CG-LTDR地表覆盖数据对BCC_AVIM 1.0陆面温度模拟的影响研究

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.01294

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文将CG-LTDR数据集中的地表覆盖数据产品应用于北京气候中心陆面模式（BCC_AVIM 1.0）中,并通过数值模拟分析不同覆盖类型的数据（冰川、湿地、湖泊、植被PFT）更新对模拟结果的影响。结果表明,新数据对不同地表类型的基本分布特征都有合理描述,但与模式中原有数据的差异明显,表现为冰川比例在格陵兰岛西部地区增加,湿地在大部分地区都减少,湖泊在北美和欧亚大陆中高纬地区的比例减少,但青藏高原及周边地区小幅增加,植被PFT的差异最明显。与采用模式原地表覆盖数据的控制试验相比,新数据引入所致的改变,主要局限于地表覆盖数据改变的区域。冰川数据更新使高纬冰川积雪区和青藏高原的温度降低,湿地数据提高了欧洲和北美主要水区的地面温度,湖泊数据有效降低了亚洲地区的温度,更新植被PFT的影响最广泛,使得南美、南非、东北亚、北美和澳洲大部分地区的温度升高,而中国华南江南地区以及南亚地区的温度降低,但在一些地区的模拟效果降低。数据全部更新引起的温度改变最明显,但并不是所有类型的简单叠加,尤其在地表复杂区域。不同的覆盖类型数据更新,可在一定程度上减少模式对于地表温度的模拟偏差（如格陵兰岛西部和青藏高原地区、欧洲内陆湖区的温度偏高）,因此需适当选用更新的数据。

关键词: 地表覆盖, BCC_AVIM, 冰川, 湿地, 湖泊, PFT, 地面温度

Abstract:

The land cover (LC) datasets of CG-LTDR was applied in the Beijing Climate Center Land Model (BCC_AVIM 1.0). The impacts of different LC type updates on the ground temperature (Tg) were investigated through several numerical simulations. The results show that the CG-LTDR can reasonably describe the LC features. Compared with the original LC rawdata, the glacier fraction of the new CG-LTDR datasets were extensively increased in the high-latitude regions of the Greenland Island and Europe, as well as the Tibetan Plateau; the fraction of wetland was decreased in the major water body areas of North America and Europe; and the percentage of lake was also majorly decreased in the North American inland water area, but slightly increased around the Tibetan Plateau. The PFT present the largest differences between the new and original datasets. Besides the control runs with the original LC dataset (CTL), five simulations were conducted to compare different impacts of LC types (the glacier, wetland, lake, PFT and all types) on Tg. The changes of Tg due to LC dataset updates majorly constrained in the areas where the LC types (fraction) were modified. With the individual updates of glacier (rGlacier), the simulated Tg was lowered in the high-latitude areas. The simulated Tg with new wetland (rWetland) was increased, while the simulated Tg with the new lake (rLake) datasets were effectively decreased in the Tibetan Plateau. These changes were helpful to improve the model performances on Tg simulations. The most significant and extensive changes among the 4 LC types occurred when updating the PFT (rPFT), which were helpful for reducing the errors in the south and east Asian areas, but enlarged the biases in the other regions. The LC dataset updates of all types (rALL) show the most significant impacts on the Tg simulations, which was not simply the linear sum of the individual updates of LC types, especially in the areas having complex types. Therefore, proper introductions of new CG-LTDR land cover datasets were useful to improve the model performance in Tg simulations.

Key words: land cover, BCC_AVIM 1.0, glacier, wetland, lake, PFT, ground temperature

史学丽, 张芳, 周文艳, 张艳武. CG-LTDR地表覆盖数据对BCC_AVIM 1.0陆面温度模拟的影响研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2015, 17(11): 1294-1303.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.01294

SHI Xueli,ZHANG Fang,ZHOU Wenyan,ZHANG Yanwu. Impacts of CG-LTDR Land Cover Dataset Updates on the Ground Temperature Simulation with BCC_AVIM 1.0[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2015, 17(11): 1294-1303.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2015.01294

图/表 8

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 20

[1]	秦大河,T. Stocker,259名作者和TSU(驻伯尔尼和北京).IPCC第五次评估报告第一工作组报告的两点结论[J].气候变化研究进展,2014,10(1):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1719.2014.01.001
[2]	孙菽芬. 陆面过程的物理、生化机理和参数化模型[M].北京:气象出版社,2005.
[3]	Pitman P J.Review:The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models[J]. International Journalof Climatology, 2003,23:479-510. doi: 10.1002/joc.893
[4]	Lawrence P J, Chase T N.Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0)[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007,112(G1), G01023,doi:10.1029/2006JG000168. doi: 10.1029/2006JG000168
[5]	Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, et al.Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: First mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2013,34(7):2607-2654.
[6]	Chen J, Chen J, Cao X, et al. Global land cover mapping at 30m resolution: A POK-based operational approach[J].ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2015(103):7-27. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002
[7]	Oleson K W, Dai Y J, Bonan G, et al.Technical description of the Community Land Model (CLM)[M]. Boulder: NCAR/TN-461+STR, 2004.
[8]	Ji J J.A climate-vegetation interaction model-simulating the physical and biological process at the surface[J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1995,22(2-3):445-451. doi: 10.2307/2845941
[9]	Ji JJ, Huang M, Li K.Prediction of carbon exchange between China terrestrial ecosystem and atmosphere in 21st century[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2008,51(6):885-898. doi: 10.1007/s11430-008-0039-y
[10]	李伟平,刘新,聂肃平,等.气候模式中积雪覆盖率参数化方案的对比研究[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(5):512-522.
[11]	吴统文,宋连春,李伟平,等.北京气候中心气候系统模式研发进展——在气候变化研究中的应用[J].气象学报,2014,71(1):12-29. doi: 10.11676/qxxb2013.084
[12]	Loveland T R, Reed B C, Brown J F, et al.Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1km AVHRR data[J]. International Journalof Remote Sensing, 2000,21(6-7):1303-1330. doi: 10.1080/014311600210191
[13]	Cogley J G.GGHYDRO —— Global Hydrographic Data Release 2.0[R]. Trent Climate Note 91-1, Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, 1991.
[14]	Bonan G B, S Levis, L Kergoat, et al. Landscapes as patches of plant functional types: An integrating concept for climate and ecosystem models[J]. Global Biogeochemistry Cycles, 2002,16(2):5.1-5.23. doi: 10.1029/2000GB001360
[15]	Yu L, Wang J, Li X C, et al.A multi-resolution global land cover dataset through multisource data aggregation[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014,57(10):2317-2329. doi: 10.1007/s11430-014-4919-z
[16]	Lawrence D M, Oleson K W, Flanner M G, et al.Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2011,3(1):M03001, doi:10.1029/2011MS000045. doi: 10.1029/2011MS00045
[17]	Lobell D B, Bala G, Duffy P B.Biogeophysical impacts of cropland management changes on climate[J]. Geophysical Research Letter, 2006,33(6):L06708,doi:10.1029/2005GL025492. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025492
[18]	Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood E F.Development of a 50-yr high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling[J]. Journal of Climate, 2006,19(13):3088-3111. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3790.1
[19]	Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J, et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(656):553-597. doi: 10.1002/qj.828
[20]	陈海山,熊明明,沙文钰.CLM3.0对中国区域陆面过程的模拟试验及评估I:土壤温度[J].气象科学,2010,30(5):621-630. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0827.2010.05.008

试验名称	试验方案设计
CTL	用模式原始数据生成T106格点上的地表覆盖数据
rGlacier	同CTL,但更新冰川类型覆盖比例数据
rWetland	同CTL,但更新湿地覆盖比例数据
rLake	同CTL,但更新湖泊覆盖比例数据
rPFT	同CTL,但更新植被不同PFT覆盖比例数据
rALL	同CTL,但更新全部覆盖类型数据