ARTICLES

The Spatial Expansion of Construction Land-use in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolis Circle

Expand
  • 1. College of Resources Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
    2. Urban Environmental Processes and Digital Modeling Laboratory, Beijing 100048, China;
    3. Laboratory of 3D Information Acquisition and Application, MOST, Beijing 100048, China;
    4. Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Resources Environment and GIS, Beijing 100048, China;
    5. National Library of China, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 2012-12-11

  Revised date: 2012-12-31

  Online published: 2013-04-18

Abstract

With the help of remote sensing images (Landsat TM in 1990s and 2000s, Spot4 in 2006), DEM of 90m spatial resolution, 1∶50000 topographic maps, socio-economic statistical data and other relevant information, using ENVI 4.7, ArcInfo 9.2 and spatial statistical analysis software (Geoda 095i) and some other research methods such as remote sensing information extraction, spatial analysis method, land-use dynamic changes model and theory, we carry out the research on construction land-use change in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolis Circle. Firstly, interpreting remote sensing images and analyzing the changes of urban and rural construction land-use, including the quantity and speed of land-use change, spatial pattern and spatial autocorrelation of land-use growth, the study shows that the urban and rural construction land is expanding continually from 1990 to 2006 with a 2.81% annual increasing rate, the total area of construction land is 11001.81 km2, 13786.14 km2, 15940.55 km2 in 1990, 2000 and 2006 respectively, the relative rate of change in Tangshan, Baoding and Shijiazhuang are larger than the average rate of the total area in the period from 2000 to 2006. Secondly, discussing the spatial variation of urban construction land by spatial buffer analysis methods, the result shows that the uneven development of spatial expansion including centralized development and ribbon-shaped development is significant, that is, 70% of the new distribution of urban land is within 40km from the town centre, and 80% of the new construction sites focus on the highway along the 20km range. Comparing the spatial distribution change during the two periods, i.e., new urban land from1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2006, we found that the new added urban land presents an expansion trend to outskirts of the city and the highway. Finally, in order to explore spatial aggregation of new added rural-urban construction land further, Global Moran’I, Moran scatter plot and LISA spatial aggregation map with statistical unit of the 123 counties in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolis Circle were constructed. The results show that the spatial distribution of the rural-urban construction land-use growth is not entirely random, but is spatial clustering with the similar spatial value. Moran's I of the additional urban and rural construction land during the two periods were 0.2645 and 0.4067. This study will be helpful for land use planning and ecological researches for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolis Circle.

Cite this article

MENG Dan, LI Xiao-Juan, XU Hui, GONG Hui-Li . The Spatial Expansion of Construction Land-use in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolis Circle[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2013 , 15(2) : 289 -296 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2013.00289

References

[1] 许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1997.

[2] 高珮义.中外城市化比较研究[M].天津:南开大学出版社,1991.

[3] Owen TW, Carlson T N, Gillies R R. An assessment of satelliteremotely-sensed land cover parameters in quantitativelydescribing the climatic effect of urbanization[J]. InternationalJournal of Remote Sensing, 1998,19(9):1663-1681.

[4] Jusuf S K, Wong N H, Hagen E. The influence of land useon the urban heat island in Singapore[J]. Habitat International,2007(31):232-242.

[5] Carlson T N, Arthur S T. The impact of land use-land coverchanges due to urbanization on surface microclimate andhydrology: a satellite perspective[J]. Global and PlanetaryChange, 2000(25):49-65.

[6] Weber C, Puissant A. Urbanization pressure and modelingof urban growth: Example of the Tunis Metropolitan Area[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2003,86(3):341-352.

[7] 林目轩,师迎春,陈秧分,等.长沙市区建设用地扩张的时空特征[J].地理研究,2007,26(2):265-274.

[8] 倪绍祥,谭少华.近年来我国土地利用/覆盖变化研究的进展[C].土地覆被变化及其环境效应学术会议,云南昆明,2002.

[9] 刘盛和,吴传钧,陈田.评析西方城市土地利用的理论研究[J].地理研究, 2001,20(1):111-119.

[10] 姚士谋,帅江平.城市用地与城市生长——以东南沿海城市扩展为例[M].合肥:科学技术大学出版社,1995.

[11] 张金兰,欧阳婷萍,朱照宇,等.基于景观生态学的广州城镇建设用地扩张模式分析[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(2):410-414.

[12] 顾朝林.北京土地利用/覆盖变化机制研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4):307-312.

[13] 郑艳婷.绍兴市城乡建设用地扩展的时空演变过程及其动力机制[D].北京:北京师范大学, 2004.

[14] 崔雪竹,王要武.城市用地扩张的社会人文驱动机制——以上海市为例的实证研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(2):305-310.

[15] 吴宏安,蒋建军,周杰,等.西安城市扩张及其驱动力分析[J].地理学报,2005,60(1):143-150.

[16] 彭月,何丙辉.重庆市主城区1986-2007 年用地时空演化特征分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2012,14(5):635-643.

[17] 何丹,蔡建明,周璟.天津城市用地时空扩展研究[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(3):56-60.

[18] 刘盛和,吴传钧,沈洪泉.基于GIS 的北京城市土地利用扩展模式[J].地理学报,2000,55(4):407-413.

[19] 田光进,刘纪远,张增祥,等.基于遥感与GIS 的中国农村居民点规模分布特征[J].遥感学报,2002,6(4):307-312.

[20] 姚士谋,朱振国,Cheng K K. 城市规模不能盲目求大——谈中国城市化过程中的土地合理利用问题[J].中国土地,2001(3):27-29.

[21] 史培军,宫鹏,李小兵,等.土地利用/覆盖变化研究的方法与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2000.

[22] 冯峰,杨艳丽,益建芳.基于遥感影像的长三角城镇用地扩展变化的研究[J].影像技术,2010(1):35-38.

[23] 徐春鹏.长三角地区城市土地利用集约度比较研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2007.

[24] 樊风雷.珠江三角洲核心区域土地利用时空变化遥感监测及其生态环境效应研究[D].广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所,2007.

[25] 张文忠,王传胜,薛东前.珠江三角洲城镇用地扩展的城市化背景研究[J].自然资源学报,2003,18 (5):575-582.

[26] 徐辉.基于遥感和GIS 的京津冀都市圈城乡建设用地变化分析[D].北京:首都师范大学,2008.

[27] 樊杰,陈田,张文忠,等.京津冀都市圈区域综合规划研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.

[28] 吴良铺.京津冀地区城乡空间发展规划研究二期报告[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.

[29] 傅伯杰.环渤海地区土地利用变化及可持续利用研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.

[30] 武进.中国城市形态:结构、特征及其演变[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1990.

[31] 苏伟忠.大都市边缘区城镇用地格局动态变化——以南京市为例[J].世界地理研究,2006,15(3):75-81.

[32] Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1995,27(2):93-115.

[33] 柏延臣,李新,冯学智.空间数据分析与空间模型[J].地理研究,1999,18(2):185-190.
Options
Outlines

/