不同时间间隔下的遥感时间序列重构模型比较分析
作者简介:周惠慧(1991-),女,硕士生,主要从事遥感时间序列分析与应用。E-mail: zhouhh@radi.ac.cn
收稿日期: 2015-12-22
要求修回日期: 2016-04-25
网络出版日期: 2016-10-25
基金资助
国家“863”计划项目(2012AA12A301)
国家自然科学基金项目(41371359)
中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所所长青年基金项目(Y5SJ2000CX)
Comparison and Analysis of Remotely Sensed Time Series of Reconstruction Models at Various Intervals
Received date: 2015-12-22
Request revised date: 2016-04-25
Online published: 2016-10-25
Copyright
遥感时间序列被广泛用于地表信息探测。然而受传感器和外部条件的影响,时间序列存在不同程度的噪声。时间序列重构模型能够实现时间序列去噪,但不同重构模型应用于不同时间间隔时间序列的精度不同。本文以辽宁省朝阳市为研究区,分别利用1、4、8、16和30 d间隔归一化植被指数(Normalized Difference Vegetable Index, NDVI)时间序列,进行模拟数据实验和物候监测实验,从波形还原能力和物候期提取精度2方面,评价了SG滤波、DL拟合、HANTS 3种模型在不同时间间隔下的重构效果。结果表明,SG滤波模型适用于较大时间间隔的时间序列数据,DL拟合模型适用于较小时间间隔的时间序列数据,HANTS模型对较小间隔的时间序列重构精度较低。在此基础上,从模型自身的角度分析了3者在不同时间间隔下表现的原因,并为面向不同时间间隔时间序列数据的重构模型选择提供了参考。
周惠慧 , 王楠 , 黄瑶 , 王晋年 , 张立福 . 不同时间间隔下的遥感时间序列重构模型比较分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016 , 18(10) : 1410 -1417 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2016.01410
Remotely sensed time series are being widely used in land surface information detection. However, influenced by the sensors and external conditions, different levels of noises exist in the remotely sensed time series. Although reconstruction models can reduce the noises in times series effectively, different reconstruction models provide different levels of accuracy when they are used at various intervals. This study took the city of Chaoyang in Liaoning Province as a case. We utilized the time series of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) at intervals of 1-day, 4-day, 8-day, 16-day and 30-day, respectively, to carry out experiments of simulation and phenology observation. We also assessed the reconstruction results of the SG filter model, the DL fitting model and the HANTS model based on their capabilities of keeping waveform of time series and their accuracy of phenological date extraction. In addition, we also analyzed sensitivity of these three models to various intervals. The results showed that the SG filter model performed better at larger intervals, the DL fitting model gave better reconstruction accuracy at smaller intervals and the Hants model gave better accuracy when it is used at larger intervals. Moreover, the reasons of the different performance of the three reconstruction models were analyzed from the theories of these models. On this basis, we gave the suggestions on the choice of reconstruction models of time series at different intervals.
Key words: remote sensing; time series; reconstruction model; time intervals
Fig. 1 Location of the study area图1 研究区地理位置 |
Tab. 1 The phenological stages and corresponding dates recorded at observational sites表1 地面站点记录的物候发育期及对应日期 |
出苗 | 拔节 | 抽穗 | 乳熟 | 成熟 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
日期 | 5月22日 | 6月28日 | 7月24日 | 8月26日 | 9月18日 |
Tab. 2 Statistical indicators and the computing methods表2 统计指标及其计算方法 |
指标名称 | 意义 | 指标名称 | 意义 |
---|---|---|---|
MIN | 时间序列最小值 | MIN_t | 时间序列最小值出现时间 |
MAX | 时间序列最大值 | MAX_t | 时间序列最大值出现时间 |
MID | 时间序列中值 | MID_t | 时间序列中值出现时间 |
MEAN | 时间序列平均值 |
Tab. 3 Phenological stages and the retrieval methods表3 物候期名称及其提取方法 |
物候期名称 | 含义 | 计算方法 |
---|---|---|
出苗 | 幼苗出土,NDVI开始上升 | 上升期曲率最大值对应时间 |
拔节 | 茎快速伸长,NDVI上升最快阶段 | 上升期曲线导数最大值对应时间 |
抽穗 | 发育完全,NDVI达到全年最大阶段 | 时间序列最大值对应时间 |
乳熟 | NDVI开始下降 | 下降期曲线最大值对应时间 |
成熟 | NDVI下降最快阶段 | 下降期曲率导数最大值对应时间 |
Fig. 2 Correlation coefficient and relative error of statistical metrics between reconstructed and ideal data of different time interval图2 不同时间间隔下重构数据与模拟理想数据的相关系数以及提取统计指标的相对误差 |
Fig. 3 The reconstruction results of time series at4-day-interval using the three models图3 4 d间隔下的各模型重构结果图 |
Fig 4 The reconstruction results of time series at16-day-interval using the three models图4 16 d间隔下的各模型重构结果图 |
Fig. 5 The reconstruction results of time series at30-day-interval using the three models图5 30 d间隔下的各模型重构效果图 |
Fig. 6 The error histograms of phenological dates derived from reconstructed data by the three models图6 3种模型重构数据所提物候期的误差直方图 |
Fig. 7 The mean of 5 phenological dates' error derivedfrom the reconstructed data of different models图7 不同模型重构数据的5项物候期误差平均值 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
[
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
[
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
[
|
[14] |
[
|
[15] |
[
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
[
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
[
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |