AutoPaCA:耦合过程-模式的城镇空间增长模拟模型

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210421

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 87-99.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210421

• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 上一篇下一篇

AutoPaCA:耦合过程-模式的城镇空间增长模拟模型

戴云哲¹^,²(), 杨建新³^,⁵^,^*(), 龚健³^,⁵, 叶菁³^,⁵, 李靖业³, 李云⁴

1.湖北经济学院碳排放权交易湖北省协同创新中心,武汉 430205
2.湖北经济学院低碳经济学院,武汉 430205
3.中国地质大学（武汉）公共管理学院,武汉 430074
4.青海省国土空间规划研究院,西宁 810006
5.自然资源部法治研究重点实验室,武汉 430074

收稿日期:2021-07-23 修回日期:2021-10-12 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-03-25
通讯作者: * 杨建新（1988— ）,男,湖北鄂州人,副教授,主要从事土地变化模拟和生态系统服务评估相关研究。E-mail: yangjianxin@cug.edu.cn
作者简介:戴云哲（1990— ）,男,湖北恩施人,讲师,研究方向为土地资源评价与规划。E-mail: efflorescence@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42101275);国家自然科学基金项目(42071254);国家自然科学基金项目(41871172)

AutoPaCA: Coupling Process and Spatial Pattern to Simulate Urban Growth

DAI Yunzhe¹^,²(), YANG Jianxin³^,⁵^,^*(), GONG Jian³^,⁵, YE Jing³^,⁵, LI Jingye³, LI Yun⁴

1. Center of Hubei Cooperative Innovation for Emissions Trading System, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
2. School of Low Carbon Economics, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
3. China School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
4. Institute of Territorial Space Planning in Qinghai Province, Xining 810006, China
5. Key laboratory of the Ministry of Land and Resources Law Evaluation, Wuhan 430074, China

Received:2021-07-23 Revised:2021-10-12 Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-03-25
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42101275);National Natural Science Foundation of China(42071254);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871172)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

理解城镇增长过程、模式、机理并预判未来发展趋势,对优化城镇空间布局,促进城市可持续发展有重要意义。元胞自动机模型（Cellular Automata, CA）是研究城镇增长过程、模式的有效技术手段,但传统CA模型对城镇增长过程和空间模式的协同考虑不足。本研究构建了基于斑块（Patch）的城镇CA模型AutoPaCA,实现对城镇增长过程及空间模式的协同表征和精细控制,将城镇增长过程分为边缘增长和跳跃增长两种形式,并实现了对不同形式下城镇斑块位置、形状和面积大小的精细控制,同时考虑城镇空间模式的集聚性、整体形态及空间约束。此外,还提出使用景观格局分析法分析历史时期城镇增长过程和模式,并结合遗传算法实现对模型参数的地域化自动校正,降低人为主观因素对模拟结果的影响。将模型应用于长沙市1995—2035年的城镇增长模拟与多情景分析。结果表明,构建的AutoPaCA模型可以取得较好的模型精度,200次模拟结果的互异邻域相似性指数均值达到0.486;在生态保护情景下,长沙市城市内部生态结构保存完好,且表现出更为明显的长株潭一体化趋势,说明本研究提出的AutoPaCA模型及参数校正方法是有效的。

关键词: 元胞自动机, 斑块, 过程-模式耦合, 城镇增长, 空间约束, 随机森林, 遗传算法, 长沙市

Abstract:

Unplanned urban sprawl has largely altered the territorial space of the planet. Fragmented natural habitats, shifting biomes, and altered nutrient cycling are a few examples of the repercussions of the uncontrolled global urban growth. Therefore, understanding the feature, mechanism, and future pathways of urban dynamics is of great importance for optimizing urban structure and morphology, and thus promoting sustainable urban development. Cellular Automata (CA) model has been recognized as an effective tool in the planner's packet to facilitate this understanding, and to help make informed decisions on urban development. Given the insufficient consideration on the process and spatial pattern of urban growth in traditional CA models, this study proposes a patch-based CA model for urban growth simulating, which is entitled AutoPa CA. The proposed AutoPaCA model couples the spatiotemporal process and pattern to simulate urban growth. It divides the urban development process into two different processes: the edge diffusion which represents organic urban growth and the leapfrog development which represents spontaneous urban growth. The AutoPaCA model introduces a parameterized self-organizing approach to fine control the location, shape, and size of newly generated urban patches. To be specific, both the organic and spontaneous patch-generation function yield new urban patches using two consecutive steps: Seeding and self-growing. The seeding procedure locates the pivot cell of new patch with a pruning and random selection operation based on the urban development suitability surface which is estimated using a random forest model. The self-growing procedure creates an urban patch with given size using a neighborhood-scanning operation in which a parameter is introduced to control the shape of the patch. The size of urban patches is assumed to follow a lognormal distribution. The shape controlling parameter is within the range of [0, 2], with values larger than 1 generating circle-like shape and values smaller than 1 generating elongated shape. In addition, the proposed model employs analysis methods in discipline of landscape ecology to scrutinize the characteristics of urban growth in historical periods, based on which a cutting-edge genetic algorithm is applied to achieve localized calibration of key parameters in the model. At the same time, the rigid limitation and elastic guiding effect of ecological protection on urban development are also considered in the simulation. The application of the AutoPaCA model in Changsha, China presented high simulation accuracy. The average value of the Reciprocal Similarity Comparison Index of 200 simulations in the model validation period reached 0.486, which attests the feasibility and applicability of the model.

Key words: Cellular Automata, Patch, Process-pattern Coupling, Urban Growth, Spatial Constraint, Random Forest, Genetic Algorithm, Changsha city

戴云哲, 杨建新, 龚健, 叶菁, 李靖业, 李云. AutoPaCA:耦合过程-模式的城镇空间增长模拟模型[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(1): 87-99.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210421

DAI Yunzhe, YANG Jianxin, GONG Jian, YE Jing, LI Jingye, LI Yun. AutoPaCA: Coupling Process and Spatial Pattern to Simulate Urban Growth[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24(1): 87-99.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210421

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

表1

AutoPaCA参数初始值、取值范围及优化值

参数			初始值	值域	优化值
每次循环中新开发城镇建设用地的面积a/hm²			2000	[1000, 3000]	2014.45
每次循环中边缘增长的面积比例β			0.79	[0.5, 1]	0.63
斑块面积和形状参数	边缘增长	均值 $e edge$ /hm²	92.89	[35.51, 150.27]	32.72
		方差 $va r edge$ /hm²	425.59	[127.46, 723.73]	145.73
		形状控制参数 $ξ edge$	1.00	[0, 1]	0.51
	跳跃式增长	均值 $e iso$ /hm²	17.27	[15.59, 18.94]	17.52
		方差 $va r iso$ /hm²	52.88	[36.57, 69.19]	49.29
		形状控制参数 $ξ iso$	1.00	[0, 1]	0.62

表1

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 43

[1]	D'Amour C B, Reitsma F, Baiocchi G, et al. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(34):8939-8944. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606036114 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606036114
[2]	Brown D G, Verburg P H, Pontius R G Jr, et al. Opportunities to improve impact, integration, and evaluation of land change models[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(5):452-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.012
[3]	Batty M, Couclelis H, Eichen M. Urban systems as cellular automata[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1997, 24(2):159-164. DOI: 10.1068/b240159 doi: 10.1068/b240159
[4]	Tobler W R. Cellular geography[M]// Philosophy in Geography. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1979:379-386. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-9394-5
[5]	Liu Y, Batty M, Wang S, et al. Modelling urban change with cellular automata: Contemporary issues and future research directions[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2021, 45(1):3-24. DOI: 10.1177%2F0309132519895305 doi: 10.1177%2F0309132519895305
[6]	Yang J X, Gong J A, Tang W W, et al. Patch-based cellular automata model of urban growth simulation: Integrating feedback between quantitative composition and spatial configuration[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2020, 79:101402. DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101402 doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101402
[7]	Cao M, Huang M, Xu R, et al. A grey wolf optimizer-cellular automata integrated model for urban growth simulation and optimization[J]. Transactions in GIS, 2019, 23(4):672-687. DOI: 10.1111/tgis.12517 doi: 10.1111/tgis.12517
[8]	Aquilué N, De Cáceres M, Fortin M, et al. A spatial allocation procedure to model land-use/land-cover changes: Accounting for occurrence and spread processes[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 344(1):73-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.11.005
[9]	Liao J F, Tang L N, Shao G F, et al. A neighbor decay cellular automata approach for simulating urban expansion based on particle swarm intelligence[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2014, 28(4):720-738. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2013.869820 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2013.869820
[10]	Dahal K R, Chow T E. Characterization of neighborhood sensitivity of an irregular cellular automata model of urban growth[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2015, 29(3):475-497. DOI: 10.1080/13 658816.2014.987779 doi: 10.1080/13 658816.2014.987779
[11]	Yao Y, Liu X P, Li X, et al. Simulating urban land-use changes at a large scale by integrating dynamic land parcel subdivision and vector-based cellular automata[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2017, 31(12):2452-2479. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1360494 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1360494
[12]	Gounaridis D, Chorianopoulos I, Koukoulas S. Exploring prospective urban growth trends under different economic outlooks and land-use planning scenarios: The case of Athens[J]. Applied Geography, 2018, 90(1):134-144. DOI: 10.1080/13658810903270551 doi: 10.1080/13658810903270551
[13]	Liu X P, Li X, Shi X, et al. Simulating land-use dynamics under planning policies by integrating artificial immune systems with cellular automata[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(5):783-802. DOI: 10.1080/13658810903270551 doi: 10.1080/13658810903270551
[14]	Mustafa A, Saadi I, Cools M, et al. A Time Monte Carlo method for addressing uncertainty in land-use change models[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(11):2317-2333. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1503275 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1503275
[15]	Mustafa A, Cools M, Saadi I, et al. Coupling agent-based, cellular automata and logistic regression into a hybrid urban expansion model (HUEM)[J]. Land Use Policy, 2017, 69(12):529-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.009 doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.009
[16]	Verstegen J A, Karssenberg D, van der Hilst F, et al. Identifying a land use change cellular automaton by Bayesian data assimilation[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2014, 53:121-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.11.009
[17]	He J L, Li X, Yao Y, et al. Mining transition rules of cellular automata for simulating urban expansion by using the deep learning techniques[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2018, 32(10):2076-2097. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1480783 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2018.1480783
[18]	黎夏, 叶嘉安. 基于神经网络的元胞自动机及模拟复杂土地利用系统[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(1):19-27.
	[ Li X, Yeh A G. Cellular automata for simulating complex land use systems using neural networks[J]. Geographical Research, 2005, 24(1):19-27. ] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.01.003 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.01.003
[19]	杨建新, 龚健, 李江风. 基于LSSVM-CA模型的复杂土地利用变化模拟——以鄂州市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(8):1525-1537.
	[ Yang J X, Gong J A, Li J F. Complex land use changes simulation in Ezhou City using cellular automata based on least squares support vector machine[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(8):1525-1537. ] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.08.11 doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.08.11
[20]	Yang, Gong, Tang, et al. Delineation of urban growth boundaries using a patch-based cellular automata model under multiple spatial and socio-economic scenarios[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(21):6159. DOI: 10.3390/su11216159 doi: 10.3390/su11216159
[21]	李沁, 沈明, 高永年, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法和元胞自动机的城市扩张模拟——以南京为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(2):190-197.
	[ Li Q, Shen M, Gao Y N, et al. Urban expansion simulation using modified particle swarm optimization algorithm and cellular automata: A case study of Nanjing city[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(2):190-197. ] DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201702004 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201702004
[22]	Chen Y M, Li X, Liu X P, et al. Modeling urban land-use dynamics in a fast developing city using the modified logistic cellular automaton with a patch-based simulation strategy[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2014, 28(2):234-255. DOI: 10.1080/1365 8816.2013.831868 doi: 10.1080/1365 8816.2013.831868
[23]	Meentemeyer R K, Tang W W, Dorning M A, et al. Futrues: multilevel simulations of emerging urban-rural landscape structure using a stochastic patch-growing algorithm[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013, 103(4):785-807. DOI: 10.1080/00045608.20 12.707591 doi: 10.1080/00045608.20 12.707591
[24]	Richard S, Rebecca C K, Spencer A W, et al. InVEST user's guide[M]. Washington, D C: World Wildlife Fund, 2018. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32693.78567 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.32693.78567
[25]	包玉斌, 刘康, 李婷, 等. 基于InVEST模型的土地利用变化对生境的影响——以陕西省黄河湿地自然保护区为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(3):622-629.
	[ Bao Y B, Liu K, Li T, et al. Effects of land use change on habitat based on in VEST model—taking Yellow River wetland nature reserve in Shaanxi Province as an example[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(3):622-629. ] DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2015.05.29 doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2015.05.29
[26]	张影, 谢余初, 齐姗姗, 等. 基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生态系统碳储量及空间格局特征[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38(8):1585-1593.
	[ Zhang Y, Xie Y C, Qi S S, et al. Carbon storage and spatial distribution characteristics in the Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu based on In VEST model[J]. Resources Science, 2016, 38(8):1585-1593. ] DOI: 10.18402/resci.2016.08.16 doi: 10.18402/resci.2016.08.16
[27]	李婷, 刘康, 胡胜, 等. 基于InVEST模型的秦岭山地土壤流失及土壤保持生态效益评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(9):1242-1250.
	[ Li T, Liu K, Hu S, et al. Soil erosion and ecological benefits evaluation of Qinling mountains based on the invest model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2014, 23(9):1242-1250. ] DOI: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201409009 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201409009
[28]	包玉斌, 李婷, 柳辉, 等. 基于InVEST模型的陕北黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(4):664-676. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201604006
	[ Bao Y B, Li T, Liu H, et al. Spatial and temporal changes of water conservation of Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi Province by InVEST model[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(4):664-676. ] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201604006 doi: 10.11821/dlyj201604006
[29]	喻忠磊, 张文新, 梁进社, 等. 国土空间开发建设适宜性评价研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(9):1107-1122. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.004
	[ Yu Z L, Zhang W X, Liang J S, et al. Progress in evaluating suitability of spatial development and construction land[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(9):1107-1122. ] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.004 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.004
[30]	张大川, 刘小平, 姚尧, 等. 基于随机森林CA的东莞市多类土地利用变化模拟[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2016, 32(5):29-36,127.
	[ Zhang D C, Liu X P, Yao Y, et al. Simulating spatiotemporal change of multiple land use types in Dongguan by using random forest based on cellular automata[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2016, 32(5):29-36,127. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2016.05.005 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2016.05.005
[31]	Soares-Filho B S, Cerqueira G C, Pennachin C L. Dinamica—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2002, 154(3):217-235. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00059-5
[32]	Ke X L, Zheng W W, Zhou T, et al. A CA-based land system change model: LANDSCAPE[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2017, 31(9):1798-1817. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1315536 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2017.1315536
[33]	Wang Q J. Using genetic algorithms to optimise model parameters[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 1997, 12(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1016/S1364-8152(96)00030-8 doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(96)00030-8
[34]	Soares-Filho B, Rodrigues H, Follador M. A hybrid analytical-heuristic method for calibrating land-use change models[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2013, 43(5):80-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.010 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.010
[35]	刘小平, 黎夏, 陈逸敏, 等. 景观扩张指数及其在城市扩展分析中的应用[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(12):1430-1438. doi: 10.11821/xb200912003
	[ Liu X P, Li X, Chen Y M, et al. Landscape expansion index and its applications to quantitative analysis of urban expansion[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(12):1430-1438. ] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.12.003 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.12.003
[36]	McGarigal K, Marks B J. Fragstats—Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure[M]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1995.DOI: 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351 doi: 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351
[37]	Hagen A. Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2003, 17(3):235-249. DOI: 10.1080/13658810210157822 doi: 10.1080/13658810210157822
[38]	Rodrigues H, Soares-Filho B. A short presentation of dinamica EGO[M]//Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017:493-498. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W3-67-2015 doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W3-67-2015
[39]	蒋祺, 郑伯红. 城市用地扩展对长沙市水系变化的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(7):1429-1439.
	[ Jiang Q, Zheng B H. The relationship between the change of water system and the urban land expansion in Changsha[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2019, 34(7):1429-1439. ] DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190707 doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190707
[40]	Liu J Y, Teng X Y, Xiao J K. Application of shuttle imaging radar data for land use investigations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1986, 19(3):291-301. DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(86)90058-1 doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(86)90058-1
[41]	Yao Y, Li X, Liu X P, et al. Sensing spatial distribution of urban land use by integrating points-of-interest and Google Word2Vec model[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2017, 31(4):825-848. DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1244608 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2016.1244608
[42]	Silverman B W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis[M]. New York: Routledge, 2018:120-158. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488295 doi: 10.1080/00401706.1987.10488295
[43]	戴云哲. 湖南省土地生态服务功能演化特征及优化路径研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学, 2019.
	[ Dai Y Z. A study on evolution and optimization of land ecosystem services in Hunan Province[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2019. ] DOI: 10.27492/d.cnki.gzdzu.2019.000090 doi: 10.27492/d.cnki.gzdzu.2019.000090

AutoPaCA:耦合过程-模式的城镇空间增长模拟模型

AutoPaCA: Coupling Process and Spatial Pattern to Simulate Urban Growth

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 43

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王烁棋, 赵亮. 山城眺望空间OSCA模型构建及应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(9): 1559-1574.
[2]	杨练兵, 陈春波, 郑宏伟, 罗格平, 尚白军, Olaf Hellwich. 基于优化随机森林回归模型的土壤盐渍化反演[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(9): 1662-1674.
[3]	邢晓语, 杨秀春, 徐斌, 金云翔, 郭剑, 陈昂, 杨东, 王平, 朱立博. 基于随机森林算法的草原地上生物量遥感估算方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(7): 1312-1324.
[4]	李慧香, 潘云, 宫辉力, 孙颖. 机器学习方法在预测泉水潜在出露位置中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(6): 1028-1039.
[5]	方秀琴, 郭晓萌, 袁玲, 杨露露, 任立良, 朱求安. 随机森林算法在全球干旱评估中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(6): 1040-1049.
[6]	张菊, 房世波, 刘汉湖. 基于微波数据与光学数据集成的机器学习技术在作物产量估算中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(6): 1082-1091.
[7]	张毅, 朱攀. 电动出租车专用充电场站选址模型研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(5): 802-811.
[8]	杨帅, 杨娜, 陈传法, 常兵涛, 高原, 郑婷婷. 顾及数据配准的江西省SRTM DEM精度评价和修正[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(5): 869-881.
[9]	文超, 詹庆明, 樊智宇, 湛德, 赵皇, 吴凯. 1979—2019年武汉市重点水体多要素协同的时空演变特征[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(11): 2055-2072.
[10]	张世伟, 魏璐瑶, 金星星, 陆玉麒. 基于FLUS-UGB的县域土地利用模拟及城镇开发边界划定研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1848-1859.
[11]	赵鹏军, 曹毓书. 基于多源地理大数据与机器学习的地铁乘客出行目的识别方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1753-1765.
[12]	蒲东川, 王桂周, 张兆明, 牛雪峰, 何国金, 龙腾飞, 尹然宇, 江威, 孙嘉悦. 基于独立成分分析和随机森林算法的城镇用地提取研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1597-1606.
[13]	朱守杰, 杜世宏, 李军, 商硕硕, 杜守基. 融合多源空间数据的城镇人口分布估算[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1607-1616.
[14]	李婉, 牛陆, 陈虹, 吴骅. 基于随机森林算法的地表温度鲁棒降尺度方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1666-1678.
[15]	毛亚萍, 房世峰. 基于机器学习的参考作物蒸散量估算研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1692-1701.