基于改进SVM分类法的SAR图像水体面积提取研究

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210095

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 940-948.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210095

基于改进SVM分类法的SAR图像水体面积提取研究

邱凤婷¹^,²^,³^,⁵(), 过志峰¹^,³^,^*(), 张宗科¹^,³, 魏显虎¹^,³, 景睦馨⁴

1.中国科学院空天信息创新研究院,北京 100094
2.中国科学院大学电子电气与通信工程学院,北京 100049
3.中国科学院中国—斯里兰卡水技术研究与示范联合中心,北京 100085
4.宾夕法尼亚州立大学工程学院, 宾夕法尼亚州 16802
5.中国四维测绘技术有限公司,北京 100094

收稿日期:2021-02-24 修回日期:2021-04-01 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-07-25
通讯作者: * 过志峰（1976— ）,男,安徽合肥人,副研究员,主要研究方向为地表参数定量反演及自然灾害遥感。E-mail: guozf@aircas.ac.cn
作者简介:邱凤婷（1994— ）,女,江苏宿迁人,硕士生,主要研究方向为资源环境遥感。E-mail: qiuft@aircas.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院中国—斯里兰卡水技术研究与示范联合中心项目

Water Body Area Extraction from SAR Image based on Improved SVM Classification Method

QIU Fengting¹^,²^,³^,⁵(), GUO Zhifeng¹^,³^,^*(), ZHANG Zongke¹^,³, WEI Xianhu¹^,³, Jing Muxin⁴

1. Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, Beijing 100049, China
3. China-Sri Lanka Joint Center for Water Technology Research and Demonstration by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
4. The Pennsylvania State University, engineering college, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
5. China Siwei Surveying and Mapping Technology Company Limited, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2021-02-24 Revised:2021-04-01 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-07-25
Supported by:
Program of China-Sri Lanka Joint Center for Water Technology Research and Demonstration by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China-Sri Lanka Joint Center for Education and Research by the CAS

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在复杂地表环境下的多云多雨地区,基于合成孔径雷达（SAR）图像提取水体时容易受到其它地物如水田、山体阴影等干扰,传统的灰度阈值法和SVM法未能考虑水体与其它地物在纹理和地形上的差异,因此水体提取结果精度较差。研究首先用Refined Lee滤波对SAR图像进行预处理;其后通过DEM建模和坡度计算提取地形特征,通过计算图像灰度共生矩阵以提取纹理特征（包括均匀性、角二阶矩和熵）,并结合SAR图像极化信息以及SDWI指数形成针对水体提取的特征空间,通过融合地形特征和图像纹理特征发展了改进SVM 分类法的水体提取模型。在使用Sentinel-1 SAR数据对所发展模型与SDWI水体指数法、传统SVM法水体提取结果进行比对后发现,改进SVM分类法提取的水体结果较好地剔除了水田和山体阴影,且提取的水体水面比传统的SVM法更加完整;该方法在总体精度、Kappa系数、漏分率和错分率指标上均优于SDWI法和传统的SVM法,总体精度达到98.06%,比SDWI法和传统的SVM法分别提高了23.24%和5.49%,有效提高了复杂环境下地表水体的提取精度。研究最后将所发展模型应用于2018年马哈韦利河流域逐月水体提取与变化分析,有效解决了山体阴影和水田误分问题。本文提出的改进SVM法可以实现复杂地表环境下大范围水体信息准确、完整提取。

关键词: SVM, 复杂水环境, Sentinel-1 SAR数据, 水体提取, SDWI, 地形特征, 纹理特征, 斯里兰卡马哈韦利河流域

Abstract:

In cloudy and rainy regions with complex surface environments, water body extraction based on Synthesis Aperture Radar (SAR) image is easily interfered by other surface features such as paddy field and mountain shadow. The traditional gray threshold method and SVM method fail to take into account the differences in texture and terrain information between water and other surface features, resulting in the low accuracy of water body extraction. In this paper, we first use refined Lee filter to pre-process the SAR image, then extract terrain features by modeling DEM and calculating the slope information. We extract the texture features, including the homogeneity (hom), Angular Second Moment (ASM), and entropy (ENT), by calculating image Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) based on the SAR image. Meanwhile, polarization band information of the SAR image and SDWI index are combined to form the SVM feature space for water body extraction. Finally, an improved SVM classification method for water body extraction is proposed by fusing terrain features with image texture features. Compared with SDWI water index method and traditional SVM method based on Sentinel-1 SAR data, it is found that the improved SVM method can remove the shadows of paddy field and mountain. The result of water surface extraction by the improved SVM method is more complete than that of traditional SVM method. The result also shows that the improved SVM method performs better than SDWI method and traditional SVM method in terms of overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, leakage rate, and error rate. The overall accuracy of the improved SVM method is 98.06%, which is 23.24% and 5.49% higher than that of SDWI method and traditional SVM method, respectively, demonstrating that the improved SVM method can effectively improve the extraction accuracy of surface water in complex environments. The developed method is applied to monthly water extraction and change analysis of Mahaweli River Basin in 2018, which proves that the method can effectively solve the problems of mountain shadow and paddy field misclassification. The improved SVM method can realize the accurate and complete large-scale water body information extraction in complex surface environments.

Key words: SVM, complex water environment, Sentinel-1 SAR data, water extraction, SDWI, terrain features, texture features, Sri Lanka Mahaweli River Basin

邱凤婷, 过志峰, 张宗科, 魏显虎, 景睦馨. 基于改进SVM分类法的SAR图像水体面积提取研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(5): 940-948.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210095

QIU Fengting, GUO Zhifeng, ZHANG Zongke, WEI Xianhu, Jing Muxin. Water Body Area Extraction from SAR Image based on Improved SVM Classification Method[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24(5): 940-948.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210095

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

参考文献 19

[1]	李丹, 吴保生, 陈博伟, 等. 基于卫星遥感的水体信息提取研究进展与展望[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 60(2):147-161.
	[ Li D, Wu B S, Chen B W, et al. Review of water body information extraction based on satellite remote sensing[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2020, 60(2):147-161. ] DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.22.038 doi: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.22.038
[2]	周鹏, 谢元礼, 蒋广鑫, 等. 遥感影像水体信息提取研究进展[J]. 遥感信息, 2020, 35(5):9-18.
	[ Zhou P, Xie Y L, Jiang G X, et al. Advances on water body information extraction from remote sensing imagery[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2020, 35(5):9-18. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3177.2020.05.002 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3177.2020.05.002
[3]	曾玲方, 李霖, 万丽华. 基于Sentinel-1卫星SAR数据的洪水淹没范围快速提取[J]. 地理信息世界, 2015, 22(5):100-103,107.
	[ Zeng L F, Li L, Wan L H. SAR-based fast flood mapping using sentinel-1 imagery[J]. Geomatics World, 2015, 22(5):100-103,107. ] DOI: 1672-1586(2015)05-0100-04 doi: 1672-1586(2015)05-0100-04
[4]	Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1):62-66. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
[5]	Kiani H, Safabakhsh R, Khadangi E. Fast recursive segmentation algorithm based on Kapur's entropy [C]//2009 2nd International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication. IEEE, 2009:1-6. DOI: 10.1109/IC4.2009.4909269 doi: 10.1109/IC4.2009.4909269
[6]	崔倩, 毛旭东, 陈德清, 等. 基于高分三号卫星数据的水体自动提取及应用[J]. 中国农业信息, 2019, 31(5):57-65.
	[ Cui Q, Mao X D, Chen D Q, et al. Research on automation and operationality in water extraction based on GF-3[J]. China Agricultural Informatics, 2019, 31(5):57-65. ] DOI: 10.12105/j.issn.1672-0423.20190506 doi: 10.12105/j.issn.1672-0423.20190506
[7]	李景刚, 黄诗峰, 李纪人. ENVISAT卫星先进合成孔径雷达数据水体提取研究——改进的最大类间方差阈值法[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2010, 19(3):139-145.
	[ Li J G, Huang S F, Li J R. Research on extraction of water body from ENVISAT ASAR images: A modified Otsu threshold method[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2010, 19(3):139-145. ] DOI: 10.13577/j.jnd.2010.0323 doi: 10.13577/j.jnd.2010.0323
[8]	陈媛媛, 郑加柱, 魏浩翰, 等. 基于Sentinel-1A数据的南京市水体信息提取[J]. 地理空间信息, 2020, 18(9):62-65,7.
	[ Chen Y Y, Zheng J Z, Wei H H, et al. Water information extraction of Nanjing city based on sentinel-1A data[J]. Geospatial Information, 2020, 18(9):62-65,7. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2020.09.014 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2020.09.014
[9]	湛南渝, 李小涛, 路京选, 等. 基于SLIC的哨兵1号雷达数据水体信息提取[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(4):213-217,225.
	[ Zhan N Y, Li X T, Lu J X, et al. Water body information extraction by Sentinel-1 radar data based on SLIC[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(4):213-217,225. ] DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2020.04.036 doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2020.04.036
[10]	贾诗超, 薛东剑, 李成绕, 等. 基于Sentinel-1数据的水体信息提取方法研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(2):213-217.
	[ Jia S C, Xue D J, Li C R, et al. Study on new method for water area information extraction based on Sentinel-1 data[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(2):213-217. ] DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.02.038 doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.02.038
[11]	巩钰, 杨雨晴. 基于Sentinel-1 SAR影像的洪水淹没范围快速提取与变化分析[A]. 江苏省测绘地理信息学会.江苏省测绘地理信息学会2020年学术年会论文集[C]. 江苏省测绘地理信息学会:《现代测绘》编辑部, 2020: 4.
	[ Gong Y, Yang Y Q. Rapid extraction and change analysis of flood inundation range based on sentinel-1 SAR image[A]. Jiangsu society of Surveying and mapping geographic information. Proceedings of the 2020 academic annual meeting of Jiangsu society of Surveying and mapping geographic information[C]. Jiangsu society of Surveying and mapping geographic information: Editorial Department of modern surveying and mapping, 2020: 4. ] DOI: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.037980 doi: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.037980
[12]	骆剑承, 周成虎, 梁怡, 等. 支撑向量机及其遥感影像空间特征提取和分类的应用研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2002, 6(1):50-55.
	[ Luo J C, Zhou C H, Liang Y, et al. Support Vector Machine for Spatial Feature Extraction andClassification of Remotely Sensed Imagery[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002, 6(1):50-55. ] DOI: 1007-4619(2002)01-0050-07 doi: 1007-4619(2002)01-0050-07
[13]	Vohra R, Tiwari K C. Comparative analysis of SVM and ANN classifiers using multilevel fusion of multi-sensor data in urban land classification[J]. Sensing and Imaging, 2020, 21(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11220-020-00280-9 doi: 10.1007/s11220-020-00280-9
[14]	Chang C C, Lin C J. Libsvm[J]. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2011, 2(3):1-27. DOI: 10.1145/1961189.1961199 doi: 10.1145/1961189.1961199
[15]	Haralick R M, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1973, SMC- 3(6):610-621. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314
[16]	安智晖, 余洁, 刘利敏. 结合纹理信息的极化SAR影像分类研究[J]. 地理空间信息, 2016, 14(2):41-43,8.
	[ An Z H, Yu J, Liu L M. Polarimetric SAR images classification research combined with texture information[J]. Geospatial Information, 2016, 14(2):41-43,8. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2016.02.015 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4623.2016.02.015
[17]	Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M, et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 202:18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
[18]	程贇. 基于Sentinel-1的南极冰盖冻融探测方法研究[D]. 西安:西安科技大学, 2019.
	[ Cheng Y. Study of Antarctic snowmelt detection methods using Sentinel-1 data[D]. Xian An University of Science and Technology, 2019. ]
[19]	Minas K P, Frank G D, Edward M H. Bridging the rice yield gap in Asia-Pacific region[R]. Rome: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 2000:135-145.

时间	VH波段数	VV波段数
2018年1月	6	6
2018年2月	4	4
2018年3月	4	4
2018年4月	6	6
2018年5月	9	9
2018年6月	4	4
2018年7月	4	4
2018年8月	4	4
2018年9月	6	6
2018年10月	4	4
2018年11月	6	6
2018年12月	4	4

方法	非水体		水体		总体精度/%	Kappa系数
方法	漏分率/%	错分率/%	漏分率/%	错分率/%	总体精度/%	Kappa系数
SDWI法	37.23	0.19	0.24	43.58	74.82	0.52
传统SVM法	6.27	4.83	9.84	12.58	92.57	0.83
本文方法	2.76	0.12	0.24	5.43	98.06	0.96

基于改进SVM分类法的SAR图像水体面积提取研究

Water Body Area Extraction from SAR Image based on Improved SVM Classification Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	姚锦一, 王卷乐, 严欣荣, 魏海硕, Altansukh Ochir, Davaadorj Davaasuren. 基于深度神经网络的蒙古国色楞格河流域水体信息提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(5): 1009-1017.
[2]	林偲蔚, 陈楠, 刘奇祺, 贺卓文. 基于DEM小流域复杂网络的黄土高原地貌自动识别研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(4): 657-672.
[3]	李志红, 李旺平, 王玉, 陈璐, 郁林, 周兆叶, 郝君明, 吴晓东, 李传华. 基于离散粒子群算法的2种新型水体提取方法的对比与验证[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(6): 1106-1117.
[4]	蒋圣, 汤国安, 杨昕, 熊礼阳, 钱程扬. 基于DEM的黄土高原地形纹理概念模型[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(6): 959-968.
[5]	乔丹玉, 郑进辉, 鲁晗, 邓磊. 面向不同环境背景的Landsat影像水体提取方法适用性研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(4): 710-722.
[6]	黄楠, 杨昕, 刘海龙. 基于等高线空间关系的鞍部点提取方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 410-421.
[7]	曹泽涛, 方子东, 姚瑾, 熊礼阳. 基于随机森林的黄土地貌分类研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 452-463.
[8]	何红术, 黄晓霞, 李红旮, 倪凌佳, 王新歌, 陈崇, 柳泽. 基于改进U-Net网络的高分遥感影像水体提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(10): 2010-2022.
[9]	方莉娜, 黄志文, 罗海峰, 陈崇成. 结合SVM与图匹配的车载激光点云道路标线识别[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(7): 994-1008.
[10]	李玉, 杨蕴, 赵泉华. 结合改进的降斑各向异性扩散和最大类间方差的SAR图像水体提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6): 907-917.
[11]	李健锋, 叶虎平, 张宗科, 孔金玲, 魏显虎, Somasundaram Deepakrishna, 王法溧. 基于Landsat影像的斯里兰卡内陆湖库水体时空变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 781-788.
[12]	杨浩, 孟娜, 王婧, 郑燕, 赵莉. 基于支持向量机的京津冀城市群热环境时空形态模拟[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(2): 190-200.
[13]	周岩, 董金玮. 陆表水体遥感监测研究进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(11): 1768-1778.
[14]	张沁雨,李哲,夏朝宗,陈健,彭道黎. 高分六号遥感卫星新增波段下的树种分类精度分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(10): 1619-1628.
[15]	王雪峰, 冯雪, 苏奋振, 张宇, 王武霞, 蒋会平. 基于纹理和空间特征的中分辨率影像滨海水产养殖用地提取研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(5): 694-702.