Journal of Geo-information Science >
Optimization of FY Arctic Sea Ice Dataset based on NSIDC Sea Ice Product
Received date: 2016-05-01
Request revised date: 2016-10-11
Online published: 2017-02-17
Copyright
Arctic sea ice plays a very important role in the modulation of global climate and sea ice extent is a basic parameter for sea ice monitoring. In recent 40 years, a series of environmental and climatic issues such as degradation of Arctic natural environment, frequent extreme weather in the Northern Hemisphere and global sea-level rise are caused by continuous warming and apparent sea ice decrease in Arctic. So it′s important to know the extent, variation, trend of Arctic sea ice and its response to global climate change. The most commonly used datasets such as HadISST and OISST sea ice dataset provided long time series of changes in sea ice of the Arctic regions. However, the spatial resolution of these datasets is relatively low. There are some limits in the study of response of sea ice change in Arctic key regions to weather and climate in China. To overcome these problems and to make up the lack of passive microwave sea ice dataset provided by China, FY (Feng Yun) sea ice dataset is developed by NSMC (National Satellite Meteorological Center) on June 27th, 2011. In this dataset, the Enhanced NASA Team (NT2) algorithm is used based on the data of MWRI (Microwave Radiation Imager) sensor carried on FY satellite. In this algorithm, direct radiative transfer model is used to model MWRI brightness temperature for four surface types (ice-free ocean, new-formed ice, one-year ice and multi-years ice) and for different atmospheric conditions. Then, sea ice coverage lookup table (0% to 100% in 1% increments) is obtained based on modeled brightness temperature considering different atmospheric conditions. Sea ice coverage is confirmed by comparing observed value with modeled value. Sea ice extent is consistent with the actual situation in most Arctic regions. Although matching errors between channels and positioning errors have been corrected in FY dataset, the received echo signal is relatively weak due to the shorter antenna on MWRI. The weak echo signal makes it difficult to correctly differentiate the boundary between sea ice and near sea shore land, which greatly impact the total accuracy of the dataset and its application. In order to solve this problem, this study introduces a method of optimizing FY Arctic sea ice dataset based on NSIDC (National Snow and Ice Data Center) sea ice product. In NSIDC product, judgment matrix was created covering the entire grid and identifying each pixel as land, shore, near-shore, offshore or ocean as determined by the land/sea mask. Then, these different pixels are corrected in different degrees, respectively. Sea ice extent calculated from NSIDC product is strongly consistent to the actual situation. The accuracy of FY dataset is greatly improved. The analysis results indicated an extremely significantly positive correlation with the NSIDC product (R2 = 0.9997) during June 27th, 2011-December 31st, 2015. The maximum deviation percent of daily, monthly and annually sea ice extent is 3.5%, 1.9% and 0.9%, respectively. Also, the optimization process of FY dataset has no obvious influence on the spatial stratified heterogeneity of the dataset. The optimized FY dataset can correctly reflect Arctic sea ice extent and its variation, especially in coastline regions. It can provide reliable basic data for the study of Arctic sea ice change.
ZHAI Zhaokun , LU Shanlong , WANG Ping , MA Lijuan , LI Duo , REN Yuyu , WU Shengli . Optimization of FY Arctic Sea Ice Dataset based on NSIDC Sea Ice Product[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017 , 19(2) : 143 -151 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.00143
Fig. 1 The study area图1 研究区域 |
Fig. 3 Linear regression analysis between NSIDC and enhanced FY sea ice extent图3 NSIDC与FY修正后海冰范围散点图 |
Fig. 4 Spatial distribution maps of NSIDC (a, d, g, j), the original FY product (b, e, h, k) and the enhanced FY product (c, f, i, l)图4 NSIDC产品(a, d, g, j)与FY产品修正前(b, e, h, k)、修正后(c, f, i, l)空间分布对比图 |
Fig. 5 Comparisons of daily sea ice extent variation between NSIDC and FY product from June 27th, 2011 to December31st, 2015图5 NSIDC产品、FY产品修正前后2011年6月27日至2015年12月31日日平均海冰范围变化对比图 |
Fig. 6 Comparisons of monthly sea ice extent variation between NSIDC and FY product from June, 2011 to December, 2015图6 NSIDC产品、FY产品修正前后2011年6月至2015年12月月平均海冰范围变化对比图 |
Fig. 7 Comparisons of annual sea ice extent variation between NSIDC and FY product during 2011-2015图7 NSIDC产品、FY产品修正前后2011-2015年年平均海冰范围变化对比图 |
Fig. 8 Comparisons of sea ice extent variation between NSIDC and FY product in spring andsummer during the period of 2011-2015图8 2011-2015年春、夏两季NSIDC产品和FY修正后产品海冰范围时间序列 |
Fig. 9 Comparisons of sea ice extent variation between NSIDC and FY product in autumn andwinter during the period of 2011-2015图9 2011-2015年秋、冬两季NSIDC产品和FY修正后产品海冰范围时间序列 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
Change I P O C. Climate change 2014 synthesis report[J]. Environmental Policy Collection, 2014,27(2):408.This Synthesis Report is based on the reports of the three Working Groups of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), including relevant Special Reports. It provides an integrated view of climate change as the final part of the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). This summary follows the structure of the longer report, which addresses the following topics: Observed changes and their causes; Future climate change, risks and impacts; Future pathways for adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development; Adaptation and mitigation.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
[
|
[14] |
[
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
[
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
[
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |