Journal of Geo-information Science >
Methodological Framework and Research Progress on the Social and Economic Costs of Carbon Emission and Reduction
Received date: 2017-12-06
Request revised date: 2018-02-11
Online published: 2018-04-20
Supported by
National Key Research and Development Program of China, No.2016YFA0602500.
Copyright
Social and economic costs of carbon emission and reduction have increasingly been one of the hot research topics and are concerns by the policy makers of academic communities. We have conducted a comprehensive analysis on the key scientific issues and research progress on global carbon emission and carbon mitigation at both domestic and abroad. The latest observations from carbon satellites have proved that the global carbon dioxide has been spatially unevenly distributed. Given the 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C temperature increase limits of the Paris Agreement, we propose a technical framework to explore the temporal and spatial relationship between CO2 non-uniform dynamic distribution and global surface temperature, and to evaluate the carbon emission of selected major countries on the conditions of CO2 non-uniform dynamic distribution, and to estimate the social and economic costs of carbon emission and carbon reduction under the scenario of the 1.5°C and 2.0°C temperature limits. We finally propose an in-depth applied research on the complex relationships between climate change, economic growth and technology development. The technical framework and research methodologies in this paper will provide supports for the government on the aspects of formulating strategies and countermeasures for carbon emission and carbon reduction, by providing decision-making advices on mitigating climate change and achieving sustainable transformation and enhancing China′s dominant voice in the carbon diplomacy as well.
DENG Xiangzheng , DAN Li , YE Qian , WANG Zhaohua , LIU Yu , ZHANG Xueyan , ZHANG Fan , QI Wei , WANG Guofeng , WANG Pei , BAI Yuping . Methodological Framework and Research Progress on the Social and Economic Costs of Carbon Emission and Reduction[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2018 , 20(4) : 405 -413 . DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.170590
Tab. 1 Advantages and disadvantages of comprehensive assessment models of climate change表1 气候变化综合评估模型优劣势对比 |
IAM模型 | CGE模型 | 模拟模型 | |
---|---|---|---|
概况 | 包括以DICE、ENTICE、DEMETER-ICCS、MIND、GET-LFL 为主的全球模型,和以 RICE、FUND、CETA 为代表性的区域化模型 | 包括 JAM、IGEM 全球模型和 GTAP-E、MIT-EPPA、SGM、AIM 为代表性的区域化模型 | 主要集中在区域化分析方面,有 PAGE、ICAM-1、IMAGE、E3MG 模型等 |
优点 | 可反映不同外部假设条件下多因子间相互作用 | 可反映气候政策对社会经济结构等 影响 | 可模拟、评估自适应政策和预防措施缓解气候变化损害程度 |
缺点 | 无法反映子系统间相互作用与经济系统运行机理 | 无法模拟长期动态变化,模型参数缺乏可信度度量,初始条件敏感 | 社会经济关系过于简化,不符合实际 |
Fig. 1 Technical flowchart of studies on costs of carbon emission and reduction图1 碳排放和减碳的社会经济代价研究技术路线 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
[
|
[2] |
[
|
[3] |
[
|
[4] |
[
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
[
|
[26] |
[
|
[27] |
[
|
[28] |
[
|
[29] |
[
|
[30] |
[
|
[31] |
[
|
[32] |
[
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
[
|
[36] |
[
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
[
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
[
|
[44] |
[
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
IPCC. Climate change: Work group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report(AR5)[R]. Switzerland: IPCC, 2014.
|
[47] |
[
|
[48] |
[
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
[
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |