Journal of Geo-information Science >
Spatially Explicit Assessment of Heat Health Risks Using Multi-source Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China
Received date: 2017-07-02
Request revised date: 2017-09-05
Online published: 2017-11-10
Copyright
The increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme heat events (EHEs), potentially associated with climate change in the near future, highlights the importance of heat health risks assessment, which is an important starting point for the reduction of heat-related mortality and sustainable development. However, there is a spatiotemporal mismatch between hazard data (at pixel-level) and exposure data (at census unit level) in heat health risks assessment. Based on multisensor remote sensing data and demographic and socioeconomic statistical data, we used a human settlement index to assess heat exposure. Heat health risks and its driving factors were spatially explicitly assessed and mapped at the 250 m × 250 m pixel-level across the Yangtze River Delta region (YRD). The visual inspection suggests that the high risks areas were mainly distributed in urbanized areas of YRD, including the downtown of Shanghai, Changzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wuxi, Jiaxing and Taizhou, which was mostly driven by the high human exposure and heat hazard index. In less-urbanized cities and the suburban and rural areas of mega-cities, the heat health risks come second. Even though the human exposure index was low in other less-developed areas, the heat health risks in those areas were high due to the high heat hazard and human vulnerability index. It's of great importance to identify the driving factors of high heat health risks to provide science-based support for adaptation strategies and emergency planning.
CHEN Qian , DING Mingjun , YANG Xuchao , HU Kejia . Spatially Explicit Assessment of Heat Health Risks Using Multi-source Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017 , 19(11) : 1475 -1484 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.01475
Fig. 1 Location, elevation and land cover of the study area图1 研究区概况 |
Fig. 2 Land surface temperature (LST) of daytime and nighttime in the Yangtze River Delta region图2 长江三角洲地区2013年8月7日白天和夜间地表温度 |
Fig. 3 Map of the heat hazard index of the Yangtze River Delta region图3 长江三角洲地区高温危险性指数空间分布图 |
Fig. 4 Scatterplots of the accumulated EAHSI value and population for counties in the Yangtze River Delta region图4 长江三角洲地区各市县人居指数累计值与统计人口数据相关性分析 |
Fig. 5 Map of the heat exposure index in the Yangtze River Delta region图5 长江三角洲地区人口暴露度指数空间分布图 |
Tab. 1 Descriptive statistics of the vulnerability variables表1 社会经济脆弱性因子统计性描述 |
综合指标 | 变量 | 平均值 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 性质 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄 | ≤5岁人口比例 | 0.0383 | 0.0077 | 0.0184 | 0.0634 | + |
≥65岁人口比例 | 0.1088 | 0.0285 | 0.0413 | 0.1900 | + | |
居住隔离 | ≥60岁独居人口比例 | 0.0350 | 0.0359 | 0.0074 | 0.2241 | + |
社会经济状况 | 文盲占15岁及以上人口比例 | 0.0451 | 0.0241 | 0.0121 | 0.1180 | + |
有洗澡设施住房比例 | 0.7610 | 0.1279 | 0.4022 | 0.9394 | - | |
卫生机构床位数/个 | 9408.08 | 14 187.12 | 326 | 61703 | - | |
每百户居民空调拥有量/台 | 159.20 | 27.13 | 82 | 214.30 | - | |
人均GDP/元 | 81 487.39 | 33 971.60 | 26 771.92 | 189 351.91 | - |
注:性质字段为各变量对人口社会经济脆弱性指数的作用,+表示正向作用,-表示负向作用 |
Fig. 6 Map of the heat vulnerability index in the Yangtze River Delta region图6 长江三角洲地区高温热浪人口社会经济脆弱性等级分布 |
Fig. 7 Map of the heat health risk index in the Yangtze River Delta region图7 长江三角洲地区高温热浪人群健康风险区划 |
Tab. 2 The top 20 counties with heat health risks in the Yangtze River Delta region表2 研究区高温热浪人群健康风险最高的20个行政单元 |
排名 | 统计单元 | 所处省市 | 排名 | 统计单元 | 所处省市 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 上海中心城区 | 上海市 | 11 | 常州市市辖区 | 江苏常州 |
2 | 宝山区 | 上海市 | 12 | 镇江市市辖区 | 江苏镇江 |
3 | 闵行区 | 上海市 | 13 | 桐乡市 | 浙江台州 |
4 | 嘉定区 | 上海市 | 14 | 杭州市市辖区 | 浙江杭州 |
5 | 泰州市市辖区 | 江苏泰州 | 15 | 嘉兴市市辖区 | 浙江嘉兴 |
6 | 浦东新区 | 上海市 | 16 | 江阴市 | 江苏无锡 |
7 | 奉贤区 | 上海市 | 17 | 金山区 | 上海市 |
8 | 青浦区 | 上海市 | 18 | 泰兴市 | 江苏泰州 |
9 | 松江区 | 上海市 | 19 | 海宁市 | 浙江嘉兴 |
10 | 慈溪市 | 浙江宁波 | 20 | 无锡市市辖区 | 江苏无锡 |
Fig. 8 Driving factors of heat health risks in the Yangtze River Delta region图8 研究区高温热浪人群健康风险主导因子 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
[
|
[9] |
[
|
[10] |
[
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
[
|
[16] |
[
|
[17] |
[
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
[
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
[
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
[
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
[
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
[
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
[
|
[46] |
[
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |