长沙市游憩-居住功能空间格局及其匹配关系研究

doi:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210787

地球信息科学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (8): 1589-1603.doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210787

• 地理空间分析综合应用 • 上一篇下一篇

长沙市游憩-居住功能空间格局及其匹配关系研究

杨友宝¹(), 李琪², 韩国圣³^,^*(), 马丽君⁴

1.湖南师范大学旅游学院,长沙 410081
2.湖北文理学院美术学院,襄阳 441000
3.山东大学（威海）商学院,威海 264209
4.湘潭大学商学院,湘潭 411105

收稿日期:2021-12-07 修回日期:2022-01-17 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-10-25
通讯作者: *韩国圣（1975— ）,男,山东济宁人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事区域旅游地理与旅游规划研究。 E-mail: hanguosheng@sdu.edu.cn
作者简介:杨友宝（1987— ）,男,山东胶州人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要从事都市游憩休闲与地理大数据应用研究。E-mail: qdyyb1987@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41871123);国家自然科学基金项目(41971188);国家自然科学基金项目(42171215);湖南省教育厅优秀青年基金项目(18B034);湖南省自然科学基金项目(2021JJ30062)

Study on the Pattern Characteristics and Matching Relationship of Recreational and Residential Function Space in Changsha

YANG Youbao¹(), LI Qi², HAN Guosheng³^,^*(), MA Lijun⁴

1. School of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
2. College of Fine Arts, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441000, China
3. College of Business, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
4. College of Business, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China

Received:2021-12-07 Revised:2022-01-17 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-10-25
Contact: HAN Guosheng
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871123);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971188);National Natural Science Foundation of China(42171215);Excellent Youth Foundation of Hunan Education Administrative Department(18B034);Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province(2021JJ30062)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

伴随新型城镇化和全面休闲化时代到来,游憩-居住两大功能空间关系研究成为新时期城市地域结构领域的重要关注议题。基于POI地理空间大数据,通过运用Ripley's K函数、同位区位商、“不一致指数”定量模型和采用全局空间自相关、核密度估计等ArcGIS空间分析方法,探究了长沙市游憩-居住功能空间格局及其匹配关系特征。研究发现：① 两大功能空间均具有显著的空间正相关性,形态格局差异鲜明且均呈以“空间极核”为导向的集聚模式,各类型功能空间集聚强度表现为“居住空间>文化休闲空间>体育健身空间>商业娱乐空间>自然生态空间”;② 两大功能空间存在基于“距离-数量”的函数衰减关系,距离居住空间3000 m半径环带是游憩空间集中分布以及居民日常游憩休闲的重要活动范围;③ 居住空间具有“临近”游憩空间布局的指向特征,但反之不显著,两大功能空间呈单向吸引“非对称性”错位临近关系,居住空间临近不同类型游憩空间的指向强度呈“体育健身空间>文化休闲空间>自然生态空间>商业娱乐空间”位序格局;④ 游憩-居住功能空间协调关系具有较强的空间异质性,湘江西岸整体上优于东岸,岳麓区、望城区为游憩-居住协调型,天心区、芙蓉区、雨花区、开福区为游憩滞后居住型,长沙县为游憩超前居住型。本研究通过聚焦新型城镇化和全民休闲时代的城市游憩设施配置及其与居住空间的关系问题,将为丰富传承新背景趋势下的城市公共设施区位理论、城市空间结构理论等提供重要的理论探索方向,并为长沙市及国内同类大都市合理布局城市游憩休闲设施、优化调整城市空间结构和建设休闲宜居城市等提供科学参考。

关键词: 游憩空间, 居住空间, 格局特征, 匹配关系, 地理大数据, 长沙市

Abstract:

In an era of rapid urbanization and competitive entertainment, the relationship between recreational and residential function space has become an important issue in the field of urban regional structure. Based on POI geographic big data, by using the quantitative models such as Ripley's K function, colocation quotient, and inconsistency index, and adopting the ArcGIS spatial analysis methods for global spatial autocorrelation and kernel density estimation, this paper explores the spatial characteristics of recreational and residential function space and their relationships in Changsha. The results show that: (1) The two function spaces have significantly positive correlation at the spatial domain. The spatial patterns of different types of function spaces are significantly different but both present an agglomeration mode of "polar core of space". The agglomeration intensity of all types of function spaces is characterized by "residential space>cultural leisure space>sports and fitness space>commercial entertainment space>natural ecological space"; (2) The two function spaces have a function attenuation relationship based on "istance-quantity", and the circle radius of 3000m from the residential space is an important spatial area for the centralized distribution of recreational space and the residents' daily recreation; (3) The residential space has the spatial feature of "approaching" recreational space, but the reverse is not significant. The two function spaces show the "asymmetric" relation of one-way attraction, and the attraction level different types of recreational spaces to residential spaces is in the order of "sports and fitness space>cultural leisure space>natural ecological space>commercial entertainment space"; (4) There is strong spatial heterogeneity in the coordinated relation between recreational-residential function spaces. The west bank of Xiangjiang River is superior to the east bank. The Yuelu and Wangcheng Districts belong to recreational-residential coordination types. The Tianxin, Furong, Yuhua, and Kaifu districts are the recreation lagging residence type, while Changsha County is the type of the recreation advancing residence. This study focuses on the allocation of urban recreational facilities and their relationship with residential space in the era of new urbanization and national leisure, it provides theoretical exploration for enriching and inheriting urban public facilities location theory and urban spatial structure theory, and also provides scientific references for Changsha and other similar metropolises to rationally arrange urban recreational facilities, optimize urban spatial structure, and construct leisure livable city.

Key words: recreational space, residential space, pattern characteristics, matching relationship, geographic big data, Changsha city

杨友宝, 李琪, 韩国圣, 马丽君. 长沙市游憩-居住功能空间格局及其匹配关系研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(8): 1589-1603.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210787

YANG Youbao, LI Qi, HAN Guosheng, MA Lijun. Study on the Pattern Characteristics and Matching Relationship of Recreational and Residential Function Space in Changsha[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24(8): 1589-1603.DOI:10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210787

图/表 8

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

参考文献 38

[1]	周春山, 高军波. 转型期中国城市公共服务设施供给模式及其形成机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(3):272-279.
	[ Zhou C S, Gao J B. Provision pattern of urban public service facilities and its formation mechanism during transitional China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(3):272-279. ] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.03.003 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2011.03.003
[2]	Teitz M B. Toward a theory of urban public facility location[J]. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1968, 21(1):35-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1968.tb01439.x doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1968.tb01439.x
[3]	张华, 唐海波, 张岸. 北京首都功能核心区居住空间分区特征及形成机制[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(9):98-106,25.
	[ Tang H B, Zhang A. Study on the characteristics and formation mechanism of residential space division in the core area of capital functions of Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(9):98-106,25. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2019.09.017 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2019.09.017
[4]	Ball J V. Landscape preferences and behavior of visitors to Spanish National Parks[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1995, 29(2):145-160.
[5]	Muth R F. Cities and housing: the spatial patterns of urban residential land use[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
[6]	赵亮, 王婧. 武汉市城市游憩地空间布局研究[J]. 经济地理, 2009, 29(4):673-677.
	[ Zhao L, Wang J. Analysis on spatial distribution of urban recreation sites in Wuhan city[J]. Economic Geography, 2009, 29(4):673-677. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2009.04.026 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2009.04.026
[7]	吴志军, 田逢军. 基于空间句法的城市游憩空间形态特征分析——以南昌市主城区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2012, 32(6):156-161.
	[ Wu Z J, Tian F J. The analysis of urban recreational space shape characteristic and influencing factors based on space syntax: taking Nanchang as an example[J]. Economic Geography, 2012, 32(6):156-161. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2009.04.026 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2009.04.026
[8]	宋伟轩, 吴启焰, 朱喜钢. 新时期南京居住空间分异研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(6):685-694.
	[ Song W X, Wu Q Y, Zhu X G. Residential differentiation of Nanjing in the new period[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(6):685-694. ] DOI: 10.11821/xb201006006 doi: 10.11821/xb201006006
[9]	党宁, 吴必虎, 俞沁慧. 1970-2015年上海环城游憩带时空演变与动力机制研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2017, 32(11):81-94.
	[ Dang N, Wu B H, Yu Q H. The spatiotemporal evolution and dynamic mechanism of the Shanghai ReBAM from 1970 to2015[J]. TourismTribune, 2017, 32(11):81-94. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.11.014 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2017.11.014
[10]	周春山, 罗仁泽, 代丹丹. 2000-2010年广州市居住空间结构演变及机制分析[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(6):1109-1124. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201506010
	[ Zhou C S, Luo R Z, Dai D D. Evolution and mechanism of the residential spatial structure from 2000 to 2010 in Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(6):1109-1124. ] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201506010 doi: 10.11821/dlyj201506010
[11]	Hall T, Barrett H. Urban geography[M]. New York: Routledge Press, 2011.
[12]	Mafrolla E, D' Amico E. Does public spending improve citizens' quality of life? An analysis of municipalities' leisure supply[J]. Local Government Studies, 2016, 42(2):332-350. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1127224 doi: 10.1080/03003930.2015.1127224
[13]	Higgs G, Langford M, Norman P. Accessibility to sport facilities in Wales: A GIS-based analysis of socio-economic variations in provision[J]. Geoforum, 2015(62):105-120. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.010 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.010
[14]	Perry M A, Devan H, Fitzgerald H, et al. Accessibility and usability of parks and playgrounds[J]. Disability and Health Journal, 2018, 11(2):221-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.011 doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.011
[15]	Gatersleben B, Jackson T, Meadows J, et al. Leisure, materialism, well-being and the environment[J]. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 2018, 63(3):131-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2018.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2018.06.002
[16]	Sajin N B, Dahlan A, Ibrahim S A S. Quality of life and leisure participation amongst Malay older people in the institution[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016(234):83-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.222 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.222
[17]	Dai D. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene?[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 102(4):234-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002
[18]	Viniece J, April B, Osborne Jelks Na' Taki, et al. Urban green space and the pursuit of health equity in parts of the United States[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 2017, 14(11):1432. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111432 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111432
[19]	陈秋晓, 侯焱, 吴霜. 机会公平视角下绍兴城市公园绿地可达性评价[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36(3):375-383. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.03.008
	[ Chen Q X, Hou Y, Wu S. Assessment of accessibility to urban parks in Shaoxing city from the perspective of opportunity equity[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(3):375-383. ] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.03.008 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2016.03.008
[20]	李孟桐, 杨令宾, 魏冶. 高斯两步移动搜索法的模型研究——以上海市绿地可达性为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(8):990-996. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.08.008
	[ Li M T, Yang L B, Wei Y. Improved gaussian based 2-step floating catchment area method: a case study of green space accessibility in Shanghai[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(8):990-996. ] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.08.008 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.08.008
[21]	木皓可, 高宇, 王子尧, 等. 供需平衡视角下城市公园绿地服务水平与公平性评价研究——基于大数据的实证分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(11):10-15.
	[ Mu H K, Gao Y, Wang Z Y, et al. Equity evaluation of park green space service level from the perspective of supply and demand balance: an empirical analysis based on big data[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(11):10-15. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2019.11.012 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2019.11.012
[22]	吴健生, 司梦林, 李卫锋. 供需平衡视角下的城市公园绿地空间公平性分析——以深圳市福田区为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):2831-2838. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.011
	[ Wu J S, Si M L, Li W F. Spatial equity analysis of urban green space from the perspective of balance between supply and demand: a case study of Futian district, Shenzhen, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(9):2831-2838. ] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.011 doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.011
[23]	姚雪松, 冷红, 魏冶, 等. 基于老年人活动需求的城市公园供给评价——以长春市主城区为例[J]. 经济理, 2015, 35(11):218-224.
	[ Yao X S, Leng H, Wei Y, et al. Evaluation of city park supply based on the activities needs of the elderly: a case in Changchun city[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(11):218-224. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.11.031 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.11.031
[24]	李鑫, 马晓冬, 薛小同, 等. 城市绿地空间供需评价与布局优化——以徐州中心城区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(11):1771-1779. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.11.011
	[ Li X, Ma X D, Xue X T, et al. Spatial supply-demand evaluation and layout optimization for urban green space: a case study of Xuzhou central district[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(11):1771-1779. ] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.11.011 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.11.011
[25]	刘炳献, 钟家雨. 居民感知视角下的城市公共休闲空间研究——以珠海市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(10):228-233.
	[ Liu B X, Zhong J Y. The research on urban public leisure space with the perspective of residents' perception: taking Zhuhai city as an example[J]. Economic Geography, 2017, 37(10):228-233. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2017.10.029 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2017.10.029
[26]	张海霞, 周玲强. 城市居民公园游憩幸福感的因素构成与差异分析——以杭州市为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(9):1074-1081. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.09.1074
	[ Zhang H X, Zhou L Q. Factor components and differences of the park-based recreational happiness for urban residents: a case study of Hangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(9):1074-1081. ] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.09.007 doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.09.007
[27]	吴必虎, 董莉娜, 唐子颖. 公共游憩空间分类与属性研究[J]. 中国园林, 2003, 19(5):48-50.
	[ Wu B H, Dong L N, Tang Z Y. A study on categories and attributes of public urban recreational spaces[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2003, 19(5):48-50. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2003.05.014 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2003.05.014
[28]	秦学. 城市游憩空间结构系统分析——以宁波市为例[J]. 经济地理, 2003(2):267-271,288.
	[ Qin X. Systematic study on urban recreational spatial structure: a case study of Ningbo city[J]. Economic Geography, 2003(2):267-271,288. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2003.02.029 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2003.02.029
[29]	李仁杰, 郭风华, 安颖. 近十年北京环城游憩地类型与空间结构特征研究[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(1):118-122.
	[ Li R J, Guo F H, An Y. The structure of recreational space types and spatial pattern around Beijing metropolis in recent 10 years[J]. Human Geography, 2011, 26(1):118-122. ] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.01.009 doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2011.01.009
[30]	Anselin L. Longley P A, Goodchild M F, Maguire D J, et al (Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis[A].In: eds.).Geographical Information Systems, Principles, Techniques, Management Issues and Applications[C]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1999: 253-266.
[31]	高凯, 周志翔, 杨玉萍, 等. 基于Ripley K函数的武汉市景观格局特征及其变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(10):2621-2626.
	[ Gao K, Zhou Z X, Yang Y P, et al. Characteristics and changes of landscape pattern in Wuhan City based on Ripley's K function[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(10):2621-2626. ] DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0355 doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2010.0355
[32]	王法辉. 基于GIS的数量方法与应用[M].姜世国,滕骏华,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.
	[ Wang F H. The quantitative methods and application based on GIS[M]. JiangS G, Teng J Htrans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2009. ]
[33]	Leslie T F, Kronenfeld B J. The colocation quotient: a new measure of spatial association between categorical subsets of points[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2011, 43(3):306-326. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2011.00821.x doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2011.00821.x
[34]	闫东升, 杨槿. 长江三角洲人口与经济空间格局演变及影响因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(7):820-831. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.07.004
	[ Yan D S, Yang J. Inequality pattern of population and economic and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(7):820-831. ] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.07.004 doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.07.004
[35]	王新越, 曹婵婵. 青岛市居民休闲与居住空间结构及其匹配关系[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9):156-163.
	[ Wang X Y, Cao C C. Leisure and residential space structure and its matching relationship of Qingdao residents[J]. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(9):156-163. ] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.09.019 doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.09.019
[36]	高子轶, 张海峰, 马晓帆. 西宁市居住空间与公共服务设施空间协调性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(2):64-72.
	[ Gao Z Y, Zhang H F, Ma X F. Spatial coordination relationship between living space and public service facilities space in Xining city[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(2):64-72. ] DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.37 doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2020.37
[37]	肖作鹏, 柴彦威, 张艳. 国内外生活圈规划研究与规划实践进展述评[J]. 规划师, 2014, 30(10):89-95.
	[ Xiao Z P, Chai Y W, Zhang Y. Overseas life circle planning and practice[J]. Planners, 2014, 30(10):89-95. ] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2014.10.016 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2014.10.016
[38]	申庆喜, 李诚固, 刘仲仪, 等. 长春市公共服务设施空间与居住空间格局特征[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11):2249-2258. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811010
	[ Shen Q X, Li C G, Liu Z Y, et al. Spatial pattern of public service facilities space and living space in Changchun[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11):2249-2258. ] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201811010 doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811010

功能空间	Moran' I指数	预期指数	方差	Z得分	P值
游憩空间	0.172 236	-0.000 815	0.005 401	2.354 726	0.018 536
居住空间	0.452 252	-0.000 300	0.000 095	46.348 700	0.000 000

游憩空间类型	不一致指数
游憩空间类型	游憩滞后居住型	游憩-居住协调型	游憩超前居住型
自然生态类	0.497~0.952	0.952~1.597	1.597~14.964
商业娱乐类	0.679~0.847	0.847~1.612	1.612~19.785
文化休闲类	0.000~0.597	0.597~1.207	1.207~19.258
体育健身类	0.000~0.559	0.559~1.159	1.159~19.741

长沙市游憩-居住功能空间格局及其匹配关系研究

Study on the Pattern Characteristics and Matching Relationship of Recreational and Residential Function Space in Changsha

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 38

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

空间划分	区（县）	自然生态类	商业娱乐类	文化休闲类	体育健身类	综合评价
湘江东岸	天心区	滞后	滞后	协调	协调	滞后
	芙蓉区	滞后	滞后	协调	滞后		滞后
	雨花区	滞后	滞后	滞后	协调		滞后
	开福区	滞后	滞后	协调	协调		滞后
	长沙县	超前	超前	超前	超前		超前
湘江西岸	岳麓区	协调	协调	协调	协调		协调
湘江西岸	望城区	协调	协调	协调	协调		协调

[1]	王卷乐, 李姝晗, 王玉洁, 段博文, 周佳玲. 自然灾害综合风险普查中的质量检查方法研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(9): 1765-1773.
[2]	薛山, 廖一兰, 李春林, 胡艺. 不同人口流动模式下城市传染病时空传播模型适用性研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2023, 25(1): 208-222.
[3]	唐璐, 许捍卫, 丁彦文. 融合多源地理大数据的城市街区综合活力评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(8): 1575-1588.
[4]	黄钦, 杨波, 徐新创, 郝汉舟, 梁莉莉, 王敏. 基于多源空间数据和随机森林模型的长沙市茶颜悦色门店选址与预测研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(4): 723-737.
[5]	戴云哲, 杨建新, 龚健, 叶菁, 李靖业, 李云. AutoPaCA:耦合过程-模式的城镇空间增长模拟模型[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(1): 87-99.
[6]	胡姗, 葛咏, 刘梦晓. 地球信息科学技术在中国减贫中的应用进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(8): 1339-1350.
[7]	江东, 陈帅, 付晶莹, 郝蒙蒙. GIS支持下的全球武装冲突数据体系建设评介[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 784-791.
[8]	邓敏, 蔡建南, 杨文涛, 唐建波, 杨学习, 刘启亮, 石岩. 多模态地理大数据时空分析方法[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(1): 41-56.
[9]	徐晓宇, 李梅. 基于开源大数据的北京地区餐饮业空间分布格局[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(2): 215-225.
[10]	卫春阳, 徐丹丹, 董凯凯, 刘兆礼. 遥感影像空间格局变异函数分析研究进展[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(4): 540-548.
[11]	余靖毅, 邬伦, 高勇. 基于Storm的地理编码引擎[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2015, 17(12): 1431-1441.