遥感科学与应用技术

京津唐地区城市扩张对地表蒸散发的影响

展开
  • 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学, 北京100049
唐婷(1988-),女,四川人,硕士生,研究方向为土地利用/覆被变化。E-mail:tangting528@gmail.com

收稿日期: 2012-12-10

  修回日期: 2013-01-22

  网络出版日期: 2013-04-18

基金资助

国家重点基础研究发展计划(2009CB421307);国家自然科学基金项目(41171083/U1203181)。

Urbanization and Its Impact on the Evapotranspiration in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Area

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2012-12-10

  Revised date: 2013-01-22

  Online published: 2013-04-18

摘要

以京津唐地区为例, 基于SEBS模型, 利用MODIS遥感数据和气象数据, 计算了2000、2005和2010年四季代表月份的平均日蒸散发量, 并结合3期土地利用图, 定量评估了由城市扩张引起的日蒸散发量的变化。结果表明, 不同土地利用类型的日蒸散发量在不同季节表现出不同的分布规律, 春、夏和秋季的日蒸散发量分布规律为水域>林地>草地>耕地>城市用地, 冬季的日蒸散发量在三年的分布不一致:2000年为林地>草地>水域>城市用地>耕地, 2005年为水域>林地>草地>耕地>城市用地, 2010年为林地>水域>草地>城市用地>耕地。以研究区土地利用变化不明显的区域为背景区域, 评估了除土地利用/覆被变化外的其他因素对京津唐地区夏季日蒸散发的影响。除去该影响后得出土地利用/覆被变化, 对日蒸散发的影响, 结果表明, 各土地利用类型转化为城市用地会使日蒸散发降低, 且水域转化成城市用地后, 其日蒸散发量降低最多, 2000-2005年降低了0.977mm, 2000-2010年其降低值为0.983mm。

本文引用格式

唐婷, 冉圣宏, 谈明洪 . 京津唐地区城市扩张对地表蒸散发的影响[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2013 , 15(2) : 233 -240 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00233

Abstract

Evapotranspiration(ET) is a key of water resources management. Even in the same climatic and meteorological conditions, ET may have a different value among different land use / land cover. So it’s important to estimate the distribution of the ET. The main objectives of this study are: (1) to estimate ET of different land use / land cover in different seasons; and (2) to find out the impact of urbanization on ET. In this article, based on SEBS model, remote sensing data and meteorological data were used to calculate the average daily ET of Beijing- Tianjin-Tangshan Area. Combined the information of land use / land cover changed area and the result of ET estimation map, the total change of ET could be calculated. Taking ET of land cover pixels without any change as the control plots and ruling out the change of ET of the background then isolated the impact of LUCC on ET in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Area. We found out the temporal distribution of daily ET in the four seasons was decreased gradually in the sequence of summer, spring, fall and winter. Furthermore, the spatial distribution was that the ET decreased gradually in the sequence of water area, woodland, grassland, cultivated land and urban land in summer, spring and fall. The sequence of daily ET in winter for the three years was different. In 2000, it was the ET of forest > grassland > water area > urban land > farmland; in 2005, it was ET of water area > forest > grassland > farmland > urban land; and in 2010, it was ET of forest > water area > grassland> urban land > farmland. Finally, besides the effect of non-land use factors, ET decreased when land use convert to urban land. When land use converts from water area to urban land, the decrease of ET was the most significant, the following was grassland, woodland and cultivated land in sequence.

参考文献

[1] Rosenberg N J, Blad B L, Verma S B. Microclimate: the biologicalenvironment[M].Wiley-Interscience,1983.

[2] 刘绍民,孙睿,孙中平,等.基于互补相关原理的区域蒸散量估算模型比较[J].地理学报,2004,59(3):331-340.

[3] 张永强,刘昌明,于强.土壤-植被-大气系统水和热传输机理及区域蒸散模型[J].中国科学院研究生院学报,2004,21(4):562-567.

[4] 金翠,张柏,宋开山,等.土地利用/覆被变化对区域蒸散发影响的遥感分析——以吉林省乾安县为例[J].干旱区研究,2009,26(5):734-743.

[5] Liu W, Hong Y, Khan S I, et al. Actual evapotranspirationestimation for different land use and land cover in urban regionsusing Landsat 5 data[J]. Journal of Applied RemoteSensing, 2010,4(41873):1169-1179.

[6] 倪猛,陈波,岳建华,等.洛河流域蒸散发遥感反演及其与各参数的相关性分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2007,23(6):34-37.

[7] 刘强,何岩,崔保山.洮儿河流域土地利用变化对地表蒸散量的影响[J].资源科学,2007,29(4):121-126.

[8] 王强,康慕谊,邢开雄,等.基于SEBAL模型的冀蒙接壤区ET 反演[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,47(1):91-96.

[9] 韩惠,闫浩文,马世英.基于遥感技术的祖厉河流域LUCC与蒸散发研究[J].测绘科学,2009,34(6):65-67.

[10] 曾丽红,宋开山,张柏,等.松嫩平原不同地表覆盖蒸散特征的遥感研究[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(9):233-242.

[11] 张殿君,张学霞,武鹏飞.黄土高原典型流域土地利用变化对蒸散发影响研究[J]. 干旱区地理,2011,34(3):400-408.

[12] 匡文慧,刘纪远,邵全琴,等.区域尺度城市增长时空动态模型及其应用[J].地理学报,2011,66(2):178-188.

[13] Jia Z, Liu S, Xu Z, et al. Validation of remotely sensedevapotranspiration over the Hai River Basin, China[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2012,117(D13):1-21.

[14] Liu S M, Xu Z, Jia Z, et al. Measurements of evapotranspirationfrom eddy-covariance systems and large aperturescintillometers in the Hai River Basin, China[J]. Journalof Hydrology, 2013, in review.

[15] Liu S M, Xu Z W, Wang W Z, et al. A comparison of eddy-covariance and large aperture scintillometers with respectto the energy balance closure problem[J]. Hydrologyand Earth System Sciences, 2011,15(1):1291-1306.

[16] Su Z, Pelgrum H, Menenti M. Aggregation effects of surfaceheterogeneity in land surface processes[J]. Hydrologyand Earth System Sciences, 1999,3(4):549-563.

[17] 杨永民,冯兆东,周剑.基于SEBS模型的黑河流域蒸散发[J].兰州大学学报,2008,44(5):1-6.

[18] 杜嘉,张伯,宋开山,等.基于NOAA/AVHRR 数据估算三江平原蒸散发量研究初探[J].水土保持研究,2009,16(2):56-62.

[19] Kustas W P, Daughtry C S T. Estmation of the soil heatfluc / net radiation ratio from spectral data[J]. Agr FroestMeteor, 1989,49(1):205-223.

[20] Su Z. The surface energy balance system (SEBS) for estimationof turbulent heat fluxes[J]. Hydrology and EarthSystem Sciences, 2002,6(1):85-100.

[21] Menenti M, Choudhury B J. Parameterization of land surfaceevaporation by means of location dependent potentialevaporation and surface temperature range[J]. Parameterizationof Land Surface Evaporation, 1993,202(1):561-568.

[22] Choudhury B J and Monteith J L. A four layer model forthe heat budget of homogeneous land surfaces[J]. Quart.J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 1988,114(1):373–398.

[23] Brutsaert W. Aspects of bulk atmospheric boundary layersimilarity under free-convective conditions[J]. Reviewsof Geophysics, 1999,37(4):439-452.

[24] 高彦春,龙笛.遥感蒸散发模型研究进展[J].遥感学报,2008,12(3):515-528.

[25] Su Z, Jacobs C. Advanced earth observation-land surfaceclimate: Final report[M].Netherlands Remote SensingBoard BCRS, 2001.

[26] Pelgrum H. Spatial aggregation of land surface characteristics:impact of resolution of remote sensing data on landsurface modelling.[M]. Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen(Wageningen Agricultural University), 2000.

[27] 张长春,王光谦,魏加华.基于遥感方法的黄河三角洲生态需水量研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(1):149-152.

[28] 高志球,卞林根,逯昌贵,等.城市下垫面空气动力学参数的估算[J].应用气象学报,2002,13(1):26-33.

[29] 刘小莽,郑红星,刘昌明,等.海河流域潜在蒸散发的气候敏感性分析[J].资源科学,2009,31(9):1470-1476.

[30] 刘昌明,张丹.中国地表潜在蒸散发敏感性的时空变化特征分析[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):579-588.

[31] 王新菊,库路巴依.新疆地区气象要素变化对潜在蒸散发量的影响[J].人民黄河,2012,34(10):77-79.

[32] 张志明,骆红.大气温室效应增强对实际蒸散发量的影响[J].成都科技大学学报,1995,83(2):1-5.

[33] Liu S, Hu G, Lu L, et al. Estimation of regional evapotranspirationby TM/ETM+ data over heterogeneous surfaces[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,2007,73(10):1169-1178.
Options
文章导航

/