Journal of Geo-information Science >
Spatio-temporal Pattern of Heat Island and Multivariate Modeling of Impact Factors of Beijing Downtown from 2005 to 2016
Received date: 2017-07-21
Request revised date: 2017-09-27
Online published: 2017-11-10
Copyright
Urban heat island effect has been widely concerned as a typical climatic feature of urban area in recent years. Understanding the spatio-temporal evolution and the causes of the formation of urban heat island are of great significance to ease the thermal environment of the city and improve the comfortability for human settlement. Firstly, we retrieved the land surface temperature of Beijing downtown based on Landsat thermal infrared images in 2005, 2010 and 2016. The mean-standard deviation method was used to divide the land surface temperature to obtain multi-grade heat island intensity for analyzing the evolution law and spatial pattern of urban heat island. Secondly, four typical ground feature types, impervious surface, vegetation, bare soil and water body, were extracted. Also, the transfer information of each heat intensity in different years and the relevant thermal landscape pattern indices were calculated. Then, according to the distance from the center of the city, we divided the downtown into 30 ring buffers and analyzed the area ratios of ground feature types and the information of heat island intensity in each ring buffer. Finally, based on the statistical data of each ground feature type and the distance from the downtown, the relationship between the influence factor and the heat island intensity is established. Also, the influence of the ground feature types and the change of the distance on the urban heat island is comprehensively analyzed. The results showed that the overall heat island intensity is increasing every year in Beijing downtown. The high grade of heat island intensity of the thermal patch area gradually expanded. The diversity of the thermal landscape types is decreasing with time. Impervious surface has a great impact on the heat island intensity. The strength of heat island intensity become greater with the percentage growth of impervious surface. The strength of heat island intensity decreases gradually with the increasing distance from the center of the city.
YU Chen , HU Deyong , CAO Shisong , CHEN Shanshan . Spatio-temporal Pattern of Heat Island and Multivariate Modeling of Impact Factors of Beijing Downtown from 2005 to 2016[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2017 , 19(11) : 1485 -1494 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1047.2017.01485
Fig. 1 The study area图1 研究区 |
Tab. 1 Statistics of classification accuracies表1 地物分类精度统计 |
分类数据 | 参考数据 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水体 | 裸土 | 植被 | 不透水层 | 用户精度/% | |
水体 | 264 | 10 | 4 | 22 | 88.00 |
裸土 | 6 | 269 | 5 | 20 | 89.67 |
植被 | 7 | 6 | 280 | 7 | 93.33 |
不透水层 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 283 | 94.33 |
制图精度/% | 90.72 | 93.73 | 96.55 | 85.24 | |
全局精度/% | 91.33 | ||||
全局Kappa | 0.8844 |
Tab. 2 Comparison of the retrieved results of land surface temperature with air temperature (℃)表2 地表温度的反演结果与气温的对比 (℃) |
站点号 | 站名 | 地表温度 | 气温 | 差值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
54399 | 海淀 | 5.9 | 4.0 | 1.9 |
54433 | 朝阳 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 0.4 |
54511 | 北京 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 0.6 |
54514 | 丰台 | 4.2 | 6.4 | -2.2 |
平均值 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 0.2 |
Fig. 2 Central city proper: Spatial distribution of urban heat intensity and spatial distribution of ground feature types图2 中心城区热岛强度和地物类型的空间分布 |
Fig. 3 Statistics between heat island intensity values and distance图3 热岛强度随距离的变化 |
Tab. 3 Transition matrix of heat island intensity (%)表3 热岛强度转移矩阵(%) |
2005-2010/2010-2016 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | 4级 | 5级 | 6级 | 7级 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 42.5/37.4 | 12.6/8.2 | 7.9/4.0 | 4.1/2.5 | 2.6/2.5 | 2.3/2.6 | 3.0/2.1 |
2级 | 34.1/28.5 | 35.0/15.5 | 22.6/8.6 | 8.0/3.4 | 3.2/2.4 | 2.5/2.2 | 1.9/1.4 |
3级 | 15.6/22.6 | 35.0/31.8 | 38.2/23.7 | 19.9/8.4 | 6.3/4.8 | 4.4/3.9 | 3.9/3.6 |
4级 | 6.6/10.4 | 15.7/41.8 | 29.0/52.4 | 53.0/47.4 | 43.2/33.2 | 28.4/28.1 | 24.7/20.6 |
5级 | 0.8/0.6 | 1.0/2.2 | 1.6/8.9 | 10.8/26.3 | 26.8/26.4 | 26.5/22.1 | 21.2/16.4 |
6级 | 0.3/0.3 | 0.4/0.4 | 0.5/2.2 | 3.2/10.0 | 12.8/20.7 | 22.0/19.8 | 20.1/14.7 |
7级 | 0.3/0.2 | 0.3/0.1 | 0.3/0.2 | 1.0/2.0 | 5.1/10.1 | 13.9/21.4 | 25.2/41.2 |
Fig. 4 Statistics on assessment index of thermodynamic landscape图4 热力景观评价指数统计 |
Fig. 5 Variation between ISP and distance in different years图5 各年份不透水层盖度随距离的变化 |
Fig. 6 Regression analysis of heat island intensity values and ISP图6 热岛强度与不透水层盖度的回归分析 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
Hove L W A V,
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
[
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
[
|
[15] |
[
|
[16] |
[
|
[17] |
[
|
[18] |
[
|
[19] |
[
|
[20] |
[
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
Van De Griend A A,
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
[
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
[
|
[28] |
[
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |