2003—2018年中国地级城市土地出让交易状况及时空动态特征

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190487

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (9): 1823-1836.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190487

• 地理空间分析综合应用 • 上一篇下一篇

2003—2018年中国地级城市土地出让交易状况及时空动态特征

张小东¹^,²(), 韩昊英²^,^*(), 陈宇²

1.塔里木大学水利与建筑工程学院, 阿拉尔 843300
2.浙江大学建筑工程学院, 浙江大学城乡规划理论与技术研究所, 杭州 310012

收稿日期:2019-09-03 修回日期:2019-11-18 出版日期:2020-09-25 发布日期:2020-11-25
通讯作者: 韩昊英 E-mail:21712250@zju.edu.cn;hanhaoying@zju.edu.cn
作者简介:张小东（1988— ）,男,重庆开州人,硕士,主要从事城市区域规划与区域发展研究。E-mail:21712250@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51778560)

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Right Assignment Transactions in Prefecture-Level Cities of China from 2003 to 2018

ZHANG Xiaodong¹^,²(), HAN Haoying²^,^*(), CHEN Yu²

1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Institute of Urban and Rural Planning Theories and Technologies, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310012, China

Received:2019-09-03 Revised:2019-11-18 Online:2020-09-25 Published:2020-11-25
Contact: HAN Haoying E-mail:21712250@zju.edu.cn;hanhaoying@zju.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(51778560)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文结合2003—2018年中国土地市场网的土地出让数据,利用核密度分析、冷热区分析和空间可视化等方法,对土地出让空间分布、出让土地来源和用途等要素进行对比研究,总结出中国地级市土地出让的空间结构分布特征。研究结果显示：① 2003—2013年全国土地出让增速明显,2013年后土地出让总量增速放缓,但土地出让收入在持续增长,土地出让整体呈现出“量变到值变转化”的特征;② 2003—2018年用地出让构成变化趋势为：道路与交通设施用地、绿地与广场用地出让占比增长较为明显,居住用地、商业用地、公共管理与公共服务设施用地出让占比稳定,工业用地、物流仓储用地和公用设施用地出让占比增速开始放缓,并呈现出收缩趋势;2003—2018年土地出让来源差异显著,主要来源于新增建设用地,对存量用地的再开发利用率较低,盲目的外向扩张不利于新型城镇化建设;③ 2003—2018年土地出让呈现出“点-线-面”的空间演变特征,形成了多核心、层级分明的圈层空间结构,展现出“核密度重心由北向南、由西向东转移”、“核心城市高度集聚、外围城市密集、区（县）稀疏”的空间演进特征;其中,不同用地也呈现出不同的空间演进特征：工业用地出让增速由东北地区向全国扩张后,逐步向华东沿海城市收缩,并呈现出“由一般城市到省会城市,再到其周边城市”的空间演变特征;居住用地出让面积由省会城市带动周边城市增长,增长到一定程度,逐渐向华南和华东中心城市收缩;商业用地出让较为稳定,未出现收缩现象、增速较为均衡;其他建设用地出让面积分布覆盖范围较均衡,也反映出全国基础设施建设土地资源配置比较均衡。

关键词: 土地出让, 空间结构, 演进特征, 土地来源, 土地用途, 土地政策, 影响因素, 中国

Abstract:

Using the data of China's land use right assignmentons from 2003 to 2018, the paper visualized the spatial distribution, source, and use of land right assignment, and analyzed the spatial characteristics. The methods of the research included the nuclear density analysis, nuclear density analysis, Getis-Ord, and spatial visualization. The results are as follows: (1) From 2003 to 2013, the growth rate of land use rights assignment in China was remarkable. The growth rate of the total land use rights assignment slowed down after 2013, but the income of land use rights assignment continued to grow, and it showed changing characteristics from quantity to value. (2) The growth of land for roads and transportation facilities, greenland and square was more prominent; the land use for residential commercial, public management and public service facilities was stable; while the growth rate of land for industrial, logistics, storage, and public facilities began to slow down and showed a contraction trend. There were significant differences in the sources of land use right assignment between 2003 and 2018. The main source was the new construction, while the utilization rate of the redevelopment of the stock land was low, and the blind outward expansion was not conducive to the new urbanization construction. (3) From 2003 to 2018, the land use right assignment showed a "point-line-surface" spatial pattern, forming a multi-core, hierarchical layer structure. Over time, the core of nuclear density had shifted from north to south and from west to east, with high concentration of core cities, dense peripheral cities, and sparse districts/counties". Among them, different land uses also presented different spatial evolution characteristics. After the growth rate of industrial land use right assignment expanded from the northeast region to the whole country, it gradually contracted to the coastal urban agglomerations in East China, and presented the spatial evolution characteristics of “from ordinary cities to provincial capitals, and from provincial capitals to cities around provincial capitals.” The land area for residential uses was that the provincial capitals drove the growth of surrounding cities to a certain extent, and gradually shrunk to the central cities of South and East China. Commercial land use right assignment was relatively stable; there was no shrinkage, and the growth rate was relatively balanced. The coverage of other construction land use right assignment areas was relatively balanced, which also reflects the relatively balanced allocation of resources for infrastructure construction in China.

Key words: land use right assignment, spatial structure, evolution feature, land source, land use, land policy, influencing factor, China

张小东, 韩昊英, 陈宇. 2003—2018年中国地级城市土地出让交易状况及时空动态特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1823-1836.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190487

ZHANG Xiaodong, HAN Haoying, CHEN Yu. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Right Assignment Transactions in Prefecture-Level Cities of China from 2003 to 2018[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2020, 22(9): 1823-1836.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2020.190487

图/表 9

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 52

[1]	王悦. 官员更替与地方政府土地出让价格[D]. 厦门:厦门大学, 2018.
	[ Wang Y. The turnover of officials and the price of land transfer by local government[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2018. ]
[2]	Harris C D, Ullman E L. The nature of cities[J]. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1945,24(2):7-17.
[3]	Mcmillen D P. One hundred fifty years of land values in chicago: A nonparametric approach[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1966,40(1):100-124.
[4]	Chen A M. Urbanization and disparities in china: challenges of growth and development[J]. China Economic Review, 2002,13(PII S1043-951X(02)00098-64):407-411.
[5]	Tang C. Performance evaluation of rural tourism land transfer based on dea model[J]. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech, 2017,28(3):347-351.
[6]	Duesberg S, Bogue P, Renwick A. Retirement farming or sustainable growth - land transfer choices for farmers without a successor[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017,61:526-535.
[7]	Colyer D, Templeton M. Land transfers, values assessments for west-virginia, 1968-69[J]. West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin, 1977(651):3-45.
[8]	Tang J, Zhai W L, Cao H Q. Changing characteristics of land use and ecological service value in the water source region of the middle route of south-to-north water transfer project[M]. IOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science, Bristol: Iop Publishing Ltd, 2017. 81.
[9]	Qiao Y, Li M S. Research on price prediction of the land transfer based on the maximum entropy method[M]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, Stafa-Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2012.209-211, 1521-1526.
[10]	Zhang H, Gao F. How to achieve marketization of rural land transfer[M]. Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, Paris: Atlantis Press, 2015. 41, 402-405.
[11]	Linkous E R. Transfer of development rights and urban land markets[J]. Environment and Planning, 2017,49(5):1122-1145.
[12]	Banner S. Conquest by contract: Wealth transfer and land market structure in colonial new zealand[J]. Law & Society Review, 2000,34(1):47-96.
[13]	Qiu Y, Tian J X, Wang J J. The research of chinese urban land transfer mechanism[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2009, 1184-1187.
[14]	Xu H, Zhao Y, Tan R, et al. Does the policy of rural land rights confirmation promote the transfer of farmland in china?[J]. Acta Oeconomica, 2017,67(4):643-660.
[15]	Luo D. Research on the status quo and countermeasures of rural land transfer system in hubei province[M]. Irvin:Sci Res Publ, Inc-Srp, 2012, 947-951.
[16]	Borras S M. Can redistributive reform be achieved via market-based voluntary land transfer schemes? Evidence and lessons from the philippines[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2005,41(1):90-134.
[17]	Roy V. Land transfer tax policy regime and its influence on property markets: Analysing the land transfer tax policy of kerala in the last decade[M]. India Studies in Business and Economics, Springer India, 2017: 89-103.
[18]	Perera A C. Interests in land and transfer of land[M]. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002, 55-67.
[19]	Carter M R, Yao Y. Local versus global separability in agricultural household models: The factor price equalization effect of land transfer rights[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2002,84(3):702-715.
[20]	Liu J Y, Liu M L, Zhuang D F, et al. Study on spatial pattern of land-use change in china during 1995-2000[J]. Science in China Series D-Earth Sciences, 2003,46(4):373.
[21]	Liu J, Zhang Z, Xu X, et al. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in china during the early 21 ^st century [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010,20(4):483-494.
[22]	刘纪远, 张增祥, 庄大方, 等. 20世纪90年代中国土地利用变化时空特征及其成因分析[J]. 地理研究, 2003,22(1):1-12.
	[ Liu J Y, Zhang Z X, Zhuang D F, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics and causes of land use change in China in the 1990s[J]. Geographical Research, 2003,22(1):1-12. ]
[23]	刘纪远, 匡文慧, 张增祥, 等. 20世纪80年代末以来中国土地利用变化的基本特征与空间格局[J]. 地理学报, 2014,69(1):3-14.
	[ Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z X, et al. Basic characteristics and spatial pattern of land use change in China since the late 1980s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(1):3-14. ]
[24]	冉建波, 陈兴伟. 土地利用空间格局的置换变化与代换变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2015,17(6):661-667.
	[ Ran J B, Chen X W. Analysis of replacement change and substitution change of land use spatial pattern[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2015,17(6):661-667. ]
[25]	刘纪远, 宁佳, 匡文慧, 等. 2010-2015年中国土地利用变化的时空格局与新特征[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(5):789-802.
	[ Liu J Y, Ning J, Kuang W H, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern and new characteristics of land use change in China from 2010 to 2015[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(5):789-802. ]
[26]	宋戈, 王盼盼, 王越, 等. 黑龙江省巴彦县土地利用类型变化特征及其空间格局分异[J]. 经济地理, 2015,35(3):163-170.
	[ Song G, Wang P P, Wang Y, et al. Characteristics of land use change and spatial pattern differentiation in Bayan County, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2015,35(3):163-170. ]
[27]	王思远, 张增祥, 周全斌, 等. 近10年中国土地利用格局及其演变[J]. 地理学报, 2002,57(5):523-530.
	[ Wang S Y, Zhang Z X, Zhou Q B, et al. Land use pattern and its evolution in China in recent 10 years[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002,57(5):523-530. ]
[28]	刘纪远, 张增祥, 徐新良, 等. 21世纪初中国土地利用变化的空间格局与驱动力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2009,64(12):1411-1420.
	[ Liu J Y, Zhang Z X, Xu X L, et al. Spatial pattern and driving forces of land use change in China in the early 21 ^st century [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(12):1411-1420. ]
[29]	刘纪远, 刘明亮, 庄大方, 等. 中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2002,32(12):1031-1040.
	[ Liu J Y, Liu M L, Zhuang D F, et al. Spatial pattern analysis of recent land use change in China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2002,32(12):1031-1040. ]
[30]	王盼盼, 宋戈. 1979—2015年松嫩高平原土地利用格局变化及影响因子分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018,34(2):256-264.
	[ Wang P P, Song G. Land use pattern change and impact factor analysis in Songnen high plain from 1979 to 2015[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(2):256-264. ]
[31]	徐升艳, 陈杰, 赵刚. 土地出让市场化如何促进经济增长[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(3):44-61.
	[ Xu S Y, Chen J, Zhao G. How does the marketization of land transfer promote economic growth[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(3):44-61. ]
[32]	李明超. 城市土地征收、储备、出让改革联动述论[J]. 西部论坛, 2017,27(5):54-63.
	[ Li M C. Interaction of urban land expropriation, reserve and transfer reform[J]. Western Forum, 2017,27(5):54-63. ]
[33]	朱丽娜, 石晓平. 中国土地出让制度改革对地方财政收入的影响分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010,24(7):23-29.
	[ Zhu L N, Shi X P. Analysis of the impact of land transfer system reform on local fiscal revenue in China[J]. China Land Science, 2010,24(7):23-29. ]
[34]	聂雷, 郭忠兴, 钟国辉, 等. 转型期中国土地出让收入和价格的演变规律——基于财政分权与经济目标的视角[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2015,36(6):78-84.
	[ Nie L, Guo Z X, Zhong G H, et al. Evolution law of land transfer income and price in China during the transitional period: from the perspective of fiscal decentralization and economic objectives[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2015,36(6):78-84. ]
[35]	邹秀清, 田娜. 中国土地财政的区域差异与演进过程——基于287个地级市的面板数据[J]. 资源科学, 2015,37(11):2162-2171.
	[ Zou X Q, Tian N. Regional differences and evolution of land finance in China: Based on panel data of 287 prefecture-level cities[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(11):2162-2171. ]
[36]	张立彦. 土地出让收入的区域差异分析[J]. 改革与战略, 2008(4):17-19.
	[ Zhang L Y. Regional difference analysis of land transfer income[J]. Reformation & Strategy, 2008(4):17-19. ]
[37]	张绍良, 侯湖平, 公云龙, 等. 中国土地市场地价监管新体系构建[J]. 中国土地科学, 2011,25(8):8-14.
	[ Zhang S L, Hou H P, Gong Y L, et al. Construction of a new land market price supervision system in China[J]. China Land Science, 2011,25(8):8-14. ]
[38]	李珽, 符文颖, 李郇. GIS支持下的珠江三角洲核心区建设用地遥感分析[J]. 中国土地科学, 2013,27(9):78-84.
	[ Li Q, Ru W Y, Li Z. Gis-supported remote sensing analysis of construction land in the Pearl River Delta core area[J]. China Land Science, 2013,27(9):78-84. ]
[39]	孙雁, 刘志强, 王秋兵, 等. 1910年以来沈阳城区土地利用空间格局变化[J]. 中国土地科学, 2012,26(9):41-47.
	[ Sun Y, Liu Z Q, Wang Q B, et al. Changes of land use spatial pattern in Shenyang urban area since 1910[J]. China Land Science, 2012,26(9):41-47. ]
[40]	黎夏. 珠江三角洲发展走廊1988-1997年土地利用变化特征的空间分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2004,19(3):307-315.
	[ Li X. Spatial analysis of land use change characteristics in the Pearl River Delta Development Corridor from 1988 to 1997[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004,19(3):307-315. ]
[41]	郭洪峰, 许月卿, 吴艳芳. 基于地形梯度的土地利用格局与时空变化分析——以北京市平谷区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2013,33(1):160-166.
	[ Guo H F, Xu Y Q, Wu Y F. Analysis of land use pattern and temporal-spatial change based on topographic gradient: A case study of Pinggu District, Beijing[J]. Economic Geography, 2013,33(1):160-166. ]
[42]	谭永忠, 吴次芳, 牟永铭, 等. 经济快速发展地区县级尺度土地利用空间格局变化模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006,22(12):72-77.
	[ Tan Y Z, Wu C F, Mou Y M, et al. Simulation of land use spatial pattern change at county level in rapidly developing regions[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2006,22(12):72-77. ]
[43]	赵爱栋, 马贤磊, 曲福田, 等. 基于资源价值显化视角的中国工业用地市场发育水平及其影响因素[J]. 资源科学, 2016,38(2):217-227.
	[ Zhao A D, Ma X L, Qu F T, et al. Development level of China's industrial land market and its influencing factors from the perspective of resource value manifestation[J]. Resources Science, 2016,38(2):217-227. ]
[44]	刘继来, 刘彦随, 李裕瑞. 中国“三生空间”分类评价与时空格局分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017,72(7):1290-1304.
	[ Liu J L, Liu Y S, Li Y R. Classification and evaluation of "Sansheng Space" in China and analysis of space-time pattern[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(7):1290-1304. ]
[45]	牟燕, 钱忠好. 地方政府土地财政依赖一定会推高城市一级土地市场化水平吗?——基于2003—2015年中国省级面板数据的检验[J]. 中国土地科学, 2018,32(10):8-13.
	[ Mou Y, Qian Z H. Will the financial dependence of local governments on land certainly push up the level of land marketization at the urban level? - Based on the provincial panel data from 2003 to 2015[J]. China Land Science, 2018,32(10):8-13. ]
[46]	Mack Y P, Rosenblatt M. Multivariate K-Nearest Neighbor Density Estimates[J]. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1979,9(1):1-15.
[47]	张小东, 韩昊英, 舒贤帆. 基于热力图数据的杭州商业综合体活力影响因素分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019,21(11):1745-1754.
	[ Zhang X D, Han H Y, Shu X F. Influencing factors on the vitality of five commercial complexes in Hangzhou: Based on the heat maps analysis[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019,21(11):1745-1754. ]
[48]	杨兴柱, 朱跃 .王群. 黄山市土地出让区位选择空间特征与影响因素研究[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(6):1435-1450.
	[ Yang X Z, Zhu Y, Wang Q. Study on spatial characteristics and influencing factors of land transfer location selection in Huangshan City[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(6):1435-1450. ]
[49]	Li H. An empirical analysis of the effects of land-transfer revenues on local governments' spending preferences in china[J]. China-an International Journal, 2016,14(3):29-50.
[50]	王世联. 中国城镇住房保障制度思想变迁研究(1949-2005)[D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2006.
	[ Wang S L. A study on the changes of urban housing security system in China(1949-2005)[D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2006. ]
[51]	李涛. 城市土地市场运行与政策控管研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2004.
	[ Li T. Research on urban land market operation and policy control and management[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2004. ]
[52]	吕冬敏, 王兴平. 市场经济体制下服务业用地分类原则探讨——兼评《城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准(gb50137-2011)》[J]. 现代城市研究, 2012,27(10):82-87.
	[ Lv D M, Wang X P. A Discussion on the principles of classification of land for service industry under the market economy system: Comments on the code for classification of urban land use and planning standards of development land (GB50137-2011). Modern Urban Research, 2012,27(10):82-87. ]

省/市	项目名称	项目位置	面积/hm²	土地来源	土地用途	供地方式	行业分类	土地级别	成交价格/ 万元	合同签订日期
广东省阳江市	工业项目	北惯镇325国道北边及金田七路西边	0.71	新增建设用地	工业用地	挂牌出让	金属制品业	三级	284.00	2017-11-09
浙江省宁波市	高新区公园与绿地	宁波国家高新区	5.41	新增建设用地(来自存量库)	公园与绿地	划拨	公共设施管理业	五级	10 151.25	2018-12-26
陕西省宝鸡市	文曲商业街	高新七路以西、宝钛以东、渭滨大道以北	0.04	现有建设用地	住宿餐饮用地	挂牌出让	餐饮业	九级	140.00	2018-12-24
湖南省娄底市	娄底市顺发房地产开发有限公司	长青西街南侧、甘桂路东侧	2.72	现有建设用地	其它普通商品住房用地	挂牌出让	房地产业	九级	6000.00	2018-01-18
…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…	…

2003—2018年中国地级城市土地出让交易状况及时空动态特征

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Use Right Assignment Transactions in Prefecture-Level Cities of China from 2003 to 2018

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	方云皓, 顾康康. 基于多元数据的中国地理空间疫情风险评估探索——以2020年1月1日至4月11日COVID-19疫情数据为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 284-296.
[2]	薛浩男, 张雪英, 吴明光, 曹天阳. 基于新闻数据的新冠疫情事件下“全球-中国”国际关系变化分析方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 351-363.
[3]	高楹, 宋辞, 郭思慧, 裴韬. 接驳地铁站的共享单车源汇时空特征及其影响因素[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(1): 155-170.
[4]	张亚, 刘纪平, 周亮, 王勇, 李鹏飞. 基于DBSCAN算法的北京市顺丰快递服务设施集群识别与空间特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1630-1641.
[5]	宋荣, 胡业翠. 中国城市土地整治综合潜力分区与提升路径[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(7): 1522-1531.
[6]	孙威, 林晓娜. 柳州市汽车制造业企业的空间格局与影响因素[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1216-1227.
[7]	吴康敏, 王洋, 叶玉瑶, 张虹鸥. 广州市零售业态空间分异影响因素识别与驱动力研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1228-1239.
[8]	湛东升, 谢春鑫, 张文忠, 丁亮, 许婧雪, 甄茂成. 基于累计机会可达性的北京城市公共服务设施复合功能识别[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1320-1329.
[9]	刘权毅, 詹庆明, 刘稳, 杨晨. 基于铁路客流的湖北省城市网络关联与空间组织结构特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(5): 1008-1022.
[10]	周琦, 高长春. 城市创意产业空间动态集聚演化的计算与可视优化方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(5): 1033-1048.
[11]	朱亚茹, 高峻, 邴振华, 张中浩, 付晶. 基于参与式制图方法的景观服务评估与空间结构研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(5): 1106-1119.
[12]	刘纪远, 张增祥, 张树文, 颜长珍, 吴世新, 李仁东, 匡文慧, 史文娇, 黄麟, 宁佳, 董金玮. 中国土地利用变化遥感研究的回顾与展望——基于陈述彭学术思想的引领[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 680-687.
[13]	张永树, 杨振凯, 訾璐, 曹一冰, 余航. 中国艾滋病空间格局和时空演化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(2): 198-206.
[14]	杜培培, 侯西勇. 基于多源数据的中国海岸带地区人口空间化模拟[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(2): 207-217.
[15]	李文梁, 汪驰升, 朱武. 中国大陆地区TanDEM-X 90 m DEM误差空间分布特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2277-2288.