一种面向对象的像元级遥感图像分类方法

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00744

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 744-751.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00744

一种面向对象的像元级遥感图像分类方法

李小江^1,2, 孟庆岩¹, 王春梅¹, 刘苗¹, 郑利娟¹, 王珂¹

1. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所遥感科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2013-03-07 修回日期:2013-05-13 出版日期:2013-09-29 发布日期:2013-09-29
通讯作者: 孟庆岩(1971-),男,博士,研究员,主要从事遥感应用研究。E-mail:mqy@irsa.ac.cn E-mail:mqy@irsa.ac.cn
作者简介:李小江(1988-),男,硕士生,主要从事环境遥感研究。E-mail:lixiaojiang.good@163.com
基金资助:
欧盟第七框架项目(FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IRSES-IGIT);广东省省院产学研合作资金项目(2012B091100219)、中国科学院对外重点合作项目(GJHZ1003)。

A Hybrid Model of Object-Oriented and Pixel Based Classification of Remotely Sensed Data

LI Xiaojiang^1,2, MENG Qingyan¹, WANG Chunmei¹, LIU Miao¹, ZHENG Lijuan¹, WANG Ke¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2013-03-07 Revised:2013-05-13 Online:2013-09-29 Published:2013-09-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文提出一种面向对象的像元级分类方法(混合模型),并将其与单纯的以像元和面向对象的两种方法同时应用于分辨率分别为30m和0.5m的环境星CCD数据和航空影像进行对比分析。分类结果中不同地物类别之间光谱可分性的大小,很大程度上可反映分类结果的可靠性。若地物类型之间的光谱差异大,说明分类方法能将光谱差异大的地物很好地划分,显示出较可靠的分类结果;相反,如果分类结果中地物类型光谱差异小,则反映分类方法不够可靠。鉴此,本文通过计算分类结果中不同类别所对应的原始遥感影像像元之间的J-M(Jeffries-Matusita Distance)距离来度量分类结果中地物之间的光谱可分性,并用J-M距离比较分析了3种图像分类方法对2种不同分辨率影像的分类结果中各个类别之间的光谱可分性的变化。分析结果表明,混合模型不但能够得到较连续的分类结果,同时能够保持分类结果中类别之间的可分性。本文对分类结果进行了精度验证,结果发现混合模型的分类精度较其他2种方法要高。2种不同分辨率的遥感影像分析结果得到相同的结论,表明该模型适用于中分辨率和高分辨率影像。

关键词: 多种分辨率, 面向对象, 混合模型, J-M(Jeffries-Matusita)距离, 地物光谱可分性

Abstract:

Three classification methods: maximum likelihood at pixel level, maximum likelihood at object level and a hybrid model of pixel based and object-based classification method were used to classify these two sorts of images, i.e., 30m resolution HJ-1-A CCD imagery and 0.5 m resolution aerial images. Spectral separability in training samples between different classes directly affect the classification accuracy; on the contrary, spectral separability between different classes in the classification result can be used to evaluate the accuracy of classification. Based on this assumption, classification results of these three methods were evaluated by spectral separability between different classes. Result reveals that compared with the maximum likelihood at object level, classification at pixel level can make full use of the spectral information in remotely sensed image. Analysis also shows that hybrid model can improve the classification accuracy. Multi-resolution image analysis proves that the hybrid model is suitable for applications at different scales.

Key words: object-oriented, hybrid model, J-M(Jeffries-Matusita) Distance, multi-resolution, spectral separability

李小江, 孟庆岩, 王春梅, 刘苗, 郑利娟, 王珂. 一种面向对象的像元级遥感图像分类方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2013, 15(5): 744-751.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00744

LI Xiao-Jiang, MENG Qiang-Yan, WANG Chun-Mei, LIU Miao, ZHENG Li-Juan, WANG Ke. A Hybrid Model of Object-Oriented and Pixel Based Classification of Remotely Sensed Data[J]. , 2013, 15(5): 744-751.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00744

参考文献

[1] Ediriwickrema J, Khorram S. Hierarchical maximum-likelihood classification for improved accuracies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997 (35):810-816.

[2] Jensen R J, Lulla D K. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective[C]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2005.

[3] Bishop C M. Neural networks for pattern recognition[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.

[4] Benediktsson J A, Swain P H, Ersoy O K. Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote-sensing data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1990(28):550-552.

[5] Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.

[6] Huang C, Davis L S, Townshend J R G. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2002(23):725-749.

[7] Zhu G, Blumberg, D G. Classification using ASTER data and SVM algorithms: The case study of Beer Sheva, Israel [J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002(80):233-240.

[8] Pal M, Mather P M. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2005(26):1007-1011.

[9] Mountrakis G, Im J, Ogole C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011(66):247-259.

[10] Walter V. Object-based classification of remote sensing data for change detection[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2004(58):225-238.

[11] Wang, L., Sousa, W.P., et al. Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004(25): 5655-5668.

[12] Malinverni E S, Tassetti A N, Mancini A,et al. Hybrid object- based approach for land use/land cover mapping using high spatial resolution imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2011(25):1025-1043.

[13] Myint S W, Gober P, Brazel A, et al. Per-pixel vs object- based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011,115(5):1145-1161.

[14] Lin H. Method of image segmentation on high-resolution image and classification for land covers fourth[C]. International Conference on Natural Computation, 2008, 563-566.

[15] Vincent L, Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations[J]. N IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1991(13):583:597.

[16] Xiao P. Feng X, Li H. Multispectral remotely sensed imagery segmentation based on first fundamental form[C]. IEEE Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event, 2009.

[17] Hill P R, Canagarajah C N, Bull D R. Image segmentation using a texture gradient based watershed transform [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2003 (12): 1618-1633.

[18] Brandt T, Paul M M. Classification methods for remotely sensed data (2nd Ed.) [M]. New York: CRC Press, 2007, 58-62.

[19] Michelson D B, Liljeberg B M, Pilesjo P. Comparison of algorithms for classifying Swedish landcover using LANDSAT TM and ERS-1 SAR data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000(71):1-15.

一种面向对象的像元级遥感图像分类方法

A Hybrid Model of Object-Oriented and Pixel Based Classification of Remotely Sensed Data

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈昂, 杨秀春, 徐斌, 金云翔, 张文博, 郭剑, 邢晓语, 杨东. 基于面向对象与深度学习的榆树疏林识别方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(9): 1897-1909.
[2]	杜培军, 王欣, 蒙亚平, 林聪, 张鹏, 卢刚. 面向地理国情监测的变化检测与地表覆盖信息更新方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 857-866.
[3]	张志慧, 刘雯, 李笑含, 朱靖轩, 张洪涛, 杨东, 徐超昊, 徐宪立. 基于无人机航摄影像的喀斯特地区裸岩信息提取及景观格局分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2436-2444.
[4]	王丽英, 赵元丁. 一种灰度体素结构分割模型下的机载LiDAR 3D滤波算法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(11): 2118-2127.
[5]	张明祥, 王泽根, 白茹月, 贾鸿顺. 一种由粗到精的光学与SAR遥感图像配准算法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(11): 2238-2246.
[6]	叶杰, 孟凡晓, 白潍铭, 张斌, 郑金明. “四同”条件下周口城区高分一号遥感影像分类对比研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(10): 2088-2097.
[7]	张俊瑶,姚永慧,索南东主,郜丽静,王晶,张兴航. 基于垂直带谱的太白山区山地植被遥感信息提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(8): 1284-1294.
[8]	耿仁方,付波霖,蔡江涛,陈晓雨,蓝斐芜,余杭洺,李青逊. 基于无人机影像和面向对象随机森林算法的岩溶湿地植被识别方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(8): 1295-1306.
[9]	王林江, 吴炳方, 张淼, 邢强. 关键生育期冬小麦和油菜遥感分类方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(7): 1121-1131.
[10]	吴方明, 张淼, 吴炳方. 无人机影像的面向对象水稻种植面积快速提取[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 789-798.
[11]	李中元, 吴炳方, 张淼, 邢强, 李名勇, 闫娜娜. 利用物候差异与面向对象决策树提取油菜种植面积[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 720-730.
[12]	杜保佳, 张晶, 王宗明, 毛德华, 张淼, 吴炳方. 应用Sentinel-2A NDVI时间序列和面向对象决策树方法的农作物分类[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(5): 740-751.
[13]	李杨, 王杰, 黄春林. 一种基于归一化扰动模型的积雪和植被覆盖度反演方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(12): 1955-1964.
[14]	肖池伟,饶滴滴,刘怡媛,封志明,李鹏. 地缘经济合作背景下的中国磨憨-老挝磨丁口岸地区建设用地扩张[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(10): 1576-1585.
[15]	王卷乐, 程凯, 祝俊祥, 刘清. 蒙古国30米分辨率土地覆盖产品研制与空间格局分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(9): 1263-1273.