基于DEM的5节点二阶差分坡度算法模型与实验分析

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00286

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 286-291.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00286

• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 上一篇下一篇

基于DEM的5节点二阶差分坡度算法模型与实验分析

赵明伟¹, 汤国安¹, 张磊¹, 田剑^1,2, 宋效东¹

1. 南京师范大学虚拟地理环境教育部重点实验室,南京 210046;
2. 合肥工业大学资源与环境工程学院,合肥 230009

收稿日期:2011-09-02 修回日期:2012-04-05 出版日期:2012-06-25 发布日期:2012-06-25
通讯作者: 汤国安(1961-),男,汉族,宁波市人,博士生导师,教授,主要研究方向为地理信息系统、DEM与数字地形分析,GIS空间分析等。E-mail:tangguoan@njnu.edu.cn E-mail:tangguoan@njnu.edu.cn
作者简介:赵明伟(1986-),男,汉族,莱芜市人,硕士研究生,主要从事空间分析与数字地形分析的研究工作。 E-mail:zhaomingwei68@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目"基于DEM的黄土高原地貌形态空间格局研究"(40930531);资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室开放基金项目(2010KF0002SA);江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目。

The DEM Based 5-Node Second-order Finite Difference Model for Slope Computation

ZHAO Mingwei¹, TANG Guoan¹, ZHANG Lei¹, TIAN Jian^1,2, SONG Xiaodong¹

1. Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographical Environment, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China;
2. School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2011-09-02 Revised:2012-04-05 Online:2012-06-25 Published:2012-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

坡度作为最基本的地形因子,是构建地学分析模型的基础数据,基于格网DEM的坡度计算模型的精度分析一直是地学分析的重要研究内容。本文通过分析计算坡度的差分模型误差来源及特征,提出了一种新的模型——5节点二阶差分模型。其基本思想是顾及多距离邻近点高程信息,采用5×5分析窗口,建立单倍格网和两倍格网的差分计算线性组合模型。并通过数学分析的理论推导证明该模型可以显著提高计算精度。实验选取典型数学曲面并对其采用不同的分辨率(1m和5m)进行离散化精度验证。计算结果表明,与现有的差分模型相比,5节点二阶差分模型可以显著提高坡度的精度,对应于两种分辨率的DEM,该模型计算坡度的精度可以分别提高7×10⁴倍、3×10³倍以上,表明该模型对于高分辨率DEM数据更为适用。本研究不仅丰富了数字地形分析的方法体系,为相关地学模型分析提供更精确的坡度数据,而且为将来改进地形曲率因子等计算模型提供了一定的参考和借鉴。

关键词: 坡度, DEM, 差分模型, 精度

Abstract:

Slope is the most basic terrain parameter to construct geo-science models. The accuracy analysis of the computing model is one of the most important issues in the geo-science. A lot of studies focused on error analysis of the computing model over the past few decades. The source of the error and the relationship between the error and the other parameters were studied. However, few studies were aimed to put forward a new model to decrease the error, which is more important for high resolution DEMs. By analyzing the error source of the slope computing model, this paper put forward a new model called 5 Node Second-order Finite Difference (5N-2FD). The characteristic of this model is that it is able to consider the multi-distance neighbor node: firstly it builds two difference models using different grid sizes, and then combines the two models into one with different weights. It is proved that it can improve the accuracy of the results remarkably through mathematical analysis. In this paper, a mathematical surface is selected to verify the accuracy of the new model. In order to study the influence of the resolution to the accuracy of the slope, this paper generated DEMs from the mathematical surface with different resolution, one is 1m, and the other is 5m. The results show that the new model can significantly improve the accuracy of the result compared with the common models. This study enriched the method system of digital terrain analysis, and provided slope data of high accuracy for many geo-science models. In addition, besides slope, there are many terrain parameters which are calculated through finite difference, such as aspect and various kinds of curvature, and the methods of this paper could afford some useful references in improving the accuracy of such terrain parameters.

Key words: slope, difference model, DEM, accuracy

赵明伟, 汤国安, 张磊, 田剑, 宋效东. 基于DEM的5节点二阶差分坡度算法模型与实验分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2012, 14(3): 286-291.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00286

ZHAO Mingwei, TANG Guoan, ZHANG Lei, TIAN Jian, SONG Xiaodong. The DEM Based 5-Node Second-order Finite Difference Model for Slope Computation[J]. , 2012, 14(3): 286-291.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00286

参考文献

[1] 刘学军. 基于规则格网数字高程模型解译算法误差分析与评价 . 武汉大学,2002.

[2] Jones K H. A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM[J]. Computer and Geosciences, 1998, 24(4):315-323.

[3] OCallaghan J F, Mark D M. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data [J]. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 1984(28):323-344.

[4] Sharpnack D A, Akin G. An algorithm for computing slope and aspect from elevations[J]. Photogrammetric Survey, 1969(35): 247-248.

[5] Horn B K P. Hill shading and the reflectance map[J]. Proceedings of IEEE, 1981, 69(1): 14-47.

[6] 刘学军,卞璐,卢华星,等. 顾及DEM误差自相关的坡度计算模型精度分析[J]. 测绘学报,2008,37(2):200-206.

[7] Zhou Q M, Liu X J. Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties[J]. Computer & Geosciences, 2004(30):369-378.

[8] 汤国安,赵牡丹,李天文,等. DEM提取黄土高原地面坡度的不确定性[J]. 地理学报,2003,58(6):824-830.

[9] 刘学军,龚健雅,周启鸣,等. DEM结构特征对坡度坡向的影响分析[J]. 地理与地理信息科学,2004,20(6):1-5.

[10] 贾敦新,汤国安,王春,等. DEM数据误差与地形描述误差对坡度精度的影响[J]. 地球信息科学,2009,11(1):43-49.

[11] Hodgson M E. What cell size does the computed slope/aspect angle represent?[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1995(61): 513-517.

[12] Jones K H. A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM[J]. Computer and Geosciences, 1998, 24(4): 315-323.

[13] Carter J R. The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect using gridded DEMs[J]. Cartographica, 1992, 29(1): 22-34.

[14] 贾旖旎,汤国安,刘学军. 高程内插方法对DEM所提取坡度、坡向精度的影响[J]. 地球信息科学,2009,11(1):36-42.

[15] 刘学军,龚健雅,周启鸣,等. 基于DEM坡度坡向算法精度的分析研究[J]. 测绘学报,2004,33(3):258-263.

[16] Florinsky I V. Computation of the third-order partial derivatives from a digital elevation model[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2009, 23(2): 213-231.

基于DEM的5节点二阶差分坡度算法模型与实验分析

The DEM Based 5-Node Second-order Finite Difference Model for Slope Computation

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	帅艳民, 马现伟, 曲歌, 邵聪颖, 刘涛, 刘守民, 黄华兵, 谷玲霄, 拉提帕·吐尔汗江, 梁继, 李玲. 协同多时相波谱特征的不透水面信息级联提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(1): 171-186.
[2]	柳林, 吴雨菡, 宋广文, 肖露子. 犯罪防控警务策略及其时空效益评估研究进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(1): 29-42.
[3]	朱守杰, 杜世宏, 李军, 商硕硕, 杜守基. 融合多源空间数据的城镇人口分布估算[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(8): 1607-1616.
[4]	罗竹, 刘凯, 张春亢, 邓心远, 马荣华, 宋春桥. DEM在湖泊水文变化研究中的应用进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(7): 1510-1521.
[5]	余卓渊, 闾国年, 张夕宁, 贾远信, 周成虎, 葛咏, 吕可晶. 全息高精度导航地图: 概念及理论模型[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 760-771.
[6]	李思进, 代文, 熊礼阳, 汤国安. DEM分辨率对黄土侵蚀沟形态特征表达的不确定性分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 338-350.
[7]	秦臣臣, 陈传法, 杨娜, 高原, 王梦樱. 基于ICESat/GLAS的山东省SRTM与ASTER GDEM高程精度评价与修正[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 351-360.
[8]	王春, 徐燕, 江岭, 赵明伟. 规则格网DEM局地坡面凸凹性精度分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 361-369.
[9]	赵尚民, 程维明, 蒋经天, 沙文娟. 资源三号卫星DEM数据与全球开放DEM数据的误差对比[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 370-378.
[10]	张鑫港, 闫浩文, 张黎明. 一种用于DEM数据认证与篡改定位的感知哈希算法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 379-388.
[11]	赵明伟, 金永林, 江岭, 王春, 杨灿灿, 徐燕. 多模型协同下的城郊地区DEM构建方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 389-398.
[12]	黄楠, 杨昕, 刘海龙. 基于等高线空间关系的鞍部点提取方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 410-421.
[13]	胡金龙, 唐梦鸽, 罗明良, 魏兰, 晏自红, 秦子晗. 基于DEM的一体化山地特征要素提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 422-430.
[14]	雷雪, 周毅, 李阳, 王泽涛. 基于DEM的黄土地貌逼近度因子构建及特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 431-441.
[15]	曹泽涛, 方子东, 姚瑾, 熊礼阳. 基于随机森林的黄土地貌分类研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 452-463.