东北典型林区雪深反演算法的验证与分析
收稿日期: 2013-04-12
修回日期: 2013-05-16
网络出版日期: 2014-03-10
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目“东北地区季节性积雪层中雪粒径的谱分布特征与微波（辐射、散射）特性研究”（41001201）；国家高技术研究发展计划（“863计划”）“遥感产品真实性检验关键技术及其试验验证”（2012AA12A305-5-2）。
Validation and Analysis of Snow Depth Inversion Algorithm in Northeast Typical Forest Based on the FY3B-MWRI Data
Received date: 2013-04-12
Revised date: 2013-05-16
Online published: 2014-03-10
积雪对自然环境和人类活动都有极其重要的影响。积雪参数（雪面积、雪深和雪水当量）反演对水文模型和气候变化研究有着实际的意义。然而，目前森林区的雪深遥感反演精度一直有待于进一步提高。东北地区是我国最大的天然林区和重要的季节性积雪区之一，本文利用FY3B卫星微波成像仪（MWRI）L1级亮温数据和L2级雪水当量数据，以及东北典型林区野外实测雪深数据，对Chang算法、NASA 96算法和FY3B雪深业务化反演算法进行了验证与分析。结果表明：在东北典型林区的雪深反演中，Chang算法和NASA 96算法反演的雪深波动都比较大，当森林覆盖度f≤0.6时，NASA 96算法表现比较好，均方根误差值在3种算法中较小，但当f >0.6时，NASA 96算法失真严重。当考虑纯森林像元（f=1）时，Chang算法低估了雪深47%。当f≤0.3时，FY3B业务化算法始终优于Chang算法。整体上，FY3B业务化算法相对稳定，具有较高的精度。
武黎黎, 李晓峰, 赵凯, 郑兴明, 戴礼云 . 东北典型林区雪深反演算法的验证与分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014 , 16(2) : 320 -327 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2014.00320
Snow cover is one of the active components of the cryosphere. Snow cover has a very important impact on the natural environment and human activities. Snow parameters (snow area, snow depth and snow water equivalent) inversion has practical significance to hydrological models and climate change research. However, the accuracy of snow depth inversion of remote sensing in the forest area should be further improved at present. Northeast is one of China's largest natural forest areas and important seasonal snow areas. This paper used L1 level brightness temperature data and L2 level snow water equivalent data of Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI) mounted on FY3B satellite, and used field snow depth data in Northeast typical forest regions. Chang algorithm, NASA 96 algorithm and FY3B operational inversion algorithm were validated and analyzed. The results showed that, in Northeast typical forest regions, the retrieved snow depth of Chang algorithm and NASA 96 algorithm had large fluctuations. The performance of NASA 96 algorithm was better than Chang algorithm and FY3B operational inversion algorithm when fractional forest cover (f) was 0.6 or less, because the root mean square error value of NASA 96 algorithm was smaller than the other two algorithms. However, NASA96 algorithm had serious distortion when f was bigger than 0.6. Considering the pure forest pixel (f=1), Chang algorithm underestimated the snow depth of 47%. When f was 0.3 or less, FY3B operational inversion algorithm is better than Chang algorithm. On the whole, FY3B operational algorithm was relatively stable, and FY3B operational algorithm had higher accuracy compared with Chang algorithm and NASA 96 algorithm.
Key words： microwave remote sensing; FY3B-MWRI; snow depth inversion; snow cover
[1] 曹梅盛,李培基,Robinson D A,等.中国西部积雪SMMR 微波遥感的评价与初步应用[J].环境遥感,1993,8(4):260-269.
[2] Robinson D, Dewey K, Heim R. Global snow cover monitoring: An update[J]. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, 1993,74(9):1689-1696.
[3] Che T, Li X, Jin R, et al. Snow depth derived from passive microwave remote-sensing data in China[J]. Annals of Glaciology, 2008(49):145-154.
[4] 吴杨,张佳华,徐海明,等.卫星反演积雪信息的研究进展[J].气象,2007,33(6):3-10.
[5] Kunzi K F, Patil S, Rott H. Snow cover parameters retrieved from NIMBUS-7 Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR) data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1982,20(4):452-467.
[6] Chang A T C, Foster J L, Hall D K, et al. Snow water equivalent estimation by microwave radiometry[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 1982,5(3):259-267.
[7] Ulaby F T, Moore R K, Fung A K. Microwave remote sensing: Active and passive. Volume II: Radar Remote Sensing and Surface Scattering and Emission Theory[M]. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1982,457-1064.
[8] Foster J L, Hall D K, Chang A T C, et al. An overview of passive microwave snow research and results[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1984,22(2):195-208.
[9] Hall D K, Foster J L, Chang A T C. NIMBUS-7 SMMR polarization responses to snow depth in the mid western United States[J]. Nordic Hydrology, 1984,15(1):1-8.
[10] Hall D K, Martinec J. Remote Sensing of Snow and Ice[M]. London: Chapman and Hall, 1985,1-189.
[11] Ulaby F T, Moore R K, Fung A K. Microwave remote sensing: Active and passive. Volume III: from Theory to Applications[M]. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 1986,1065-2162.
[12] Hall D K, Sturm M, Benson C S, et al. Passive microwave remote and in situ measurements of arctic and sub-arctic snow covers in Alaska[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1991,38(3):161-172.
[13] Chang A T C, Tsang L. A neural network approach to inversion of snow water equivalent from passive microwave measurements [J]. Nordic Hydrology, 1992, 23(3):173-182.
[14] Wang J R, Chang A T C, Sharma A K. On the estimation of snow depth from microwave radiometric measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992,30(4):785-792.
[15] Tsang L, Chen Z, Oh S, et al. Inversion of snow parameters from passive microwave remote sensing measurements by a neural network trained with a multiple scattering model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992,30(5):1015-1024.
[16] Armstrong R L, Chang A T C, Rango A, et al. Snow depths and grain size relationships with relevance for passive microwave studies[J]. Annals of Glaciology, 1993(17):171-176.
[17] Davis D T, Chen Z X, Hwang J N, et al. Retrieval of snow parameters by iterative inversion of a neural-network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1993,31(4):842-852.
[18] Rango A. Snow hydrology processes and remote sensing[J]. Hydrological Processes, 1993,7(2):121-138.
[19] Konig M, Winther J G, Isaksson E. Measuring snow and glacier ice properties from satellite[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2001,39(1):1-27.
[20] Schmugge T J, Kustas W P, Ritchie J C, et al. Remote sensing in hydrology[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2002,25(8-12):1367-1385.
[21] 曹梅盛,李新,陈贤章,等.冰冻圈遥感[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[22] Chang A T C, Foster J L, Hall D K. Nimbus-7 SMMR derived global snow cover parameters[J]. Annals of Glaciology, 1987(9):39-44.
[23] Foster J L, Chang A, Hall D K. Comparison of snow mass estimates from prototype passive microwave snow algorithm, a revised algorithm and a snow depth climatology[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997,62(2):132-142.
[24] Jiang L M, Wang P, Zhang L X, et al. Improvement of snow depth retrieval for FY3B-MWRI in China[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2013 (in press).
[25] Chang A T C, Foster J L, Rango A. Utilization of surface cover composition to improve t he microwave determination of snow water equivalent in a mountain basin[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1991,12(11):2311-2319.
[26] Chang A T C, Foster J L, Hall D K, et al. Snow parameters derived from microwave measurement s during the BOREAS winter field campaign[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997,102(D24):29663-29671.
[27] Foster J L, Chang A T C, Hall D K, et al. Derivation of snow water equivalent in boreal forest s using microwave radiometry[J]. Arctic, 1991(44):147-152.
[28] Foster J, Liston G, Koster R, et al. Snow cover and snow mass intercomparisons of general circulation models and remotely sensed datasets[J]. Journal of Climate, 1996,9(2):409-426.
[29] 李新,车涛.积雪被动微波遥感研究进展[J].冰川冻土,2007,29(3):487-496.
[30] 冉有华,李新,卢玲.基于多源数据融合方法的中国1km土地覆盖分类制图[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(2):192-203.
[31] Foster J L, Sun C, Walker J P, et al. Quantifying the uncertainty in passive microwave snow water equivalent observations[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2005,94(2):187-203.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |