遥感数据的高斯金字塔尺度上推方法研究

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00682

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 682-691.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00682

遥感数据的高斯金字塔尺度上推方法研究

李乐^1,²(), 宋维静³, 陈腊娇^1,^*(), 王力哲¹, 高丹⁴

1. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所,北京 100094
2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
3. 中国地质大学（武汉）计算机学院,武汉 430074
4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101

收稿日期:2016-12-16 修回日期:2017-02-22 出版日期:2017-05-20 发布日期:2017-05-20
通讯作者: 陈腊娇 E-mail:lile@radi.ac.cn;chenlj@radi.ac.cn
作者简介:
作者简介：李乐（1991-）,女,山东泰安人,硕士生,主要从事多元时空序列数据的处理研究。E-mail:lile@radi.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所所长基金项目“基于动态追踪树的区域计算型GIS空间分析并行化研究

Research on Scaling up of Remotely Sensed Data with Gaussian Pyramid Method

LI Le^1,²(), SONG Weijing³, CHEN Lajiao^1,^*(), WANG Lizhe¹, GAO Dan⁴

1. Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, CAS, Beijing 100094, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3. School of Computer Science, China University of Geosciences （Wuhan）, Wuhan 430074, China
4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2016-12-16 Revised:2017-02-22 Online:2017-05-20 Published:2017-05-20
Contact: CHEN Lajiao E-mail:lile@radi.ac.cn;chenlj@radi.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

尺度转换是遥感信息科学领域的研究热点,其传统研究方法大多局限于统计模型,对数据的空间结构信息考虑较少,很难满足遥感数据的多尺度表达要求。基于此,针对遥感数据的尺度不一致问题,本文提出了一种利用高斯金字塔的图像模糊特性进行遥感数据尺度上推的方法,在对金字塔每一层的数据高斯模糊的基础上,通过多次连续的降采样,得到一系列不同尺度的数据,从而满足实际应用的空间分辨率要求。为了验证本文所提方法的有效性,本文选择Landsat7 ETM影像和ASTER GDEM为研究数据进行尺度上推,并与传统的最邻近、双线性以及立方卷积等方法进行了实验对比,采用均值、方差、均方根误差、平均绝对误差等评价指标,以及相同分辨率的ASTER GDEM和SRTM DEM的等高线套合结果来衡量高斯金字塔方法的性能。实验结果表明,本文使用的高斯金字塔尺度上推方法能够有效地实现连续遥感数据的尺度转换,在保持遥感数据局部细节特征的基础上,较好地保持了原始遥感数据的信息量以及空间结构特征。

关键词: 尺度上推, 遥感数据, 高斯金字塔, 高斯模糊, 降采样

Abstract:

Scale transformation has been a research hotspot in the field of remote sensing information science, and its processing methods are now limited to the traditional statistical methods. They consider less spatial structural information of data and can't satisfy the requirements of multi-scale expression. In view of scale inconsistency problems of remotely sensed data, this paper proposed a scaling up method based on image blurring characteristic of Gaussian pyramid. Firstly, this method made Gaussian blur using different filtering parameters for remotely sensed data, and it created several Gaussian blurring data in each layer of the pyramid model. Then Gaussian blurring data were processed by down-sampling constantly, and we obtained a series of different resolution of remotely sensed data. Accordingly, the multi-scale remotely sensed data could meet the spatial resolution requirements of practical application. In order to prove the effectiveness of the proposed method, this paper chose Landsat 7 ETM images and ASTER GDEM data to achieve scaling up. Also, we put forward quantitative evaluation indices including mean, variance, mean absolute error, root mean square error and conducted experiments to compare with the general methods of scaling up, such as nearest neighbor method, bilinear method and cubic convolution method. Besides, the performance of Gaussian pyramid method was measured through the results of contour sets between ASTER GDEM and SRTM DEM with the same resolution. Experimental results showed that Gaussian pyramid method in this paper can effectively realize the scaling up for continuous remotely sensed data, and the results are superior to other traditional methods. Gaussian pyramid method can also keep local characteristics of the details and maintain amount of information, spatial structural features of remotely sensed data. In summary, the using of Gaussian pyramid method in the field of remote sensing is a new attempt, and can provide necessary data preparation for multi-scale visual expression.

Key words: scale up, remotely sensed data, Gaussian pyramid, Gaussian blur, down-sampling

李乐, 宋维静, 陈腊娇, 王力哲, 高丹. 遥感数据的高斯金字塔尺度上推方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(5): 682-691.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00682

LI Le,SONG Weijing,CHEN Lajiao,WANG Lizhe,GAO Dan. Research on Scaling up of Remotely Sensed Data with Gaussian Pyramid Method[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017, 19(5): 682-691.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00682

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 19

[1]	李双成,蔡运龙.地理尺度转换若干问题的初步探讨[J].地理研究,2005,24(1):11-18. doi: 10.11821/yj2005010002
	[Li S C, Cai Y L.Some scaling issues of geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2005,24(1):11-18. ] doi: 10.11821/yj2005010002
[2]	Wu J G, Jelinski D E, Luck M, et al.Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics[J]. Geographic Information Sciences, 2000,6(1):6-19. doi: 10.1080/10824000009480529
[3]	Stoter J, Visser T, van Oosterom P, et al. A semantic-rich multi-scale information model for topography[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2011,25(5):739-763. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2010.490218
[4]	Abdulle A, Weinan E, Engquist B, et al.The heterogeneous multiscale method[J]. Acta Numerica, 2012,21:1-87.
[5]	张华国,黄韦艮.基于分形的海岸线遥感信息空间尺度研究[J].遥感学报,2006,10(4):463-468. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4619.2006.04.005
	[Zhang H G, Huang W G.Study on spatial scale of shoreline remote sensing information based on fractal theory[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006,10(4):463-468. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4619.2006.04.005
[6]	Verburg P H, Neumann K, Nol L.Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011,17(2):974-989. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02307.x
[7]	王璐,胡月明,赵英时,等.克里格法的土壤水分遥感尺度转换[J].地球信息科学学报,2012,14(4):465-473. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00465
	[Wang L, Hu Y M, Zhao Y S, et al.Remote sensing scale transformation of soil moisture based on block kriging[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2012,14(4):465-473. ] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00465
[8]	胡云峰,徐芝英,刘越,等.地理空间数据的尺度转换[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(3):297-304.
	[Hu Y F, Xu Z Y, Liu Y, et al.A review of the scaling issues of geospatial data[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2013,28(3):297-304. ]
[9]	孟斌,王劲峰.地理数据尺度转换方法研究进展[J].地理学报,2005,60(2):277-288. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.02.011
	[Meng B, Wang J F.A review on the methodology of scaling with geo-data[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005,60(2):277-288. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2005.02.011
[10]	Tao X, Yan B Y, Wang K, et al.Scale transformation of Leaf Area Index product retrieved from multiresolution remotely sensed data: analysis and case studies[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009,30(20):5383-5395. doi: 10.1080/01431160903130978
[11]	Le Coz M, Delclaux F, Genthon P, et al.Assessment of digital elevation model (DEM) aggregation methods for hydrological modeling: Lake Chad basin, Africa[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2009,35(8):1661-1670. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.07.009
[12]	杨勤科,David Jupp,郭伟玲,等.基于滤波方法的DEM尺度变换方法研究[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(6):58-62.
	[Yang Q K, Jupp D, Guo W L, et al.Genaralizing the fine resolution DEMs with filtering method[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008,28(6):58-62. ]
[13]	刘学军,王彦芳,晋蓓.利用点扩散函数进行DEM尺度转换[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版,2009,34(12):1458-1462.
	[Liu X J, Wang Y F, Jin B.A upscaling method of digital elevation method with point spread function[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2009,34(12):1458-1462. ]
[14]	Dendoncker N, Schmit C, Rounsevell M.Exploring spatial data uncertainties in land-use change scenarios[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2008,22(9):1013-1030.
[15]	廖一兰. 社会经济数据尺度转换研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2006.
	[Liao Y L.The study for scaling with socioeconomic data[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2006. ]
[16]	吴凡,祝国瑞.基于小波分析的地貌多尺度表达与自动综合[J].武汉大学学报·信息科学版,2001,26(2):170-176. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8860.2001.02.015
	[Wu F, Zhu G R.Multi-scale representation and automatic generalization of relief based on wavelet analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2001,26(2):170-176. ] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-8860.2001.02.015
[17]	Lindeberg T.Scale-space theory: A basic tool for analysing structures at different scales[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 1994,21(2):225-270. doi: 10.1080/757582976
[18]	Burt P, Adelson E.The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code[J]. IEEE Transactions on communications, 1983,31(4):532-540. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-051581-6.50065-9
[19]	Galiano G, Velasco J.On a nonlocal spectrogram for denoising one-dimensional signals[J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2014,244:859-869. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.003

遥感数据的高斯金字塔尺度上推方法研究

Research on Scaling up of Remotely Sensed Data with Gaussian Pyramid Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	周佳, 赵亚鹏, 岳天祥, 卢涛. 结合HASM和GWR方法的省级尺度近地表气温估算[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(10): 2098-2107.
[2]	王法溧,何晓宇,方泽兴,魏显虎,叶虎平,施令飞. 基于长时间序列遥感数据的阿伯德尔国家公园生态环境质量评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(9): 1479-1479.
[3]	王林江, 吴炳方, 张淼, 邢强. 关键生育期冬小麦和油菜遥感分类方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(7): 1121-1131.
[4]	谭深, 吴炳方, 张鑫. 基于Google Earth Engine与多源遥感数据的海南水稻分类研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(6): 937-947.
[5]	周岩, 董金玮. 陆表水体遥感监测研究进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(11): 1768-1778.
[6]	洪娅岚,薛存金,刘敬一,刘星,孙强,伍程斌. 全球海洋初级生产力时空异常变化对ENSO事件的响应[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(10): 1538-1549.
[7]	冯素云, 张凯选, 鹿琳琳. “海上丝绸之路”超大城市环境变化遥感分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(5): 602-612.
[8]	罗亮, 闫慧敏, 牛忠恩. 农田生产力监测中3种多源遥感数据融合方法的对比分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(2): 268-279.
[9]	李治, 杨晓梅, 孟樊, 陈曦, 杨丰硕. 城市建成区多源遥感协同提取方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(11): 1522-1529.
[10]	唐志光, 李弘毅, 王建, 梁继, 李朝奎, 车涛, 王欣. 基于多源数据的青藏高原雪深重建[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(7): 941-950.
[11]	胡晓东, 张新, 屈靖生. 大数据架构的遥感资源存储管理方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(5): 681-689.
[12]	廖小罕, 周成虎, 苏奋振, 卢海英, 岳焕印, 缑吉平. 无人机遥感众创时代[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(11): 1439-1448.
[13]	宋泳泽, 葛咏, 彭军还, 王劲峰, 任周鹏, 廖一兰. 疟疾预测的遗传规划方法与应用——以安徽省县（市）疟疾发病率为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2015, 17(8): 954-962.
[14]	王猛, 王军, 江煜, 马晓波. 汶川地震地质灾害遥感调查与空间特征分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2010, 12(4): 480-486.
[15]	黄万里, 李虎, 林广发, 余珊. 尺度变化的土地利用类型数据的综合研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2010, 12(3): 329-335.