地缘经济合作背景下的中国磨憨-老挝磨丁口岸地区建设用地扩张

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.190053v

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (10): 1576-1585.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.190053v

• 地理空间分析综合应用 • 上一篇下一篇

地缘经济合作背景下的中国磨憨-老挝磨丁口岸地区建设用地扩张

肖池伟^1,^2,³,饶滴滴^1,²,刘怡媛³,封志明^1,^2,⁴,李鹏^1,^2,^*()

^1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
^2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
^3. 江西师范大学地理与环境学院,南昌 330022
^4. 自然资源部资源环境承载力评价重点实验室,北京 101149

收稿日期:2019-02-11 修回日期:2019-04-10 出版日期:2019-10-25 发布日期:2019-10-29
通讯作者: 李鹏 E-mail:lip@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:肖池伟(1991-),男,湖北荆州人,博士,主要从事资源遥感、边境土地利用与地缘政治经济关系研究。E-mail: xiaocw@igsnrr.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41971242);中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所“秉维”优秀青年人才计划(2018RC201);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA20010201);鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室开放基金项目(PK2019005)

Construction Land Expansion in the Mohan-Boten Port Area between China and Laos in the Geoeconomic Cooperation Context

XIAO Chiwei^1,^2,³,RAO Didi^1,²,LIU Yiyuan³,FENG Zhiming^1,^2,⁴,LI Peng^1,^2,^*()

^1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
^2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^3. College of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
4 Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 101149, China

Received:2019-02-11 Revised:2019-04-10 Online:2019-10-25 Published:2019-10-29
Contact: LI Peng E-mail:lip@igsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971242);Program for BINGWEI Excellent Young Talents of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences(2018RC201);Strategic Pilot Science and Technology Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Category A)(XDA20010201);Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University(PK2019005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

20世纪90年代以来,在地缘经济合作机制的影响下,作为中南半岛唯一的内陆国家,老挝边境地区正在经历以建设用地扩张为主的土地利用与覆被变化（LUCC）。本文以中老磨憨-磨丁口岸为例,基于2016年2月-2018年11月10期Sentinel-2 A/B 10 m分辨率遥感影像,利用面向对象与分类后目视修改相结合方法提取2016-2018年磨憨-磨丁口岸15 km缓冲带的建设用地分布信息,并分析了建设用地的时空变化及国别差异。研究结果表明：① 中老磨憨-磨丁口岸地区经历了阶段性快速发展,由2016年年初的1098.8 hm ²激增到2018年年底的2238.8 hm ²,增加了1140.0 hm ²,其中50.8%的新增建设用地集中在海拔800~1000 m,80.9%在坡度20°以下;② 中国磨憨口岸侧建设用地占研究区建设用地的比重从63.3%递减至54.8%,但仍占规模优势,由695.4 hm ²猛增到1226.7 hm ²,平均增幅6.7%;③ 老挝磨丁口岸侧建设用地增加近1.5倍,从403.4 hm ²剧增到1012.1 hm ²,平均增幅11.1%,占比由36.7%递增到45.2%。可见,日益发展的地缘经济合作是推动中老两国边境地区（特别是口岸）土地利用变化的主要诱因。

关键词: 土地利用与覆被变化, 建设用地扩张, 面向对象分类, 地缘经济合作, 磨憨-磨丁口岸, 边境地区, Sentinel-2

Abstract:

Since the 1990s, driven by the geoeconomic cooperation mechanisms, Laos, the only land-locked country in mainland Southeast Asia, has been experiencing rapid land use/cover change (LUCC) dominated by expansion of construction land, especially in its borderlands with adjacent countries (e.g. China). Taken the Mohan-Boten Port between China and Laos as the study area, a total of ten Sentinel-2 A/B 10m spatial resolution images (with none or little cloud coverage) from February 2016 to November 2018 were used to map the construction land through object-oriented classification and post-classification visual adjustments. The spatio-temporal change pattern and national difference of construction land in a 15 km buffer area of the Mohan-Boten Port, were analyzed and revealed via spatial and statistical analyses with ArcGIS 10.x software. Results showed that: (1) The area of construction land increased rapidly from 1098.8 hm ² in early 2016 to 2238.8 hm ² by the end of 2018 in the Mohan-Boten Port area. In particular, about 50.8% of the newly established construction land were located at elevations between 800 m and 1000 m and 80.9% on slopes below 20°. (2) During 2016-2018, the area of construction land increased from 695.4 hm ² to 1226.7 hm ² in the Mohan Port, with a growing rate of ca. 6.7%, while the proportion of the total area of construction land declined from 63.3% to 54.8%. (3) The construction land significantly increased by 1.5 times in the adjacent area of Boten Port, i.e., from 403.4 hm ² to 1012.1 hm ² in the same period and grew at an average rate of 11.1%. Moreover, the proportion of construction land increased from 36.7% to 45.2%, increased by 8.5% in the study area. We concluded that the developing geoeconomic cooperation is a dominant factor for land use change in the borderland between China and Laos, especially in the port area.

Key words: Land Use/Cover Change (LUCC), construction land expansion, object-oriented classification, geoeconomic cooperation, Mohan-Boten Port, border regions, Sentinel-2

肖池伟,饶滴滴,刘怡媛,封志明,李鹏. 地缘经济合作背景下的中国磨憨-老挝磨丁口岸地区建设用地扩张[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(10): 1576-1585.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.190053v

XIAO Chiwei,RAO Didi,LIU Yiyuan,FENG Zhiming,LI Peng. Construction Land Expansion in the Mohan-Boten Port Area between China and Laos in the Geoeconomic Cooperation Context[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019, 21(10): 1576-1585.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.190053v

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 33

[1]	郭来喜 . 中国对外开放口岸布局研究[J]. 地理学报, 1994,49(5):385-393.
	[ Guo L X . Distribution of ports in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1994,49(5):385-393. ]
[2]	Dayley R, Neher C D. Southeast Asia in the new international era (The fifth edition)[J]. Boulder,Colorado: Westview Press, 2013,352.
[3]	Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P . Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011,108(9):3465-3472.
[4]	Perz S G, Qiu Y L, Xia Y B , et al. Trans-boundary infrastructure and land cover change: Highway paving and community-level deforestation in a tri-national frontier in the Amazon[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013,34:27-41.
[5]	Tang D M, Fan H, Yang K , et al. Mapping forest disturbance across the China-Laos border using annual Landsat time series[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018,40(8):2895-2915.
[6]	李秋萍, 陆汝成, 李冠 , 等. 边境土地利用变化及其与贸易发展互动关系研究进展[J]. 中国土地科学, 2015,29(8):16-23.
	[ Li Q P, Lu R C, Li G , et al. Research progress on regional Land-use change along national border and it's interactive relationship with frontier trade development[J]. China Land Science, 2015,29(8):16-23. ]
[7]	宋涛, 刘卫东, 李玏 . 国外对地缘视野下边境地区的研究进展及其启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(3):276-285.
	[ Song T, Liu W D, Li L . International research on the border regions with a geopolitical perspective and revelation[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(3):276-285. ]
[8]	Zeng Z Z, Estes L, Ziegler A D , et al. Highland cropland expansion and forest loss in Southeast Asia in the twenty-first century[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2018,11(8):556-562.
[9]	Liu X N, Feng Z M, Jiang L G , et al. Rubber plantation and its relationship with topographical factors in the border region of China, Laos and Myanmar[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013,23(6):1019-1040.
[10]	Xiao C W, Li P, Feng Z M . Monitoring annual dynamics of mature rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna during 1987-2018 using Landsat time series data: A multiple normalization approach[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo-information, 2019,77:30-41.
[11]	李鹏, 封志明 . 地缘经济背景下的老挝橡胶林地扩张监测及其影响研究综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016,35(3):286-294. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.003
	[ Li P, Feng Z M . Review of remote sensing monitoring and socioeconomic and environmental impacts of rubber plantation expansion in Laos in the geoeconomic context[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(3):286-294. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.003
[12]	Liao C H, Feng Z M, Li P , et al. Monitoring the spatio-temporal dynamics of swidden agriculture and fallow vegetation recovery using Landsat imagery in northern Laos[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015,25(10):1218-1234.
[13]	Ziegler A D, Fox J M, Webb E L , et al. Recognizing contemporary roles of swidden agriculture in transforming landscapes of Southeast Asia[J]. Conservation Biology, 2011,25(4):846-848.
[14]	Dressler W, Wilson D, Clendenning J , et al. Examining how long fallow swidden systems impact upon livelihood and ecosystem services outcomes compared with alternative land-uses in the uplands of Southeast Asia[J]. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2015,7(2):210-229.
[15]	Li P, Feng Z M, Jiang L G , et al. A review of swidden agriculture in Southeast Asia[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014,6(2):1654-1683.
[16]	Kuemmerle T, Radeloff V C, Perzanowski K , et al. Cross-border comparison of land cover and landscape pattern in Eastern Europe using a hybrid classification technique[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006,103(4):449-464.
[17]	肖池伟, 李鹏, 封志明 , 等. 1976-2013年老挝主要农作物种植结构时空演变特征分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2017,26(6):31-40.
	[ Xiao C W, Li P, Feng Z M , et al. Spatio-temporal change of primary crops in Laos during 1976-2013[J]. World Regional Studies, 2017,26(6):31-40. ]
[18]	Soto-Berelov M, Madsen K D . Continuity and distinction in land cover across a rural stretch of the US-Mexico border[J]. Human Ecology, 2011,39(4):509-526.
[19]	Röder A, Pröpper M, Stellmes M , et al. Assessing urban growth and rural land use transformations in a cross-border situation in Northern Namibia and Southern Angola[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015,42:340-354.
[20]	Chanhda H, Wu C F, Ye Y M , et al. GIS based land suitability assessment along Laos-China border[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2010,21(3):343-349.
[21]	Grogan K, Pflugmacher D, Hostert P , et al. Cross-border forest disturbance and the role of natural rubber in mainland Southeast Asia using annual Landsat time series[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015,169:438-453.
[22]	Ye S, Rogan J, Sangermano F . Monitoring rubber plantation expansion using Landsat data time series and a Shapelet-based approach[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2018,136:134-143.
[23]	Broich M, Hansen M, Potapov P , et al. Patterns of tree-cover loss along the Indonesia-Malaysia border on Borneo[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013,34(16):5748-5760.
[24]	廖谌婳, 封志明, 李鹏 , 等. 缅老泰交界地区刀耕火种农业的时空变化格局[J]. 地理研究, 2014,33(8):1529-1541.
	[ Liao C H, Feng Z M, Li P , et al. The spatio-temporal variation of shifting cultivation in the border region of Myanmar, Laos and Thailand[J]. Geographical Research, 2014,33(8):1529-1541. ]
[25]	Li P, Feng Z M . Extent and area of swidden in montane mainland Southeast Asia: Estimation by multi-step thresholds with Landsat-8 OLI data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016,8(1):44-60.
[26]	Drusch M, Del Bello U, Carlier S , et al. Sentinel-2: ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012,120:25-36.
[27]	陆大道, 杜德斌 . 关于加强地缘政治地缘经济研究的思考[J]. 地理学报, 2013,68(6):723-727.
	[ Lu D D, Du D B . Some thoughts on the strengthening of geopolitical and geo-economic studies[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(6):723-727. ]
[28]	Tachikawa T, Hato M, Kaku M, et al. The characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2[C]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS Vancouver, Canada, 2011: 24-29.
[29]	Xiao C W, Li P, Feng Z M . Re-delineating mountainous regions with three topographic parameters in Mainland Southeast Asia using ASTER GDEM[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2018,15(8):1728-1740.
[30]	Xiao C W, Feng Z M, Li P , et al. Evaluating the suitability of different terrains for sustaining human settlements according to the local elevation range in China using the ASTER GDEM[J]. Journal of Mountain Sciences, 2018,15(12):2741-2751.
[31]	方朝阳, 邬浩, 陶长华 , 等. 鄱阳湖南矶湿地景观信息高分辨率遥感提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016,18(6):847-856. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2016.00847
	[ Fang C Y, Wu H, Tao C H , et al. The wetland Information extraction research of Nanji wetland in Poyang Lake based on high resolution remote sensing image[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2016,18(6):847-856. ] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2016.00847
[32]	单治彬, 孔金玲, 张永庭 , 等. 面向对象的特色农作物种植遥感调查方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018,20(10):1509-1519.
	[ Shan Z B, Kong J L, Zhang Y T , et al. Remote sensing investigation method of object-oriented crops with special characteristics[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018,20(10):1509-1519. ]
[33]	汤玲英, 刘雯, 杨东 , 等. 基于面向对象方法的Sentinel-1ASAR在洪水监测中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018,20(3):377-384.
	[ Tang L Y, Liu W, Yang D , et al. Flooding monitoring application based on the object-oriented method and Sentinel-1A SAR data[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018,20(3):377-384. ]

序号	影像获取时间	云量/%	序号	影像获取时间	云量/%
1	2016-02-12	0.0	6	2018-02-16	0.0
2	2016-10-19	1.7	7	2018-02-21	1.2
3	2016-12-08	6.3	8	2018-02-26	0.6
4	2017-04-27	3.1	9	2018-03-03	0
5	2017-12-23	11.6	10	2018-11-03	0.0

地缘经济合作背景下的中国磨憨-老挝磨丁口岸地区建设用地扩张

Construction Land Expansion in the Mohan-Boten Port Area between China and Laos in the Geoeconomic Cooperation Context

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	张志慧, 刘雯, 李笑含, 朱靖轩, 张洪涛, 杨东, 徐超昊, 徐宪立. 基于无人机航摄影像的喀斯特地区裸岩信息提取及景观格局分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2436-2444.
[2]	刘怡媛, 李鹏, 肖池伟, 刘影, 谢正磊. 老挝北部Sentinel-2 A/B云覆盖适宜阈值界定及其影像获取概率时空差异[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(11): 2267-2276.
[3]	王林江, 吴炳方, 张淼, 邢强. 关键生育期冬小麦和油菜遥感分类方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(7): 1121-1131.
[4]	田富有, 吴炳方, 曾红伟, 何昭欣, 张淼, JoséBofana. 基于多层神经网络与Sentinel-2数据的大豆种植区识别方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6): 918-927.
[5]	李中元, 吴炳方, 张淼, 邢强, 李名勇, 闫娜娜. 利用物候差异与面向对象决策树提取油菜种植面积[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 720-730.
[6]	杜保佳, 张晶, 王宗明, 毛德华, 张淼, 吴炳方. 应用Sentinel-2A NDVI时间序列和面向对象决策树方法的农作物分类[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 740-751.
[7]	何昭欣, 张淼, 吴炳方, 邢强. Google Earth Engine支持下的江苏省夏收作物遥感提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 752-766.
[8]	宋晓阳, 黄耀欢, 董东林, 张飞. 融合数字表面模型的无人机遥感影像城市土地利用分类[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(5): 703-711.
[9]	方灿莹, 胡秀娟, 徐涵秋, 王美雅, 林中立. 不同城市规划的生态质量差异对比研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(8): 1097-1107.
[10]	陈天博, 胡卓玮, 魏铼, 胡顺强. 无人机遥感数据处理与滑坡信息提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(5): 692-701.
[11]	关舒婧, 韩鹏鹏, 王月如, 韩宇, 易琳, 周廷刚, 陈劲松. 华南地区典型种植园地遥感分类研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(11): 1538-1546.
[12]	方灿莹, 王琳, 徐涵秋. 不同植被红边指数在城市草地健康判别中的对比研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(10): 1382-1392.
[13]	郭昱杉, 刘庆生, 刘高焕, 黄翀. 基于标记控制分水岭分割方法的高分辨率遥感影像单木树冠提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(9): 1259-1266.
[14]	方朝阳, 邬浩, 陶长华, 高丹, 周华. 鄱阳湖南矶湿地景观信息高分辨率遥感提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(6): 847-856.
[15]	吴田军, 骆剑承, 沈占锋, 夏列钢, 徐楠. 高分辨率遥感土地覆盖分类技术的应用研究——以重庆市黔江贫困区为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(3): 353-361.