聚落遗址迁移最优路径模拟

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180540

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 836-843.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180540

• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 上一篇下一篇

聚落遗址迁移最优路径模拟

李宁¹(), 杨林^1,^2,^*(), 沈姜威¹, 郑方子豪¹, 杨晴¹

1. 南京师范大学虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室,南京 210023
2. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

收稿日期:2018-10-22 修回日期:2018-12-25 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-06-15
通讯作者: 杨林 E-mail:564031955@qq.com;yangcius@126.com
作者简介:
作者简介：李宁（1992-）,男,河南新乡人,硕士生,研究方向为考古GIS、GIS应用研究。E-mail: 564031955@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41471102）;国家自然科学基金重点项目（41631175）

Simulating the Optimal Migration Paths between Prehistoric Settlement Sites

Ning LI¹(), Lin YANG^1,^2,^*(), Jiangwei SHEN¹, Fangzihao ZHENG¹, Qing YANG¹

1. Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing 210023, China
2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

Received:2018-10-22 Revised:2018-12-25 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-15
Contact: Lin YANG E-mail:564031955@qq.com;yangcius@126.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41471102;Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41631175

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

古遗址作为古人生产、生活的重要场所和文化遗存,客观反映了在长期的人地关系相互作用下的地理空间特征及其分异情况,但是由于史前人类生产力水平低下,在聚落迁移或对周边资源探索中更多地考虑自然环境因素,这种行为符合“最优路径”的思想。本文旨在基于考古调查和基础地理数据,模拟构建古人在聚落选择上的迁移最优路径,探讨古人行为模式,重点研究成本数据确定和成本栅格数据的集成方法及最优路径应用分析。以长江中游新石器晚期的大溪文化、屈家岭文化、石家河文化为连续研究文化期,对其中1200多处遗址的基础地理数据和考古数据进行分析;选取高程、坡度/坡向、地形起伏度、距水系距离等自变量,基于二分类逻辑回归模型,构建研究区史前聚落遗址分布模型。为分析聚落群的时空演变,首先基于期望最大化方法（EM算法）和Voronoi方法对聚落遗址数据进行聚类划分聚落群的中心点的确定,选取分布模型中的自然因子系数作为权重计算成本栅格数据,进而模拟聚落遗址按时序迁移的最优路径。研究结果符合古人类在迁移过程中多考虑以最低成本从山谷、丘陵中穿行的基本规律。并对比已探明的聚落遗址信息,验证模拟的最优路径具有一定的合理性。本文提出的方法,避免了人为选择权重生成成本栅格所带来的仅依靠主观因素的局限,提高了考古研究的科学性,其研究方法和结论对于探究史前聚落遗址时空演变规律和人地关系有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 聚落遗址, 自然因子, 迁移, 分布模型, 最优路径, 长江中游地区, 时空演变

Abstract:

As the relics of the ancients for production and other activities, prehistoric settlement sites reflected objectively the strong geographical features and differentiation patterns of long-term human-environment interactions. Due to the low productivity of the ancients, more natural factors were likely taken into account in between-settlement migration and resource exploration around their residences, which was consistent with the idea of "optimal path." This paper aimed to simulate the optimal path of the ancients in migrating between settlement sites, and to explore their behavioral pattern based on archaeological and geographic data. We emphasized the determination of migration cost, the integration of cost raster layers, and the optimal path analysis. The basic geographical and archaeological data of more than 1200 sites of the sequential cultural period, involving Daxi, Qujialing, and Shijiahe Cultures in the late Neolithic period in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, were included for this study. Elevation, slope/slope direction, topographical relief, and distance from water were selected as the independent variables to analyze and construct the distribution model of the settlement sites in the study area, based on binary classification logistic regression model. To analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of the settlement groups, firstly, the clustering and centers of the settlement groups were identified based on the Expectation Maximization method and Voronoi algorithm; then, the natural factor coefficients in the distribution model were used as weights to generate the cost raster layers; lastly, the layers were input for simulating the optimal path of between-settlement migration constructed based on the cultural sequence. The results were consistent with the basic rule that the ancients were inclined to walk through valleys and hills in the process of migration at the lowest cost. The simulated path was proved reasonable when compared to the other available site information. The method proposed in this paper can address the limitation of relying on only subjective weighting in generating and integrating the cost raster layers, and can enhance the science of archaeological research. Our method and conclusion help explore the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of prehistoric settlement sites and human-environment relationship.

Key words: settlement sites, natural factors, migration, distribution model, optimal path, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, spatiotemporal evolution

李宁, 杨林, 沈姜威, 郑方子豪, 杨晴. 聚落遗址迁移最优路径模拟[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6): 836-843.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180540

Ning LI, Lin YANG, Jiangwei SHEN, Fangzihao ZHENG, Qing YANG. Simulating the Optimal Migration Paths between Prehistoric Settlement Sites[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019, 21(6): 836-843.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180540

图/表 10

图1

表1

表2

表3

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 18

[1]	王美玲,潘允辉.基于GIS与约束条件下的最优路径规划研究[J].北京理工大学学报,2016,36(8):851-856.
	[ Wang M L, Pan Y H.Research on optimal path planning with constraints based on GIS[J]. Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016,36(8):851-856. ]
[2]	原世伟,景海涛,李伟.基于GIS的现代物流管理系统设计与实现[J].测绘地理信息,2016,41(1):82-86.
	[ Yuan S W, Jing H T, Li W.Design and realization of modern logistics management system based on GIS[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 2016,41(1):82-86. ]
[3]	刘慧丽. 基于GIS的电力物资公司物流配送路径优化研究[D].北京:华北电力大学(北京),2016.
	[ Liu H L.Research on optimization of logistics distribution path of the power supplies[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University(Beijing), 2016. ]
[4]	吴风华,贾雪珊,侯金亮.最短路径分析在旅游信息系统中的应用[J].地理空间信息,2017,15(10):55-56.
	[ Wu F H, Jia X S, Hou J L.Application of the shortest path analysis in tourism information system[J]. Geospatial Information, 2017,15(10):55-56. ]
[5]	惠夕平. 地理信息系统支持下的鲁东南沿海地区史前至汉代聚落考古研究[D].济南:山东大学,2011.
	[ Hui X P.A study on the settlement archaeology in the coastal area of southeastern Shandong, China from prehistoric period to Han Dynasty supported by GIS[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2011. ]
[6]	Whitley T G, Hicks L M.A geographic information systems approach to understanding potential prehistoric and historic travel corridors[J]. Southeastern Archaeology, 2003,22(1):77-91.
[7]	倪金山. 山东沭河上游流域考古遗址预测模型[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(4):489-493. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.04.002
	[ Ni J S.Predictive model of archaeological sites in the upper reaches of Shuhe River in Shandong[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009,28(4):489-493. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.04.002
[8]	吴楷钊,吴波.基于空间相关的逻辑回归模型的城市扩展模拟[J].河南大学学报(自然版) ,2010,40(3):267-273.
	[ Wu K Z, Wu B.Simulation of urban expansion based on logistic regression with the consideration of spatial correlation[J].Journal of Henan University( Natural Science Edition ), 2010,40(3):267-273. ]
[9]	梁巧倩,蒙伟光,林良勋,等.基于逻辑回归模型的雷电潜势预报方法[J].广东气象,2011,33(4):44-46.
	[ Liang Q Q, Meng W G, Lin L X, et al.The method of lightning potential prediction based on logistic regression model[J].Guangdong Meteorology, 2011,33(4):44-46. ]
[10]	Kvamme K L.The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling[J]. Mathematics and information science in archaeology: A flexible framework, Studies in Modern Archaeology, 1990(3):297-305.
[11]	何介钧. 长江中游新石器时代文化[M].武汉:湖北教育出版社,2004.
	[ He J J.Neolithic culture in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[M]. Wuhan: Hubei Education Publishing House, 2004. ]
[12]	国家文物局.中国文物地图集:湖南分册[M].长沙:湖南地图出版社,1997.
	[ State Administration of Cultural Heritage. Chinese Cultural Relics Atlas: Hunan fascicle[M]. Changsha: Hunan Cartography Publishing House, 1997. ]
[13]	黄传懿. 中国文物地图集:湖北分册[M].西安:西安地图出版社,2002.
	[ Huang C Y.State sdministration of cultural heritage[M]. Xi'an: An atlas of chinese cultural relics: Hubei fascicle[M]. Xi'an Cartography Publishing House, 2002. ]
[14]	杨瑞霞. 中原地区数字环境考古研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
	[ Yang R X.Archaeological Study of Digital Environment in Central Plains[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2009. ]
[15]	笪浩波. 长江中游新石器时代文化与生态环境关系研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2009.
	[ Gu H B.The relationship between Neolithic culture and ecological environment in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[D]. Whuhan: Central China Normal University, 2009. ]
[16]	http://www.gscloud.cn.
[17]	乔文文,毕硕本,王启富,等.郑洛地区龙山文化遗址预测模型[J].测绘科学,2013,38(6):172-174.
	[ Qiao W W, Bi S B, Wang Q F, et al.Predictive model of archaeological sites of Longshan Culture in Zhengzhou-Luoyang area[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2013,38(6):172-174. ]
[18]	尚南,于丽君,聂跃平.采用逻辑回归的汾河流域遗址分布研究[J].测绘科学,2015,40(8):47-52.
	[ Shang N, Yu L J, Nie Y P.Study of distribution characteristics of archaeological sites in Fenhe River basin based on logistic regression[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2015,40(8):47-52. ]

遗址属性	描述	数据来源
高程坡度坡向地形起伏度	地形分析重要因子指示地表的形态起伏和结构特征受光照的面积一定区域内地表的平整度	DEM数据 DEM数据（坡度工具） DEM数据（坡向工具） DEM数据（表面工具）
距水系距离	遗址与水源的距离	DEM数据（水文分析）

文化类型	自变量		标准差	Z value	Pr(>\|Z\|)	显著性
大溪文化	常量	1.064	0.280	3.795	0.000	***
	高程	-3.672	1.846	-1.990	0.047	**
	坡向	-0.907	0.403	-2.248	0.024	**
	坡度	3.453	1.724	2.003	0.045	**
	距水系距离	-1.765	0.554	-3.184	0.001	***
	地形起伏度	-0.602	1.575	-0.382	0.025	**
屈家岭文化	常量	0.818	0.240	3.406	0.001	***
	高程	-2.321	1.531	-1.516	0.130
	坡向	-0.156	0.349	-0.447	0.655
	坡度	0.999	1.731	0.577	0.564
	距水系距离	-0.515	0.438	-1.177	0.239
	地形起伏度	-3.831	1.715	-2.234	0.025	**
石家河文化	常量	0.771	0.132	5.861	4.610e-09	***
	高程	-2.853	0.812	-3.511	0.000	***
	坡向	0.103	0.191	0.540	0.589
	坡度	4.408	0.852	5.174	2.290e-07	***
	距水系距离	-0.776	0.263	-2.956	0.003	***
	地形起伏度	-6.293	0.887	-7.095	1.290e-12	***

聚落遗址迁移最优路径模拟

Simulating the Optimal Migration Paths between Prehistoric Settlement Sites

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 18

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	巫细波, 赖长强, 葛志专. 政府严控期我国地级市COVID-19疫情的时空集聚、演变及自相关效应研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 246-258.
[2]	韦原原, 江南, 陈云海, 李响, 杨振凯. 顾及时空对象空间相互作用的疫情风险评估建模与应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 274-283.
[3]	林金煌, 陈文惠, 张岸. 2019年北京市PM_2.5人群暴露剂量特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2348-2357.
[4]	赵丹丹, 金声甜, 鲍丙飞, 张利国. 基于地理探测器的中国中部城市土地绿色利用效率时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2358-2370.
[5]	郭子慧, 刘伟. 深度学习和遥感影像支持的矢量图斑地类解译真实性检查方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(10): 2051-2061.
[6]	鲍超,刘若文. 青藏高原城镇体系的时空演变[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(9): 1330-1340.
[7]	周日平. 中国荒漠化分区与时空演变[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 675-687.
[8]	陈斌, 王宏志, 徐新良, 陈德超, 武新梅, 付阳阳. 武汉市主城区用地结构遥感监测及动态变化[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(2): 293-303.
[9]	王诚聪, 刘亚静, 刘明月. 全球恐怖袭击事件时空演变与态势分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(11): 1710-1720.
[10]	庞海洋, 孔祥生, 贺正洋, 苏晓强. 山东半岛降雪时空分布特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(11): 1721-1734.
[11]	赵心怡, 蒲英霞. 区域人口迁移时空溢出效应与动力机制分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(6): 817-826.
[12]	余红楚, 方志祥, 陆锋, 彭澎, 赵志远, 冯明翔. 重要经济发展区域间海运网络时空演变特性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(5): 582-592.
[13]	黄铎, 孙莹, 张世君, 魏成. 珠江三角洲传统村落生态侵蚀时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(3): 340-350.
[14]	周翼, 谢保鹏, 陈英, 赵鸿雁, 裴婷婷. 基于灯光数据的中国县域城镇建设用地产出效率时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(12): 1733-1744.
[15]	周湘, 袁文, 李汉青, 马明清, 袁武. 北京市二手房价格时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(8): 1049-1059.