基于高斯两步移动搜寻法的村镇避难场所可达性研究

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180192

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (10): 1412-1421.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180192

• 地球信息科学理论与方法 • 上一篇下一篇

基于高斯两步移动搜寻法的村镇避难场所可达性研究

但文羽^1,²(), 肖映辉^1,^2,^*(), 胡周灵^1,², 詹庆明^1,²

1. 武汉大学城市设计学院,武汉 430072
2. 武汉大学数字城市研究中心,武汉 430072

收稿日期:2018-04-16 修回日期:2018-07-27 出版日期:2018-10-25 发布日期:2018-10-17
通讯作者: 肖映辉 E-mail:2691604173@qq.com;344019209@qq.com
作者简介:
作者简介：但文羽（1993-）,女,硕士生,研究方向为数字城乡规划与管理。E-mail: 2691604173@qq.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目（2014BAL05B07）

Rural Emergency Shelter Accessibility Using Gaussian Based 2-step Floating Catchment Area Method

DAN Wenyu^1,²(), XIAO Yinghui^1,^2,^*(), HU Zhouling^1,², ZHAN Qingming^1,²

1. School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2. Research Center for Digital City, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2018-04-16 Revised:2018-07-27 Online:2018-10-25 Published:2018-10-17
Contact: XIAO Yinghui E-mail:2691604173@qq.com;344019209@qq.com
Supported by:
National Science and Technology Support Program, No.2014BAL05B07.

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

避难场所可达性是指避难场所与受灾居民之间的通达性,即灾害发生时,避难人员通过避难疏散通道到达避难场所的难易程度,是评价避难场所布局合理性的重要指标。本研究结合高斯两步移动搜寻法和网络分析法,从供需双向出发对村镇地区避难场所进行可达性分析。2种方法的结合,既充分考虑了需求点与设施点的相互作用,又充分考虑了设施点的吸引力随距离的衰减关系,并基于实际道路,以步行疏散时间作为搜索半径,降低了传统研究中因忽略供需间相互作用及实际距离而引起的可达性结果的误差。最后,以神农架松柏镇区为例,验证该方法的实际应用价值。结果表明,该方法能够有效测定村镇地区避难场所的空间可达性,同时,基于GIS软件可以直观地揭示研究区域内避难场所可达性空间分布差异。该方法可为制定科学的村镇防灾减灾规划提供方法支持。

关键词: 高斯两步移动搜寻法, 村镇防灾, 避难场所, 可达性, GIS

Abstract:

China has a vast area and frequent disasters. Due to the special geographical environment and the imperfect disaster prevention and reduction system, the rural areas have made it more difficult for people to take refuge. Refugees can use effective evacuation guidance to reach the shelters in the shortest time, which will reduce unnecessary casualties and improve the efficiency of rescue evacuation. Therefore, the layout of emergency shelters should consider the timeliness. The emergency shelter accessibility refers to the accessibility between emergency shelters and refugees. That is to evaluate, when disasters occur, how difficult it is for refugees to reach emergency shelters through evacuation routes. The emergency shelter accessibility is an important measurement for its rationality in spatial layout. The Gaussian based two-step floating catchment area method(Ga2SFCA) fully considers the interaction between the demand points and the facilities, it also considers the fading relationship between attraction and distance of facilities. The network analysis is based on the actual road and the results obtained are real and objective. Combining the two methods can reduce the accessibility error caused by neglecting the interaction and actual distance between supply and demand in traditional research and effectively determine the spatial distribution of the emergency shelters. Taken Songbai town in Shennongjia as an example, this study combined the Ga2SFCA with the network analysis and took multiple evacuation times as catchment sizes to analyze the rural emergency shelter accessibility. Finally, from the perspective of the evacuation demand of refuges, we analyzed the accessibility of vulnerable people to shelters in the study area. The results show that: this method can be applied to the research on accessibility of emergency shelters in rural area, and by GIS, the differences in accessibility space distribution of emergency shelters in the study area can be revealed directly. At the same time, this method can also provide support for the formulation of scientific rural disaster prevention and mitigation planning. When planning an emergency shelter, not only the accessibility of the sites but also the scale of the facilities and the configuration of the emergency infrastructure must be fully considered. Meanwhile, the emergency marking system should play a guiding role to enhance the emergency shelter accessibility from the refugees' behavior and psychology.

Key words: Gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area method (Ga2SFCA), rural disaster prevention, emergency shelter, accessibility, GIS

但文羽, 肖映辉, 胡周灵, 詹庆明. 基于高斯两步移动搜寻法的村镇避难场所可达性研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2018, 20(10): 1412-1421.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180192

DAN Wenyu,XIAO Yinghui,HU Zhouling,ZHAN Qingming. Rural Emergency Shelter Accessibility Using Gaussian Based 2-step Floating Catchment Area Method[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018, 20(10): 1412-1421.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180192

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

表1

表2

图4

图5

图6

表3

图7

图8

表4

参考文献 22

[1]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. >GB51143-2015防灾避难场所设计规划[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
	[ Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. GB51143-2015 Code for design of disasters mitigation emergency congregate shelter[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015. ]
[2]	Koenig J G.Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application[J]. Transportation, 1980,9(2):145-172. doi: 10.1007/BF00167128
[3]	Harris B.Accessibility: Concepts and applications[J]. Journal of Transportation & Statistics, 2001,4(2):15-30.
[4]	任若菡,王艳慧,何政伟,等.基于改进的两步移动搜寻法的贫困区小学教育资源空间可达性分析——以重庆市黔江区为例[J].地理信息世界,2014(2):22-28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1586.2014.02.006
	[ Ren R H, Wang Y H, He Z W, et al.Research on spatial accessibility of primary school education resources in poverty area based on modified two-step floating catchment area method: A case study of Qianjiang[J].Geomatics World, 2014(2):22-28. ] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1586.2014.02.006
[5]	宋正娜,陈雯.基于潜能模型的医疗设施空间可达性评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(6):848-854. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.06.003
	[ Song Z N, Chen W.Measuring spatial accessibility to health care facilities based on potential model[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009,28(6):848-854. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.06.003
[6]	陶卓霖,程杨,戴特奇.北京市养老设施空间可达性评价[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(5):616-624. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.003
	[ Tao Z L, Chen Y, Dai T Q.Measuring spatial accessibility to residential care facilities in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(5):616-624. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.05.003
[7]	叶明武,王军,刘耀龙,等.基于GIS的上海中心城区公园避难可达性研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,24(2):96-98.
	[ Ye M W, Wang J, Liu Y L, et al.Study on refuge accessibility of park in inner-city of Shanghai based on GIS technique[J]. Geography and Geo-information Science, 2008,24(2):96-98. ]
[8]	魏冶,修春亮,高瑞,等.基于高斯两步移动搜索法的沈阳市绿地可达性评价[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(4):479-487. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.005
	[ Wei Z, Xiu C L, Gao R, et al.Evaluation of green space accessibility of Shenyang using Gaussian based two-step floating catchment area method[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014,33(4):479-487. ] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.005
[9]	李明玉,李春玉,张晓东.延吉市城市开敞空间可达性研究[J].河南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2010,31(6):90-94.
	[ Li M Y, Li C Y, Zhang X D.Accessibility of urban open space in Yanji city[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology (Natural Science), 2010,31(6):90-94. ]
[10]	尹海伟,徐建刚.上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(6):71-76.
	[ Yin H W, Xu J G.Spatial accessibility and equity of parks in Shanghai[J]. Urban Studies, 2009,16(6):71-76. ]
[11]	Iacono M, Krizek K J, El-Geneidy A.Measuring non-motorized accessibility: Issues, alternatives, and execution[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010,18(1):133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.02.002
[12]	高颖玲. 紧急避难场所空间可达性分析——以杭州市上城区为例[J].中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版),2014(4):68-79.
	[ Gao Y L.Measuring spatial accessibility of emergency shelter: A case study in Shangcheng district, Hangzhou[J].Journal of the Graduates Sun Yat-Sen University(Social Sciences), 2014(4):68-79. ]
[13]	周爱华,张景秋,张远索,等.GIS下的北京城区应急避难场所空间布局与可达性研究[J].测绘通报,2016(1):111-114.
	[ Zhou A H, Zhang J Q, Zhang Y S, et al.Study on the emergency shelter accessibility and distribution in Beijing based on the GIS[J].Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2016(1):111-114. ]
[14]	Radke J, Mu L.Spatial decompositions, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs[J]. Geographic Information Sciences, 2000,6(2):105-112.
[15]	Luo W, Wang F.Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region[J]. Environment & Planning B Planning & Design 2003,30(6):865-884.
[16]	陶卓霖,程杨.两步移动搜寻法及其扩展形式研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(5):589-599.
	[ Tao Z L, Cheng Y.Research progress of the two-step floating catchment area method and extensions[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(5):589-599. ]
[17]	Dai D.Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene?[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011,102(4):234-244. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002
[18]	王绮,修春亮,魏冶,等.基于高斯两步移动搜索法的沈阳市就业可达性评价[J].人文地理,2015(2):78-82.
	[ Wang Q, Xiu C L, Wei Z, et al.Evaluation of job accessibility of Shenyang using Gaussian based two-step floating catchment area method[J].Human Geography, 2015(2):78-82. ]
[19]	潘勇卓,周廷刚,沈敬伟.Ga2SFCA下的公共图书馆可达性评价——以重庆主城区为例[J].图书馆论坛,2017(1):86-92.
	[ Pan Y Z, Zhou T G, Shen J W.Analysis of accessibility of public library based on Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method: A case study of the nine main districts of Chongqing[J].Library Tribune, 2017(1):86-92. ]
[20]	胡强. 山地城市避难场所可达性研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2010.
	[ Hu Q.Mountainous city shelter accessibility research[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2010. ]
[21]	初建宇. 防灾避难场所规划方法及其应用研究[D].天津:天津大学,2014.
	[ Chu J Y.Research on the methods for planning of emergency shelter and its application[D]. Tianjing: Tianjing University, 2014. ]
[22]	阚吉. 基于GIS的空间可达性评价方法研究[D].南京:东南大学,2015.
	[ Kan J.Spatial accessibility evaluation methods based on GIS[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2015. ]

避难场所名称	避难场所类型	避难场所面积/m²	综合评分	避难场所供给量/m²
社会福利中心空地	紧急避难场所	2247.04	1	449.41
道路运输管理局空地	紧急避难场所	2751.66	1	550.33
停车场	紧急避难场所	6131.26	3	3678.76
小区绿地	固定避难场所	6900.63	3	4140.38
神农架高中操场	固定避难场所	8257.63	4	6606.10
实验初级中学运动场	固定避难场所	19 248.20	4	15 398.56

数据类型	数据名称	数据格式	数据成果
基础地理信息数据	镇区建筑信息	CAD	应急保障基础设施分布
	镇区建筑信息	Shapefile	承灾体脆弱性评价
	滑坡易发性	TIFF	地质灾害强度评价
	泥石流易发性	TIFF
	崩塌易发性	TIFF
	地震易发性	TIFF
	0.2 m分辨率数字正射影像图	TIFF	人口分布
规划基础信息数据	居民点建设现状	CAD	人口分布
	交通建设现状	CAD	避难疏散通道
	避难场所规划	Shapefile	避难场所分布及供给量
建设规划数据	镇区规划（2013-2030）的文本和说明书	Word	分区

	不可达人口数/人	低可达人口数/人	一般可达人口数/人	较高可达人口数/人	高可达人口数/人	可达人数占比/%
0-5 min	14 020	2790	730	2470	1200	33.90
5-10 min	6860	10 200	700	2140	1310	67.66
10-15 min	2000	13 480	3830	440	1460	90.57
15-20 min	500	15 800	2500	890	1520	97.64

	不可达	低可达	一般可达	较高可达	高可达	可达人口
避难人口/人	790	6870	2950	460	1450	11 730
避难人口占比/%	6.31	54.87	23.56	3.67	11.58	93.69

基于高斯两步移动搜寻法的村镇避难场所可达性研究

Rural Emergency Shelter Accessibility Using Gaussian Based 2-step Floating Catchment Area Method

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	曹中浩, 张健钦, 杨木, 贾礼朋, 邓少存. 基于GIS新冠智能体仿真模型及应用——以广州市为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(2): 297-306.
[2]	李锐, 石佳豪, 董广胜, 刘朝辉. 多粒度时空对象组成结构表达研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(1): 113-123.
[3]	宋关福, 陈勇, 罗强, 武梦瑶. GIS基础软件技术体系发展及展望[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(1): 2-15.
[4]	姚可桢, 岳书平. 网络大数据下的中国现代食甜习惯空间分布特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1202-1215.
[5]	湛东升, 谢春鑫, 张文忠, 丁亮, 许婧雪, 甄茂成. 基于累计机会可达性的北京城市公共服务设施复合功能识别[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1320-1329.
[6]	赵耀龙, 巢子豪. 历史GIS的研究现状和发展趋势[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(5): 929-944.
[7]	朱亚茹, 高峻, 邴振华, 张中浩, 付晶. 基于参与式制图方法的景观服务评估与空间结构研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(5): 1106-1119.
[8]	王英杰, 张桐艳, 李鹏, 虞虎. GIS在中国旅游资源研究与应用中的现状及趋势[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 751-759.
[9]	杨艳昭, 郎婷婷, 张超, 贾琨. 基于GIS的“一带一路”地区气温插值方法比较研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 867-876.
[10]	单渌铱, 王海军, 张彬, 潘鹏. 顾及土地生态安全的环鄱阳湖城市群土地利用情景模拟[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(3): 543-556.
[11]	郑允豪, 刘晓慧. 面向就医地点推荐的个人时空可达性分析方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(2): 175-186.
[12]	李玉, 张黎明, 张兴国, 王昊, 张鑫港. 基于气象监测网络的森林火险快速预警模型[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(12): 2317-2325.
[13]	艾廷华, 雷英哲, 谢鹏, 周校东. 等时线模型支持下的深圳市综合医院空间可达性测度分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(1): 113-121.
[14]	宋关福, 卢浩, 王晨亮, 胡辰璞, 黄科佳. 人工智能GIS软件技术体系初探[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(1): 76-87.
[15]	刘晓慧,刘永伟,蔡菲,樊文平. 面向时空可达性的城市应急医疗机构推荐方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(9): 1411-1419.