共交通可达性改善效果评估方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(3): 439-449. |
[4] | 唐璐, 许捍卫, 丁彦文. 融合多源地理大数据的城市街区综合活力评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(8): 1575-1588. |
[5] | 邝嘉恒, 邬群勇. 接驳地铁站的共享单车时空均衡性分析与吸引区域优化[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(7): 1337-1348. |
[6] | 钟家晖, 易芳蓉, 何正国, 程国荣, 黄铎. 基于弱势人群个体可达性评价的社区服务设施配置研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(5): 875-887. |
[7] | 黄洁, 石雯茜, 陈娱. 居民出行视角下的北京市双枢纽机场可达性研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(5): 914-924. |
[8] | 郭琛琛, 梁娟珠. 基于网络地图的多交通模式医疗设施可达性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(3): 483-494. |
[9] | 刘琳琳, 郑伯红, 骆晨. 基于交通大数据的南昌市中心城区等时圈划分及特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(2): 220-234. |
[10] | 黄盛, 李卫江, 朱梦茹, 刘振. 降雨事件对上海地铁通勤客流时空影响的精细尺度研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(2): 249-262. |
[11] | 肖中圣, 许奇, 毛保华, 魏润斌, 冯佳. 不同测算方法下行程时间不确定性对可达性的影响分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(11): 2102-2114. |
[12] | 赵洋, 徐枫, 万义良. 基于改进引力模型的公园绿地空间可达性及供需平衡分析方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(10): 1993-2003. |
[13] | 谭佩珊, 麦可, 张亚涛, 涂伟. 利用多源城市数据划定地铁站点吸引范围[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(4): 593-603. |
[14] | 廖心治, 王华, 赵万民. 融合地图数据的山地城市医疗设施服务覆盖评估方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(4): 604-616. |
[15] | 段梅花, 赵航, 龙立美, 欧仁教. 山地城市公交系统服务在老年人群体中分配公平性评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(4): 617-631. |
|