本期要文(可全文下载)

基于数字高程模型的旅游地文化景观语义感知分析 ——以清西陵选址文化为例

展开
  • 1. 河北师范大学资源与环境科学学院,石家庄 050016;
    2. 河北省环境演变与生态建设实验室,石家庄 050016
叶妍君(1988-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:GIS空间建模。E-mail:cicelyyeah@gmail.com

收稿日期: 2012-04-09

  修回日期: 2012-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2012-10-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41171105、40971089、40701137);河北省高校重点学科建设项目。

A DEM Based Semantic Perception of Culture Landscape in the Tourist Destination of the Western Qing Tombs

Expand
  • 1. College of Resources and Environment Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050016, China;
    2. Hebei Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Ecological Construction, Shijiazhuang 050016, China

Received date: 2012-04-09

  Revised date: 2012-10-09

  Online published: 2012-10-25

摘要

景观感知对旅游地规划设计具有基础性作用,但人文旅游地内部的景观感知空间分异至今没有微观尺度上的研究方法出现。本文提出了景观视角分组基础上的景观语义特征点抽象方法,并建立了单文化景观和多文化景观语义感知度计算模型,以解决人文类型旅游地内部景观感知的强度空间分异计算问题。利用数字高程模型,在清西陵旅游地实现了文化景观语义感知度的实证研究:以中国传统的皇家陵寝选址文化及其表征的封建等级体系为语义准则,提取了4个代表性陵墓文化景观不同景观视角下的78个特征点,并赋予不同景观视角及每个特征点相应权重系数;利用视域分析、叠置分析等方法计算得到旅游地景观文化感知度;尝试利用感知度计算结果对现有观光线路进行观景点语义挖掘并设计了优化方案。论文为人文地理学景观感知定量化表达提供了思路,为旅游地规划、景观与线路设计等提供了技术途径。

本文引用格式

叶妍君, 李仁杰*, 傅学庆, 张军海 . 基于数字高程模型的旅游地文化景观语义感知分析 ——以清西陵选址文化为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2012 , 14(5) : 576 -583 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2012.00576

Abstract

Landscape perception plays a basic role in the planning of tourist destination. But there has not been research methods appeared at the micro-scale so far. This paper presents an abstract method for feature point based on the classification of landscape perception. And a calculation model of the semantic meaning perception degree about both single and multiple cultural landscapes is established to solve the perception problems occurred inside the humanistic tourist destination. An empirical research of semantic meaning perception of landscape was realized in the study of The Western Tombs of the Qing dynasty by using the DEM. According to traditional Chinese culture, this paper extracted 78 feature points from different landscape perspectives in 4 representative mausoleums which were given corresponding weights to figure out the perception degrees of the points. And based on the mining of the meaning of the landscapes in the sightseeing route, the viewpoints were designed. It offered a research approach to the quantitative description of landscape perception and method reference to the planning of tourist destination, the design and improvement of landscapes and sightseeing routes. By adopting the thoughts of cartographic generalization and the abstract method of feature point for landscape meaning, this paper established a virtual sight of tourist destination based on DEM and high quality data source to study the cultural landscape meaning perception. The result of this paper provides a foundation of quantitative evaluation of selection of the best sightseeing point of single and multiple cultural landscapes, and it means greatly as a reference in the study of inside cultural landscape of humanistic tourist destination of geo-science. It gives the tourist guides the best places for their explanations and a feasible method for transferring the cultural connotation of humanistic tourist destination to the tourists complementally and abundantly.

参考文献

[1] Hughes H L. Culture as a tourist resource: A theoretical consideration[J].Tourism Management,1987,30(8):205-206.

[2] 章采烈. 论旅游文化是旅游业发展的灵魂[J].上海大学学报:社科版,1994(1):70-74.

[3] 周盼,李明德. 旅游文化是旅游理论研究的重要课题:旅游文化座谈会纪要[J].旅游刊,1991,6(1):55-56.

[4] Zube E H, Sell J L, Taylor J G. Landscape perception: Research, application and theory[J].Landscape Planning, 1982,9(1):1-33.

[5] Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The experience of nature: A psychological perspective[M].New York: Cambridge University Press,1989.

[6] Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape[J]. Land Use Policy,2009,26S:S62-S75.

[7] De Groot W T, Van den Born R J G. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in the Netherlands[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,63(3):127-138.

[8] 俞孔坚.景观敏感度与景观阈值评价研究[J].地理研究,1991,10(2):38-51.

[9] Daniel T C. Whither Scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,54(1-4):267-281.

[10] 吴必虎. 小兴安岭风景道旅游景观评价[J].地理学报,2001,56(2):214-222.

[11] 汪侠,顾朝林,梅虎. 旅游景区顾客的满意度指数模型[J].地理学报,2005,60(5):807-816.

[12] 王群,丁祖荣,章锦河,等. 旅游环境游客满意度的指数测评模型——以黄山风景区为例[J].地理研究,2006,25(1): 171-181.

[13] 张朝枝.孙晓静.卢玉平. "文化是旅游的灵魂":误解与反思——武夷山案例研究[J].旅游学刊,2010(2):61-68.

[14] 黄震方,俞肇元,黄振林,等. 主题型文化旅游区的阶段性演进及其驱动机制——以无锡灵山景区为例[J].地理学报,2011,66(6):831-841.

[15] 李东和,张捷,章尚正,等.居民旅游影响感知和态度的空间分异——以黄山风景区为例[J].地理研究,2008,27(4):963-972.

[16] 唐文跃,张捷,罗浩,等. 九寨沟自然观光地旅游者地方感特征分析[J].地理学报,2007,62(6):599-608.

[17] 李仁杰,路紫,李继峰. 山岳型风景区观光线路景观感知敏感度计算方法——以武安国家地质公园奇峡谷景区为例[J].地理学报,2011,66(2):245-256.

[18] Honjo T, Lim E-M. Virtualization of landscape by VRML system[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 55(3):175-183.

[19] Lim E-M, Honjo T. Three-dimensional virtualization forest of landscape by VRML[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003,63(3):175-186.

[20] 苗雪兰. 基于Java和VRML的旅游地理信息系统[J].计算机工程,2005,31(17):228-230.

[21] 张大坤,薛忠明. 基于Java3D的虚拟艺术馆开发技术[J].沈阳工业大学学报,2004,26(5):547-550.

[22] 王森,王萍,王昱颖,等. 大规模VRML虚拟场景的快速浏览算法[J].系统仿真学报,2006,18(1):170-172.

[23] 李仁杰,路紫. 主题公园多细节层次景观语义模型与虚拟表述——以北京延庆县水土保持科技示范园为例[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(4):504-512.

[24] Ervin S M. Digital landscape modeling and visualization: a research agenda[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,54(1-4):49-62.

[25] Orland B, Budthimedhee K, Uusitalo J. Considering virtual World as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,54(1-4):139-148.

[26] 曾宏达. 基于DEM和地统计的森林资源空间格局分析-以武夷山山区为例[J].地球信息科学,2005,7(2):82-88.

[27] 朱红春,张友顺,汤国安,等. 基于DEM的黄土地貌类型提取与制图——以黄土高原丘陵沟壑实验样区为例[J].地球信息科学,2003,5(4):110-113.

[28] 俞孔坚.理想景观探源[M].北京:商务印书馆,1998,20-23.

文章导航

/